Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; YR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education (YRGCARE), Chennai, India.
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jul;57:51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding barriers to hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment among people who inject drugs (PWID) in low-resource settings, particularly in the era of direct-acting antiviral therapies. METHODS: Between March, 2015-August, 2016, a cross-sectional survey was administered to community-based PWID in Chennai, India to examine the HCV care continuum and associated barriers. Adjusted prevalence ratios (APR) were estimated by multivariable Poisson regression with robust variance. RESULTS: All participants were male (n = 541); 152 participants had HCV mono-infection and 61 participants had HIV/HCV co-infection. Only one HCV mono-infected and one HIV/HCV co-infected participant was linked to HCV care. Overall, there was moderate knowledge of HCV disease but poor knowledge of HCV treatment. Higher total knowledge scores were negatively associated with HIV/HCV co-infection (vs. HCV mono-infection), though this was not statistically significant in adjusted analysis (APR = 0.71 [95%CI = 0.47-1.06]). Participants ≥45 years (APR = 0.73 [95%CI = 0.58-0.92]) and participants with HIV/HCV co-infection (APR = 0.64 [95%CI = 0.47-0.87]) were less willing to take weekly interferon injections for 12 weeks. Willingness to undergo HCV treatment improved with decreasing duration of therapy, higher perceived efficacy, and use of pills vs. interferon, though willingness to use interferon improved with decreasing duration of therapy. Most participants preferred daily visits to a clinic for HCV treatment versus receiving a month's supply. Participants ≥45 years (vs. <45 years; APR = 0.70 [95%CI = 0.56-0.88]) and participants with HIV/HCV co-infection (APR = 0.75 [95%CI = 0.57-0.98]) were less likely to intend on seeking HCV care. Common reasons for not having already seen a provider for HCV treatment differed by HIV status, and included low perceived need for treatment (HCV-mono-infected), competing money/health priorities and costs/fears about treatment (HIV/HCV-co-infected). CONCLUSION: Residual gaps in HCV knowledge and continuing negative perceptions related to interferon-based therapy highlight the need to scale-up educational initiatives. Readiness for HCV treatment was particularly low among HIV/HCV co-infected and older PWID, emphasizing the importance of tailored treatment strategies.
背景:在资源匮乏的环境中,特别是在直接作用抗病毒治疗时代,人们对吸毒者(PWID)的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)治疗障碍知之甚少。
方法:2015 年 3 月至 2016 年 8 月,对印度钦奈的社区吸毒者进行了横断面调查,以检查 HCV 护理连续体及相关障碍。采用多变量泊松回归模型(robust variance)估计调整后患病率比(APR)。
结果:所有参与者均为男性(n=541);152 名参与者患有 HCV 单感染,61 名参与者患有 HIV/HCV 合并感染。仅有 1 名 HCV 单感染和 1 名 HIV/HCV 合并感染的参与者与 HCV 护理相关。总体而言,对 HCV 疾病的认识中等,但对 HCV 治疗的认识较差。较高的总知识得分与 HIV/HCV 合并感染呈负相关(与 HCV 单感染相比),但在调整分析中无统计学意义(APR=0.71[95%CI=0.47-1.06])。≥45 岁的参与者(APR=0.73[95%CI=0.58-0.92])和 HIV/HCV 合并感染的参与者(APR=0.64[95%CI=0.47-0.87])不太愿意接受 12 周的每周干扰素注射。随着治疗时间的缩短、治疗效果的提高和使用药丸而不是干扰素,接受 HCV 治疗的意愿有所改善,但是随着治疗时间的缩短,使用干扰素的意愿有所提高。大多数参与者更喜欢每天到诊所接受 HCV 治疗,而不是接受一个月的药物供应。≥45 岁的参与者(与<45 岁相比;APR=0.70[95%CI=0.56-0.88])和 HIV/HCV 合并感染的参与者(APR=0.75[95%CI=0.57-0.98])不太可能打算接受 HCV 护理。由于不同的 HIV 状况,尚未因 HCV 治疗而寻求提供者的常见原因也有所不同,包括治疗需求低(HCV 单感染)、竞争金钱/健康优先事项和治疗费用/恐惧(HIV/HCV 合并感染)。
结论:HCV 知识方面仍存在差距,并且对基于干扰素的治疗方法的负面看法仍然存在,这突出了扩大教育计划的必要性。HIV/HCV 合并感染和年龄较大的 PWID 对 HCV 治疗的准备程度尤其低,这强调了制定针对性治疗策略的重要性。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018-4-19
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018-7-20
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025-1-16
Int J Equity Health. 2017-6-14