Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Ann Transl Med. 2015 Dec;3(21):336. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.12.18.
External beam radiotherapy has proven highly effective against a wide range of cancers, and in recent decades there have been rapid advances with traditional photon-based (X-ray) radiotherapy and the development of two particle-based techniques, proton and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). There are major cost differences and both physical and biological differences among these modalities that raise important questions about relative treatment efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) represent the gold standard for comparing treatments, but there are significant cost and ethical barriers to their wide-spread use. Meta-analysis of non-coordinated clinical trials data is another tool that can be used to compare treatments, and while this approach has recognized limitations, it is argued that meta-analysis represents an early stage of investigation that can help inform the design of future RCTs.
外照射放疗已被证明对多种癌症具有高度疗效,在最近几十年中,传统的基于光子(X 射线)的放疗以及质子和碳离子放疗(CIRT)这两种基于粒子的技术得到了快速发展。这些方法之间存在重大的成本差异和物理及生物学差异,这引发了关于相对治疗效果和成本效益的重要问题。随机临床试验(RCT)是比较治疗方法的金标准,但广泛使用 RCT 存在显著的成本和伦理障碍。对非协调临床试验数据的荟萃分析是另一种可用于比较治疗方法的工具,尽管这种方法存在公认的局限性,但有人认为荟萃分析代表了一个早期的研究阶段,可以帮助为未来的 RCT 设计提供信息。