• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文版饮食评估工具(EAT-10)在评估急性脑卒中吞咽困难患者中的信效度研究

[Reliability and validity of the Chinese Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) in evaluation of acute stroke patients with dysphagia].

作者信息

Wang Rumi, Xiong Xuehong, Zhang Changjie, Fan Yongmei

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.

出版信息

Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015 Dec;40(12):1391-9. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2015.12.017.

DOI:10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2015.12.017
PMID:26739084
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the reliability and validity of the Chinese Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) in evaluation of acute stroke patients with dysphagia.

METHODS

The inpatients of stroke were assessed with Chinese EAT-10. As a golden standard for evaluation of dysphagia, videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) test was used to judge the reliability and validity of EAT-10.

RESULTS

A total of 130 qualified questionnaires were collected. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for Chinese EAT-10 scale was 0.845. The total score of each item was related. The lowest or highest correlation coefficient for the item 2 or 3 was 0.271 or 0.772. The retest reliability was greater than 0.7, which met the requirements. According to the investigator consistency reliability test, the value collected from the investigator in the item 2 kept constant. The consistent correlation coefficient of the remaining nine items was more than 0.7. The consistency between each item and the mean score was high. The EAT-10 with the cut-off point at 1 was an optimal cut-off point. With the cut-off value of 1 (EAT-10 score ≥ 1), the sensitivity and specificity for EAT-10 was 77.9% and 66.1%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative value (NPV) was 71.6% and 73.2%, respectively, with 2.30 LHR+ and 0.33 LHR- for dysphagia.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese EAT-10 has a good reliability and validity in evaluation of the acute stroke patients with dysphagia. The sensitivity and negative value are the best with the cut-off value of 1 (EAT-10 score ≥ 1). It offers a good way to discriminate dysphagia, impaired efficacy, penetrations, and aspirations in acute stroke patients.

摘要

目的

研究中文版进食评估工具(EAT - 10)在评估急性脑卒中吞咽困难患者中的可靠性和有效性。

方法

对脑卒中住院患者采用中文版EAT - 10进行评估。以电视荧光吞咽造影检查(VFSS)作为吞咽困难评估的金标准,判断EAT - 10的可靠性和有效性。

结果

共收集到130份合格问卷。中文版EAT - 10量表的克朗巴哈α系数为0.845。各项目总分相关,项目2或3的最低或最高相关系数分别为0.271或0.772。重测信度大于0.7,符合要求。根据研究者一致性信度检验,项目2中研究者收集的值保持恒定。其余9个项目的一致性相关系数均大于0.7。各项目与平均分之间的一致性较高。以1分为分界点的EAT - 10是最佳分界点。当分界值为1(EAT - 10评分≥1)时,EAT - 10的敏感性和特异性分别为77.9%和66.1%。吞咽困难的阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为71.6%和73.2%,似然比阳性(LHR +)为2.30,似然比阴性(LHR -)为0.33。

结论

中文版EAT - 10在评估急性脑卒中吞咽困难患者时具有良好的可靠性和有效性。分界值为1(EAT - 10评分≥1)时敏感性和阴性预测值最佳。它为鉴别急性脑卒中患者的吞咽困难、功能障碍、食物误咽和误吸提供了一种很好的方法。

