• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血糖自我监测设备的准确性:一种随机误差模型。

Accuracy of devices for self-monitoring of blood glucose: A stochastic error model.

作者信息

Vettoretti M, Facchinetti A, Sparacino G, Cobelli C

出版信息

Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:2359-62. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318867.

DOI:10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318867
PMID:26736767
Abstract

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) devices are portable systems that allow measuring glucose concentration in a small drop of blood obtained via finger-prick. SMBG measurements are key in type 1 diabetes (T1D) management, e.g. for tuning insulin dosing. A reliable model of SMBG accuracy would be important in several applications, e.g. in in silico design and optimization of insulin therapy. In the literature, the most used model to describe SMBG error is the Gaussian distribution, which however is simplistic to properly account for the observed variability. Here, a methodology to derive a stochastic model of SMBG accuracy is presented. The method consists in dividing the glucose range into zones in which absolute/relative error presents constant standard deviation (SD) and, then, fitting by maximum-likelihood a skew-normal distribution model to absolute/relative error distribution in each zone. The method was tested on a database of SMBG measurements collected by the One Touch Ultra 2 (Lifescan Inc., Milpitas, CA). In particular, two zones were identified: zone 1 (BG≤75 mg/dl) with constant-SD absolute error and zone 2 (BG>75mg/dl) with constant-SD relative error. Mean and SD of the identified skew-normal distributions are, respectively, 2.03 and 6.51 in zone 1, 4.78% and 10.09% in zone 2. Visual predictive check validation showed that the derived two-zone model accurately reproduces SMBG measurement error distribution, performing significantly better than the single-zone Gaussian model used previously in the literature. This stochastic model allows a more realistic SMBG scenario for in silico design and optimization of T1D insulin therapy.

摘要

血糖自我监测(SMBG)设备是便携式系统,可通过手指采血获取的一小滴血来测量葡萄糖浓度。SMBG测量是1型糖尿病(T1D)管理的关键,例如用于调整胰岛素剂量。在一些应用中,如胰岛素治疗的计算机模拟设计和优化,一个可靠的SMBG准确性模型将非常重要。在文献中,描述SMBG误差最常用的模型是高斯分布,然而,该模型过于简单,无法恰当解释观察到的变异性。在此,提出了一种推导SMBG准确性随机模型的方法。该方法包括将葡萄糖范围划分为绝对/相对误差具有恒定标准差(SD)的区域,然后通过最大似然法将偏态正态分布模型拟合到每个区域的绝对/相对误差分布。该方法在由One Touch Ultra 2(加利福尼亚州米尔皮塔斯的LifeScan公司)收集的SMBG测量数据库上进行了测试。具体而言,确定了两个区域:区域1(血糖≤75mg/dl)具有恒定标准差的绝对误差,区域2(血糖>75mg/dl)具有恒定标准差的相对误差。在区域1中,所确定的偏态正态分布的均值和标准差分别为2.03和6.51,在区域2中分别为4.78%和10.09%。视觉预测检查验证表明,所推导的两区模型准确地再现了SMBG测量误差分布,其性能明显优于文献中先前使用的单区高斯模型。这种随机模型为T1D胰岛素治疗的计算机模拟设计和优化提供了更现实的SMBG场景。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of devices for self-monitoring of blood glucose: A stochastic error model.血糖自我监测设备的准确性:一种随机误差模型。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:2359-62. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318867.
2
A Model of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Measurement Error.自我监测血糖测量误差模型。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jul;11(4):724-735. doi: 10.1177/1932296817698498. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
3
Clinical performance of CGMS in type 1 diabetic patients treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using insulin analogs.使用胰岛素类似物持续皮下胰岛素输注治疗的1型糖尿病患者中动态血糖监测系统的临床性能
Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):582-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.582.
4
Assessing sensor accuracy for non-adjunct use of continuous glucose monitoring.评估用于非辅助性连续血糖监测的传感器准确性。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Mar;17(3):177-86. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0272. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
5
Accuracy, User Acceptability, and Safety Evaluation for the FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System When Used by Pregnant Women with Diabetes.用于糖尿病孕妇的 FreeStyle Libre 闪光血糖监测系统的准确性、用户可接受性和安全性评估。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Mar;20(3):180-188. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0386. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
6
Evaluation of five devices for self-monitoring of blood glucose in the normoglycaemic range.五种用于正常血糖范围内自我血糖监测设备的评估
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 1998;106(4):360-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1211998.
7
Non-adjunctive flash glucose monitoring system use during summer-camp in children with type 1 diabetes: The free-summer study.1 型糖尿病患儿夏令营期间非辅助性瞬感血糖监测系统的使用:自由夏日研究。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Nov;19(7):1285-1293. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12729. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
8
Improved Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Pediatric Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Results from Two Studies.糖尿病患儿连续血糖监测系统准确性的提高:两项研究的结果
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Feb;18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S223-33. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0380.
9
Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Testing with Built-in Insulin Dose Advisor Based on ISO 15197:2013: System Accuracy and Hematocrit Influence.基于 ISO 15197:2013 评估四种内置胰岛素剂量调整功能的血糖仪的系统准确性和红细胞压积影响的自我检测性能。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Apr;20(4):303-313. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0391.
10
Patient decision-making of CGM sensor driven insulin therapies in type 1 diabetes: In silico assessment.1型糖尿病中持续葡萄糖监测(CGM)传感器驱动胰岛素治疗的患者决策:计算机模拟评估
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:2363-6. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318868.

引用本文的文献

1
A Model of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Measurement Error.自我监测血糖测量误差模型。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jul;11(4):724-735. doi: 10.1177/1932296817698498. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
2
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors: Past, Present and Future Algorithmic Challenges.连续血糖监测传感器:过去、现在及未来的算法挑战
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Dec 9;16(12):2093. doi: 10.3390/s16122093.