Suppr超能文献

在面部不对称的三维计算机断层扫描分析中,根据建立正中矢状参考平面的方法确定面中部标志点的位置。

The location of midfacial landmarks according to the method of establishing the midsagittal reference plane in three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of facial asymmetry.

作者信息

Kim Min Sun, Lee Eun Joo, Song In Ja, Lee Jae-Seo, Kang Byung-Cheol, Yoon Suk-Ja

机构信息

School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.

Department of Oral Anatomy, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.

出版信息

Imaging Sci Dent. 2015 Dec;45(4):227-32. doi: 10.5624/isd.2015.45.4.227. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of methods of establishing the midsagittal reference plane (MRP) on the locations of midfacial landmarks in the three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) analysis of facial asymmetry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 24 patients (12 male and 12 female; mean age, 22.5 years; age range, 18.2-29.7 years) with facial asymmetry were included in this study. The MRP was established using two different methods on each patient's CT image. The x-coordinates of four midfacial landmarks (the menton, nasion, upper incisor, and lower incisor) were obtained by measuring the distance and direction of the landmarks from the MRP, and the two methods were compared statistically. The direction of deviation and the severity of asymmetry found using each method were also compared.

RESULTS

The x-coordinates of the four anatomic landmarks all showed a statistically significant difference between the two methods of establishing the MRP. For the nasion and lower incisor, six patients (25.0%) showed a change in the direction of deviation. The severity of asymmetry also changed in 16 patients (66.7%).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that the locations of midfacial landmarks change significantly according to the method used to establish the MRP.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在面部不对称的三维计算机断层扫描(CT)分析中,建立矢状面参考平面(MRP)的方法对面中部标志点位置的影响。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了24例面部不对称患者(12例男性,12例女性;平均年龄22.5岁;年龄范围18.2 - 29.7岁)。在每位患者的CT图像上使用两种不同方法建立MRP。通过测量面中部四个标志点(颏下点、鼻根点、上切牙和下切牙)到MRP的距离和方向,获取其x坐标,并对两种方法进行统计学比较。同时还比较了使用每种方法发现的偏斜方向和不对称严重程度。

结果

在建立MRP的两种方法之间,四个解剖标志点的x坐标均显示出统计学上的显著差异。对于鼻根点和下切牙,6例患者(25.0%)的偏斜方向发生了变化。16例患者(66.7%)的不对称严重程度也发生了变化。

结论

本研究结果表明,根据用于建立MRP的方法不同,面中部标志点的位置会发生显著变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bca/4697007/38cbf420d218/isd-45-227-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验