• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭纽带:家庭环境在癌症家族健康史沟通中的作用

Family Ties: The Role of Family Context in Family Health History Communication About Cancer.

作者信息

Rodríguez Vivian M, Corona Rosalie, Bodurtha Joann N, Quillin John M

机构信息

a Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences , Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York , New York , USA.

b Department of Psychology , Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond , Virginia , USA.

出版信息

J Health Commun. 2016;21(3):346-55. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1080328. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1080/10810730.2015.1080328
PMID:26735646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4852547/
Abstract

Family health history about cancer is an important prevention and health promotion tool. Yet few studies have identified family context factors that promote such discussions. We explored relations among family context (cohesion, flexibility, and openness), self-efficacy, and cancer communication (gathering family history, sharing cancer risk information, and frequency) in a diverse group of women enrolled in a randomized control trial. Baseline survey data for 472 women were analyzed. The women's average age was 34 years, 59% identified as Black, 31% had graduated high school, and 75% reported a family history of any cancer. Results showed that greater family cohesion and flexibility were related to higher communication frequency and sharing cancer information. Women who reported greater self-efficacy were more likely to have gathered family history, shared cancer risk information, and communicated more frequently with relatives. Openness was not associated with communication but was related to greater family cohesion and flexibility. Adjusting for demographic variables, self-efficacy, and family cohesion significantly predicted communication frequency. Women with higher self-efficacy were also more likely to have gathered family health history about cancer and shared cancer risk information. Future research may benefit from considering family organization and self-efficacy when developing psychosocial theories that in turn inform cancer prevention interventions.

摘要

癌症家族健康史是一种重要的预防和健康促进工具。然而,很少有研究确定促进此类讨论的家庭背景因素。我们在一组参与随机对照试验的不同女性群体中,探讨了家庭背景(凝聚力、灵活性和开放性)、自我效能感与癌症沟通(收集家族病史、分享癌症风险信息及频率)之间的关系。对472名女性的基线调查数据进行了分析。这些女性的平均年龄为34岁,59%为黑人,31%高中毕业,75%报告有任何癌症家族史。结果显示,更强的家庭凝聚力和灵活性与更高的沟通频率及分享癌症信息相关。报告自我效能感更强的女性更有可能收集家族病史、分享癌症风险信息,并与亲属更频繁地交流。开放性与沟通无关,但与更强的家庭凝聚力和灵活性相关。调整人口统计学变量、自我效能感和家庭凝聚力后,显著预测了沟通频率。自我效能感较高的女性也更有可能收集癌症家族健康史并分享癌症风险信息。未来的研究在发展社会心理理论(进而为癌症预防干预提供信息)时,考虑家庭组织和自我效能感可能会有所助益。

相似文献

1
Family Ties: The Role of Family Context in Family Health History Communication About Cancer.家庭纽带:家庭环境在癌症家族健康史沟通中的作用
J Health Commun. 2016;21(3):346-55. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1080328. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
2
Talking (or not) about family health history in families of Latino young adults.谈论(或不谈论)拉丁裔年轻成年人家庭中的家族健康史。
Health Educ Behav. 2013 Oct;40(5):571-80. doi: 10.1177/1090198112464495. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
3
The KinFact intervention - a randomized controlled trial to increase family communication about cancer history.亲属因素干预——一项旨在增加家庭关于癌症病史沟通的随机对照试验。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Oct;23(10):806-16. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4754.
4
Family health history communication networks of older adults: importance of social relationships and disease perceptions.老年人家庭健康史交流网络:社会关系和疾病认知的重要性。
Health Educ Behav. 2013 Oct;40(5):612-9. doi: 10.1177/1090198112473110. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
5
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
6
The context of collecting family health history: examining definitions of family and family communication about health among African American women.收集家族健康史的背景:审视非裔美国女性中关于家庭的定义以及家庭内部有关健康的沟通情况。
J Health Commun. 2015 Apr;20(4):416-23. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.977466. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
7
Using a family systems approach to investigate cancer risk communication within melanoma families.采用家庭系统方法研究黑素瘤家族中的癌症风险沟通。
Psychooncology. 2010 Oct;19(10):1102-11. doi: 10.1002/pon.1667.
8
Impact of family history assessment on communication with family members and health care providers: A report from the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr).家族史评估对与家庭成员及医疗服务提供者沟通的影响:来自家庭健康软件™影响试验(FHITr)的报告。
Prev Med. 2015 Aug;77:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 19.
9
We are talking, but are they listening? Communication patterns in families with a history of breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC).我们在交谈,但他们在听吗?有乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族史(HBOC)的家庭中的沟通模式。
Psychooncology. 2004 May;13(5):335-45. doi: 10.1002/pon.745.
10
A randomized clinical trial of a psychoeducational intervention to improve outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus.一项旨在改善系统性红斑狼疮治疗效果的心理教育干预随机临床试验。
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Jun;50(6):1832-41. doi: 10.1002/art.20279.

