Perdigão Jorge, Sezinando Ana, Gomes George
Division of Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Quintessence Int. 2011 May;42(5):e65-73.
To study the sealing ability of a self-adhesive sealant.
Thirty-five extracted molars were assigned to seven groups: group 1, 35% phosphoric acid (PA) followed by Clinpro Sealant (CL) as the control group; group 2, Enamel Loc (EL), a self-adhesive sealant; group 3, PA followed by EL; group 4, Adper Prompt L-Pop (AP) followed by CL; group 5, AP followed by EL; group 6, PA followed by Adper Single Bond Plus (SB) and CL; and group 7, PA followed by SB and EL. Specimens were thermocycled and immersed in 50 wt% ammoniac silver nitrate. Silver leakage was measured in ranks from 0 to 4 and analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests at P < .05. One additional tooth per group was used to study the enamel etching pattern. Specimens were observed under a field-emission SEM.
The least silver infiltration was measured for group 1 (control group), which was significantly different from all other six groups. Etching enamel prior to the application of EL resulted in significantly less leakage than all other groups, except for the control group. EL alone resulted in similar leakage to EL with either AP or SB. None of the groups resulted in perfectly sealed interfaces. Under SEM, EL was unable to etch enamel. The self-etch adhesive AP resulted in a less defined etching pattern than the etch-and-rinse adhesive SB.
Etching enamel with phosphoric acid is still essential for sealing the enamel-sealant interface. The self-adhesive sealant tested in this study may not be indicated for clinical use.
研究一种自粘性封闭剂的封闭能力。
35颗拔除的磨牙被分为7组:第1组,用35%磷酸(PA)处理后再使用Clinpro封闭剂(CL)作为对照组;第2组,使用自粘性封闭剂Enamel Loc(EL);第3组,先用PA处理,再使用EL;第4组,先用Adper Prompt L-Pop(AP)处理,再使用CL;第5组,先用AP处理,再使用EL;第6组,先用PA处理,再使用Adper Single Bond Plus(SB)和CL;第7组,先用PA处理,再使用SB和EL。对样本进行热循环处理,并浸泡在50 wt%的氨硝酸银中。银渗漏情况按0至4级进行分级测量,并采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney检验进行分析,P <.05。每组额外使用一颗牙齿来研究釉质蚀刻模式。在场发射扫描电子显微镜下观察样本。
第1组(对照组)的银渗入量最少,与其他所有六组有显著差异。在使用EL之前蚀刻釉质导致的渗漏明显少于除对照组外的所有其他组。单独使用EL导致的渗漏与EL和AP或SB联合使用时相似。没有一组能实现完全密封的界面。在扫描电子显微镜下,EL无法蚀刻釉质。自酸蚀粘结剂AP产生的蚀刻模式比酸蚀冲洗粘结剂SB的蚀刻模式更不清晰。
用磷酸蚀刻釉质对于封闭釉质-封闭剂界面仍然至关重要。本研究中测试的自粘性封闭剂可能不适合临床使用。