• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生育状况与胃癌风险:前瞻性队列研究的系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析

Parity and gastric cancer risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

作者信息

Chen Jing, Gong Ting-Ting, Wu Qi-Jun

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 4;6:18766. doi: 10.1038/srep18766.

DOI:10.1038/srep18766
PMID:26727146
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4698715/
Abstract

We performed this meta-analysis of epidemiological studies to comprehensively assess the association between parity and gastric cancer risk, because previous studies have shown conflicting results regarding this topic. Relevant prospective studies were identified by searching the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, and random-effects models were used to estimate summary relative risks (SRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Our search yielded 10 prospective cohort studies involving a total of 6624 gastric cancer cases and 5,559,695 non-cases. The SRRs for ever parity vs. nulliparous and highest vs. lowest parity number were 0.96 (95%CI = 0.87-1.05, I(2) = 0%) and 1.03 (95%CI = 0.94-1.13, I(2) = 0%), respectively. Additionally, the SRR for an increment of one live birth was 1.00 (95%CI = 0.97-1.03, I(2) = 18.6%). These non-significant associations were observed in all subgroups as stratified by the number of gastric cases, follow-up years, geographic location, menopausal status, anatomic subsite of gastric cancer, and adjustment for potential confounders, as well as in sensitivity analyses. Our meta-analysis found no significant association between parity and gastric cancer risk. However, further studies should be conducted to validate our findings and could provide more detailed results by stratifying their findings by Lauren's subtype, histology, and anatomic site, as well as fully adjusting for potential confounding factors.