引用本文的文献

1
Family Communication of Genetic Risk: What is it and Why does it Matter?遗传风险的家庭沟通:是什么以及为何重要?
Acta Med Philipp. 2025 Jun 30;59(8):7-15. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.9721. eCollection 2025.
2
Prospective changes in primary care patients' family communication after skin cancer genetic test offer.皮肤癌基因检测提供后,初级保健患者家庭沟通的前瞻性变化。
PEC Innov. 2025 Jun 7;7:100409. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100409. eCollection 2025 Dec.
3
Enhancing Communication Among Patients with Cancer, Caregivers, and Extended Family: Development of a Communication Module.加强癌症患者、护理人员和大家庭之间的沟通:沟通模块的开发。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 1;22(4):541. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040541.
4
Protocol for a new family history of addiction density score to aid in the treatment of alcohol and substance use disorders.用于辅助治疗酒精和物质使用障碍的成瘾密度新家族史评分方案。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2025 Feb 20;15:100321. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100321. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
The families SHARE project: novel insights on recruiting and engaging Black men in a community-based genomic education program.家庭共享项目:关于在社区基因组教育项目中招募和吸引黑人男性参与的新见解。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 27;25(1):805. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21853-x.
6
The Implementation of Decision Aids During Medical Consultations for Lung Cancer Patients: A Focus Group Within I3LUNG Project.肺癌患者医疗咨询期间决策辅助工具的实施:I3LUNG项目中的一个焦点小组
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Jan 21. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02566-6.
7
Risk for Hereditary Neoplastic Syndromes in Women with Mismatch Repair-Proficient Endometrial Cancer.错配修复功能健全的子宫内膜癌女性的遗传性肿瘤综合征风险。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Oct 26;14(11):1999. doi: 10.3390/genes14111999.
8
Exploring Intergenerational Communication on Social Media Group Chats as a Cancer Prevention Intervention Opportunity Among Vietnamese American Families: Qualitative Study.探索社交媒体群组聊天中的代际沟通作为越南裔美国家庭癌症预防干预机会:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Feb 15;7:e35601. doi: 10.2196/35601.
9
The indirect effect of family communication patterns on young adults' health self-disclosure: Understanding the role of descriptive and injunctive norms in a test of the integrative model of behavioral prediction.家庭沟通模式对年轻人健康自我表露的间接影响:在行为预测整合模型检验中理解描述性规范和指令性规范的作用
Commun Rep (Pullman). 2021;34(3):121-136. doi: 10.1080/08934215.2021.1924213. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
10
Feasibility and Assessment of a Cascade Traceback Screening Program (FACTS): Protocol for a Multisite Study to Implement and Assess an Ovarian Cancer Traceback Cascade Testing Program.级联追溯筛查计划(FACTS)的可行性与评估:一项实施和评估卵巢癌追溯级联检测计划的多中心研究方案
J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 11;11(6):543. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060543.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of family history assessment on communication with family members and health care providers: A report from the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr).家族史评估对与家庭成员及医疗服务提供者沟通的影响:来自家庭健康软件™影响试验(FHITr)的报告。
Prev Med. 2015 Aug;77:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 19.
2
Impact of a randomized controlled educational trial to improve physician practice behaviors around screening for inherited breast cancer.一项旨在改善医生在遗传性乳腺癌筛查方面实践行为的随机对照教育试验的影响
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Mar;30(3):334-41. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3113-5. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
3
The KinFact intervention - a randomized controlled trial to increase family communication about cancer history.亲属因素干预——一项旨在增加家庭关于癌症病史沟通的随机对照试验。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Oct;23(10):806-16. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4754.
4
Understanding narrative effects in physical activity promotion: the influence of breast cancer survivor testimony on exercise beliefs, self-efficacy, and intention in breast cancer patients.理解体育活动促进中的叙事效果:乳腺癌幸存者证言对乳腺癌患者运动信念、自我效能感和运动意愿的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Mar;23(3):761-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2422-x. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
5
Patterns of family health history communication among older African American adults.老年非裔美国成年人家庭健康史沟通模式。
J Health Commun. 2015;20(1):80-7. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.908984. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
6
Family health information sharing among older adults: reaching more family members.老年人家庭健康信息共享:覆盖更多家庭成员。
J Community Genet. 2015 Jan;6(1):17-27. doi: 10.1007/s12687-014-0197-x. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
7
"That was grown folks' business": narrative reflection and response in older adults' family health history communication.“那是成年人的事”:老年人家庭健康史交流中的叙事反思与回应
Health Commun. 2015;30(3):221-30. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2013.837569. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
8
Investigating uncertainty and emotions in conversations about family health history: a test of the theory of motivated information management.探究家庭健康史交流中的不确定性和情绪:动机信息管理理论的检验。
J Health Commun. 2014;19(8):939-54. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.837558. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
9
Understanding family health information seeking: a test of the theory of motivated information management.理解家庭健康信息寻求:动机信息管理理论的检验。
J Health Commun. 2014;19(1):6-23. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.778369. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
10
The impact of patient narratives on self-efficacy and self-care in Australians with type 2 diabetes: stage 1 results of a randomized trial.患者叙述对澳大利亚2型糖尿病患者自我效能和自我护理的影响:一项随机试验的第一阶段结果
Health Promot Int. 2015 Sep;30(3):438-48. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat058. Epub 2013 Aug 28.