Oshima Taku, Pichard Claude
Crit Care. 2015;19 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S5. doi: 10.1186/cc14723. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
This review emphasizes the benefits of parenteral nutrition (PN) in critically ill patients, when prescribed for relevant indications, in adequate quantities, and in due time. Critically ill patients are at risk of energy deficit during their ICU stay, a condition which leads to unfavorable outcomes, due to hypercatabolism secondary to the stress response and the difficulty to optimize feeding. Indirect calorimetry is recommended to define the energy target, since no single predictive equation accurately estimates energy expenditure. Energy metabolism is intimately associated with protein metabolism. Recent evidence calls for adequate protein provision, but there is no accurate method to estimate the protein requirements, and recommendations are probably suboptimal. Enteral nutrition (EN) is the preferred route of feeding, but gastrointestinal intolerance limits its efficacy and PN allows for full coverage of energy needs. Seven recent articles concerning PN for critically ill patients were identified and carefully reviewed for the clinical and scientific relevance of their conclusions. One article addressed the unfavorable effects of early PN, although this result should be more correctly regarded as a consequence of glucose load and hypercaloric feeding. The six other articles were either in favor of PN or concluded that there was no difference in the outcome compared with EN. Hypercaloric feeding was not observed in these studies. Hypocaloric feeding led to unfavorable outcomes. This further demonstrates the beneficial effects of an early and adequate feeding with full EN, or in case of failure of EN with exclusive or supplemental PN. EN is the first choice for critically ill patients, but difficulties providing optimal nutrition through exclusive EN are frequently encountered. In cases of insufficient EN, individualized supplemental PN should be administered to reduce the infection rate and the duration of mechanical ventilation. PN is a safe therapeutic option as long as sufficient attention is given to avoid hypercaloric feeding.
本综述强调了肠外营养(PN)在危重症患者中的益处,前提是针对相关适应症、给予适量且及时的肠外营养。危重症患者在重症监护病房(ICU)住院期间存在能量不足的风险,由于应激反应继发的高分解代谢以及优化喂养的困难,这种情况会导致不良后果。建议采用间接测热法来确定能量目标,因为没有单一的预测方程能够准确估计能量消耗。能量代谢与蛋白质代谢密切相关。近期证据表明需要提供充足的蛋白质,但尚无准确方法来估计蛋白质需求量,且相关建议可能并不理想。肠内营养(EN)是首选的喂养途径,但胃肠道不耐受限制了其效果,而PN能够满足全部能量需求。我们检索并仔细审阅了最近七篇关于危重症患者PN的文章,以评估其结论在临床和科学方面的相关性。有一篇文章探讨了早期PN的不良影响,不过这一结果更应被视为葡萄糖负荷和高热量喂养的后果。其他六篇文章要么支持PN,要么得出与EN相比结局无差异的结论。这些研究中未观察到高热量喂养的情况。低热量喂养导致了不良后果。这进一步证明了早期给予充足的全肠内营养,或者在肠内营养失败时给予全肠外营养或补充肠外营养的有益效果。肠内营养是危重症患者的首选,但经常会遇到仅通过肠内营养难以提供最佳营养的困难。在肠内营养不足的情况下,应给予个体化的补充肠外营养,以降低感染率和机械通气时间。只要充分注意避免高热量喂养,PN是一种安全的治疗选择。