摘要

由于既往研究在该主题上结果相互矛盾,我们进行了这项流行病学研究的荟萃分析,以全面评估生育与胃癌风险之间的关联。通过检索以下数据库来识别相关的前瞻性研究:PubMed、EMBASE和Web of Science,并使用随机效应模型来估计汇总相对风险(SRR)和95%置信区间(CI)。我们的检索得到了10项前瞻性队列研究,总共涉及6624例胃癌病例和5559695例非病例。曾经生育与未生育相比以及生育数最高与最低相比的SRR分别为0.96(95%CI = 0.87 - 1.05,I² = 0%)和1.03(95%CI = 0.94 - 1.13,I² = 0%)。此外,每增加一次活产的SRR为1.00(95%CI = 0.97 - 1.03,I² = 18.6%)。在按胃癌病例数、随访年限、地理位置、绝经状态、胃癌的解剖部位分层以及对潜在混杂因素进行调整的所有亚组中,以及在敏感性分析中,均观察到这些无显著意义的关联。我们的荟萃分析发现生育与胃癌风险之间无显著关联。然而,应开展进一步研究以验证我们的发现,并可通过按劳伦分型、组织学和解剖部位对结果进行分层,以及对潜在混杂因素进行充分调整,从而提供更详细的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc3d/4698715/9a10d4f92ade/srep18766-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc3d/4698715/3748614b841b/srep18766-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc3d/4698715/2670e05b274b/srep18766-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc3d/4698715/aa4a2aef296f/srep18766-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc3d/4698715/9a10d4f92ade/srep18766-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc3d/4698715/3748614b841b/srep18766-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc3d/4698715/2670e05b274b/srep18766-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc3d/4698715/aa4a2aef296f/srep18766-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc3d/4698715/9a10d4f92ade/srep18766-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Parity and gastric cancer risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.生育状况与胃癌风险:前瞻性队列研究的系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 4;6:18766. doi: 10.1038/srep18766.
2
Reproductive factors, menopausal hormone therapies and primary liver cancer risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies.生殖因素、绝经激素治疗与原发性肝癌风险:观察性研究的系统评价和剂量-反应荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Dec;23(1):126-138. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw037. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
3
Analgesia use during pregnancy and risk of cryptorchidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.孕期使用镇痛药与隐睾症风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod. 2017 May 1;32(5):1118-1129. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex047.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
Selenium for preventing cancer.硒预防癌症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 29;1(1):CD005195. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005195.pub4.
6
Number of parity and the risk of gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies.产次与胆囊癌风险:观察性研究的系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 May;293(5):1087-96. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3896-6. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
7
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.老年人髋关节囊外骨折的手术干预:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 10;2(2):CD013405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013405.pub2.
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for gastric cancer: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.胃癌的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析的伞状综述
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 26;15:1564575. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1564575. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of Reproductive Factors on Lauren Intestinal-Type Gastric Cancers in Females: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in South Korea.生殖因素对女性肠型胃 Lauren 型胃癌的影响:韩国多中心回顾性研究。
Gut Liver. 2022 Sep 15;16(5):706-715. doi: 10.5009/gnl210293. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
Effect of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer patients: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Dietary fat and fatty acid intake and epithelial ovarian cancer risk: evidence from epidemiological studies.膳食脂肪和脂肪酸摄入量与上皮性卵巢癌风险:来自流行病学研究的证据。
Oncotarget. 2015 Dec 15;6(40):43099-119. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5525.
2
Dietary fatty acids intake and endometrial cancer risk: a dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.膳食脂肪酸摄入量与子宫内膜癌风险:一项流行病学研究的剂量反应荟萃分析。
Oncotarget. 2015 Nov 3;6(34):36081-97. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5555.
3
Parity and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.
热灌注腹腔化疗对胃癌患者的疗效:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Int Med Res. 2019 Dec;47(12):5926-5936. doi: 10.1177/0300060519882545. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
4
Gastroesophageal Cancer During Pregnancy: a Case Report and Review of the Literature.妊娠期食管癌:一例病例报告及文献综述
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2019 Sep;50(3):634-640. doi: 10.1007/s12029-018-0093-4.
5
Association between antidepressant medication use and epithelial ovarian cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.抗抑郁药物使用与上皮性卵巢癌风险的关联:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Apr;84(4):649-658. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13498. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
6
The anticipating value of PLK1 for diagnosis, progress and prognosis and its prospective mechanism in gastric cancer: a comprehensive investigation based on high-throughput data and immunohistochemical validation.PLK1在胃癌诊断、进展及预后中的预测价值及其潜在机制:基于高通量数据和免疫组化验证的综合研究
Oncotarget. 2017 Sep 30;8(54):92497-92521. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21438. eCollection 2017 Nov 3.
7
Fluoxetine and congenital malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.氟西汀与先天性畸形:队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;83(10):2134-2147. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13321. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
8
Cancer: A disease at the crossroads of trade-offs.癌症:一种处于权衡十字路口的疾病。
Evol Appl. 2016 Dec 26;10(3):215-225. doi: 10.1111/eva.12444. eCollection 2017 Mar.
9
Use of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors in the first trimester and risk of cardiovascular-related malformations: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在妊娠早期使用与心血管相关畸形风险:队列研究的荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 21;7:43085. doi: 10.1038/srep43085.
10
Menstrual and Reproductive Factors and Risk of Gastric and Colorectal Cancer in Spain.西班牙的月经与生殖因素以及胃癌和结直肠癌风险
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 24;11(10):e0164620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164620. eCollection 2016.
生育状况与子宫内膜癌风险:一项流行病学研究的荟萃分析
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 16;5:14243. doi: 10.1038/srep14243.
4
Fish consumption and risk of myeloma: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.鱼类消费与骨髓瘤风险:流行病学研究的荟萃分析
Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Sep;26(9):1307-14. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0625-1. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
5
Circulating adiponectin, leptin and adiponectin-leptin ratio and endometrial cancer risk: Evidence from a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies.循环脂联素、瘦素及脂联素-瘦素比值与子宫内膜癌风险:来自流行病学研究的荟萃分析证据
Int J Cancer. 2015 Oct 15;137(8):1967-78. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29561. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
6
Global cancer statistics, 2012.全球癌症统计数据,2012 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
7
Nonlinear reduction in risk for colorectal cancer by oral contraceptive use: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.口服避孕药使用对结直肠癌风险的非线性降低作用:一项流行病学研究的荟萃分析
Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Jan;26(1):65-78. doi: 10.1007/s10552-014-0483-2. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
8
Parity and pancreatic cancer risk: a dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies.生育状况与胰腺癌风险:流行病学研究的剂量反应荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 21;9(3):e92738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092738. eCollection 2014.
9
Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention.胃癌:描述性流行病学、风险因素、筛查与预防
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 May;23(5):700-13. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1057. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
10
Parity and kidney cancer risk: evidence from epidemiologic studies.均等和肾癌风险:来自流行病学研究的证据。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Dec;22(12):2345-53. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0759-T. Epub 2013 Oct 9.