Cope Rebecca, Glowa Thomas, Faulds Samantha, McMahon Deborah, Prasad Ramakrishna
1 University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (at time of research).
2 Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2016 Feb;30(2):51-5. doi: 10.1089/apc.2015.0222. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
Now that highly efficacious, interferon-free (IFN-free), direct acting antivirals (DAA) for the treatment of hepatitis C (HCV) have closed the gap between treatment and cure, identifying barriers that prevent initiation of treatment is more crucial than ever. This is a retrospective study utilizing Electronic Medical Records and Prior Authorization Records to identify HCV treatment gaps, including predictors for intention-to-treat and treatment initiation in the first 15 months of a Ryan White funded human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV co-infection clinic. This study included 128 adults ≥ 18 years old with HIV and chronic HCV infection who had visited the treatment center at least once since January 2013. Provider intent-to-treat was used to differentiate patients actively considered for treatment based on documentation kept by a multidisciplinary HCV team. Members of this group who had gone on to initiate treatment were identified. Baseline characteristics were compared. Rates of active treatment consideration and treatment initiation were 30% and 14%, respectively. HCV treatment-naïve individuals were less likely to be considered for treatment [risk ratio (RR) 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-2.32] and initiate therapy (RR 2.33, 95% CI 0.97-5.60). Advanced liver disease had no significant association. Black race (RR 1.96, 95% CI 0.90-4.25) and Medicaid insurance holders (RR 1.90, 95% CI 0.95-3.82) tended to be less likely to initiate therapy. The availability of IFN-free DAA regimens has yet to increase HCV treatment uptake in our HIV/HCV co-infected population. Barriers to HCV treatment initiation have shifted from medical contraindications to socioeconomic variables.
鉴于用于治疗丙型肝炎(HCV)的高效、无干扰素(IFN-free)直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)已缩小了治疗与治愈之间的差距,识别阻碍治疗启动的障碍比以往任何时候都更加关键。这是一项回顾性研究,利用电子病历和预先授权记录来识别HCV治疗差距,包括在瑞安·怀特资助的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)/HCV合并感染诊所的前15个月中意向性治疗和治疗启动的预测因素。本研究纳入了128名年龄≥18岁的HIV和慢性HCV感染成人,他们自2013年1月以来至少去过一次治疗中心。根据多学科HCV团队保存的记录,使用提供者意向性治疗来区分积极考虑接受治疗的患者。确定了该组中已开始治疗的成员。比较了基线特征。积极治疗考虑率和治疗启动率分别为30%和14%。未接受过HCV治疗的个体被考虑接受治疗的可能性较小[风险比(RR)1.58,95%置信区间(CI)1.07 - 2.32],开始治疗的可能性也较小(RR 2.33,95% CI 0.97 - 5.60)。晚期肝病无显著关联。黑人种族(RR 1.96,95% CI 0.90 - 4.25)和医疗补助保险持有者(RR 1.90,95% CI 0.95 - 3.82)开始治疗的可能性往往较小。无干扰素DAA方案尚未提高我们HIV/HCV合并感染人群中HCV治疗的接受度。HCV治疗启动的障碍已从医学禁忌转向社会经济变量。