Wu Harry X, Hallingbäck Henrik R, Sánchez Leopoldo
Umeå Plant Science Centre (UPSC), Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden Commonwealth Scientific and Industry Research Organization (CSIRO), Black Mountain Laboratories, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Umeå Plant Science Centre (UPSC), Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
G3 (Bethesda). 2016 Jan 6;6(3):529-40. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.025767.
In the domestication and breeding of tree species that suffer from inbreeding depression (ID), the long-term performance of different breeding strategies is poorly known. Therefore, seven tree breeding strategies including single population, subline, selfing, and nucleus breeding were simulated using a multi-locus model with additive, partial, and complete dominance allele effects, and with intermediate, U-shaped, and major allele distributions. The strategies were compared for genetic gain, inbreeding accumulation, capacity to show ID, the frequencies and fixations of unfavorable alleles, and genetic variances in breeding and production populations. Measured by genetic gain of production population, the nucleus breeding and the single breeding population with mass selection strategies were equal or superior to subline and single breeding population with within-family selection strategies in all simulated scenarios, in spite of their higher inbreeding coefficients. Inbreeding and cross-breeding effectively decreased ID and could in some scenarios produce genetic gains during the first few generations. However, in all scenarios, considerable fixation of unfavorable alleles rendered the purging performance of selfing and cross-breeding strategies ineffective, and resulted in substantial inferiority in comparison to the other strategies in the long-term.
在遭受近亲繁殖衰退(ID)的树种驯化和育种过程中,不同育种策略的长期表现鲜为人知。因此,利用一个具有加性、部分显性和完全显性等位基因效应,以及中间、U型和主等位基因分布的多位点模型,模拟了包括单群体、亚系、自交和核心育种在内的七种树木育种策略。对这些策略在遗传增益、近亲繁殖积累、表现出ID的能力、不利等位基因的频率和固定情况,以及育种群体和生产群体中的遗传方差等方面进行了比较。以生产群体的遗传增益来衡量,在所有模拟情景中,核心育种和采用混合选择策略的单育种群体,尽管其近亲繁殖系数较高,但与采用家系内选择策略的亚系和单育种群体相当或更优。近亲繁殖和杂交有效地降低了ID,并且在某些情景下,在最初几代中能够产生遗传增益。然而,在所有情景中,不利等位基因的大量固定使得自交和杂交育种策略的清除效果无效,并且从长期来看,与其他策略相比导致了显著劣势。