Kim Min Sun, Lee Eun Joo, Song In Ja, Lee Jae-Seo, Kang Byung-Cheol, Yoon Suk-Ja
School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
Department of Oral Anatomy, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
Imaging Sci Dent. 2015 Dec;45(4):227-32. doi: 10.5624/isd.2015.45.4.227. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of methods of establishing the midsagittal reference plane (MRP) on the locations of midfacial landmarks in the three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) analysis of facial asymmetry.
A total of 24 patients (12 male and 12 female; mean age, 22.5 years; age range, 18.2-29.7 years) with facial asymmetry were included in this study. The MRP was established using two different methods on each patient's CT image. The x-coordinates of four midfacial landmarks (the menton, nasion, upper incisor, and lower incisor) were obtained by measuring the distance and direction of the landmarks from the MRP, and the two methods were compared statistically. The direction of deviation and the severity of asymmetry found using each method were also compared.
The x-coordinates of the four anatomic landmarks all showed a statistically significant difference between the two methods of establishing the MRP. For the nasion and lower incisor, six patients (25.0%) showed a change in the direction of deviation. The severity of asymmetry also changed in 16 patients (66.7%).
The results of this study suggest that the locations of midfacial landmarks change significantly according to the method used to establish the MRP.
本研究旨在评估在面部不对称的三维计算机断层扫描(CT)分析中,建立矢状面参考平面(MRP)的方法对面中部标志点位置的影响。
本研究纳入了24例面部不对称患者(12例男性,12例女性;平均年龄22.5岁;年龄范围18.2 - 29.7岁)。在每位患者的CT图像上使用两种不同方法建立MRP。通过测量面中部四个标志点(颏下点、鼻根点、上切牙和下切牙)到MRP的距离和方向,获取其x坐标,并对两种方法进行统计学比较。同时还比较了使用每种方法发现的偏斜方向和不对称严重程度。
在建立MRP的两种方法之间,四个解剖标志点的x坐标均显示出统计学上的显著差异。对于鼻根点和下切牙,6例患者(25.0%)的偏斜方向发生了变化。16例患者(66.7%)的不对称严重程度也发生了变化。
本研究结果表明,根据用于建立MRP的方法不同,面中部标志点的位置会发生显著变化。