相似文献

1
[Reliability and validity of the Chinese Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) in evaluation of acute stroke patients with dysphagia].中文版饮食评估工具(EAT-10)在评估急性脑卒中吞咽困难患者中的信效度研究
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015 Dec;40(12):1391-9. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2015.12.017.
2
Reliability and validity of the DYMUS questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis (Greek version) and proposed modification.用于评估多发性硬化症吞咽障碍的 DYMUS 问卷的信度和效度(希腊语版)及提出的修订。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Jul;23:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 10.
3
Validation of the Spanish Version of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10spa) in Colombia. A Blinded Prospective Cohort Study.哥伦比亚版饮食评估工具-10(EAT-10spa)的验证。一项前瞻性盲法队列研究。
Dysphagia. 2016 Jun;31(3):398-406. doi: 10.1007/s00455-016-9690-1. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
4
Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).饮食评估工具(EAT-10)的有效性和可靠性。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008 Dec;117(12):919-24. doi: 10.1177/000348940811701210.
5
Finnish Version of the Eating Assessment Tool (F-EAT-10): A Valid and Reliable Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Dysphagia Evaluation.芬兰版进食评估工具(F-EAT-10):用于评估吞咽困难的有效且可靠的患者报告结局测量工具。
Dysphagia. 2022 Aug;37(4):995-1007. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10362-9. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
6
The Pediatric Version of the Eating Assessment Tool: a caregiver administered dyphagia-specific outcome instrument for children.儿童饮食评估工具:一种由照料者实施的针对儿童吞咽困难的特定结局评估工具。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Aug;40(17):2088-2092. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1323235. Epub 2017 May 5.
7
Validity and reliability of the French version of Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).法国版饮食评估工具(EAT-10)的有效性和可靠性。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jun;276(6):1727-1736. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05429-1. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
8
Validation of the Swedish translation of eating assessment tool (S-EAT-10).饮食评估工具瑞典语翻译版(S-EAT-10)的验证
Acta Otolaryngol. 2016 Jul;136(7):749-53. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2016.1146411. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
9
Reliability and validity of the Italian Eating Assessment Tool.意大利饮食评估工具的信度和效度
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013 Nov;122(11):717-24. doi: 10.1177/000348941312201109.
10
Does the Hebrew Eating Assessment Tool-10 Correlate with Pharyngeal Residue, Penetration and Aspiration on Fiberoptic Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing?希伯来进食评估工具-10 与纤维内镜吞咽检查的咽部残留、渗透和吸入是否相关?
Dysphagia. 2019 Jun;34(3):372-381. doi: 10.1007/s00455-018-9964-x. Epub 2019 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of tongue strength, endurance, and pressure using Iowa oral performance instrument and predictors of dysphagia in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study.使用爱荷华口腔功能仪器评估社区居住老年人的舌肌力量、耐力和压力的准确性以及吞咽困难的预测因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Mar 24;25(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05859-z.
2
Association between oral dryness and dysphagia in community-dwelling older population.社区居住老年人群口腔干燥与吞咽困难之间的关联。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2025 Jun;29(6):100533. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2025.100533. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
3
Association of dysphagia and loneliness and their interaction with sleep quality among older adults in nursing homes: A cross-sectional study.
养老院老年人吞咽困难、孤独感及其与睡眠质量的关系:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 26;19(9):e0311024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311024. eCollection 2024.
4
Approaching person-centered clinical practice: A cluster analysis of older inpatients utilizing the measurements of intrinsic capacity.接近以患者为中心的临床实践:利用内在能力测量对老年住院患者进行聚类分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 11;10:1045421. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1045421. eCollection 2022.
5
[Progress in evaluation of swallowing function after treatment of head and neck malignant tumors].[头颈部恶性肿瘤治疗后吞咽功能评估的研究进展]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Sep;34(9):861-864. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.09.022.
6
Does the Hebrew Eating Assessment Tool-10 Correlate with Pharyngeal Residue, Penetration and Aspiration on Fiberoptic Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing?希伯来进食评估工具-10 与纤维内镜吞咽检查的咽部残留、渗透和吸入是否相关?
Dysphagia. 2019 Jun;34(3):372-381. doi: 10.1007/s00455-018-9964-x. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
7
Reliability and validity of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (Greek adaptation) in neurogenic and head and neck cancer-related oropharyngeal dysphagia.饮食评估工具-10(希腊语改编版)在神经源性及头颈部癌症相关口咽吞咽困难中的信度和效度
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jul;275(7):1861-1868. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5001-9. Epub 2018 May 17.