Kasprzyk Danuta, Montaño Daniel E, Hamilton Deven T, Down Kayla L, Marrett Karl D, Tshimanga Mufuta, Xaba Sinokuthemba, Mugurungi Owen
1 Department of Family and Child Nursing, School of Nursing , Seattle, Washington.
2 Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2016 Jan;30(1):25-33. doi: 10.1089/apc.2015.0111.
Male circumcision (MC), an effective HIV prevention tool, has been added to Zimbabwe's Ministry of Health and Child Care HIV/AIDS Prevention Program. A Phase I safety trial of a nonsurgical male circumcision device was conducted and extensive psychosocial variables were assessed. Fifty-three men (18 and older) were recruited for the device procedure; 13 follow-up clinical visits were completed. Interviews conducted three times (before the procedure, at 2 weeks and 90 days post-procedure) assessed: Satisfaction; expectations; actual experience; activities of daily living; sexual behavior; and HIV risk perception. Using the Integrated Behavioral Model, attitudes towards MC, sex, and condoms, and sources of social influence and support were also assessed. Men (mean age 32.5, range 18-50; mean years of education = 13.6; 55% employed) were satisfied with device circumcision results. Men understand that MC is only partially protective against HIV acquisition. Most (94.7%) agreed that they will continue to use condoms to protect themselves from HIV. Pain ratings were surprisingly negative for a procedure billed as painless. Men talked to many social networks members about their MC experience; post-procedure (mean of 14 individuals). Minimal impact on activities of daily living and absenteeism indicate possible cost savings of device circumcisions. Spontaneous erections occurred frequently post-procedure. The results had important implications for changes in the pre-procedure clinical counseling protocol. Clear-cut counseling to manage pain and erection expectations should result in improved psychosocial outcomes in future roll-out of device circumcisions. Men's expectations must be managed through evidence-based counseling, as they share their experiences broadly among their social networks.
男性包皮环切术是一种有效的预防艾滋病工具,已被纳入津巴布韦卫生和儿童保健部的艾滋病预防计划。开展了一项非手术男性包皮环切器械的一期安全性试验,并评估了大量社会心理变量。招募了53名年龄在18岁及以上的男性进行器械手术;完成了13次后续临床随访。在手术前、术后2周和90天进行了三次访谈,评估内容包括:满意度;期望;实际体验;日常生活活动;性行为;以及艾滋病病毒风险认知。还使用综合行为模型评估了对男性包皮环切术、性行为和避孕套的态度,以及社会影响和支持的来源。男性(平均年龄32.5岁,范围18 - 50岁;平均受教育年限 = 13.6年;55%有工作)对器械包皮环切术的结果感到满意。男性明白男性包皮环切术只能部分预防感染艾滋病病毒。大多数人(94.7%)同意他们将继续使用避孕套来预防艾滋病病毒感染。对于一项宣称无痛的手术,疼痛评分却出奇地负面。男性与许多社交网络成员谈论了他们的男性包皮环切术经历;术后平均与14个人交流过。对日常生活活动和旷工的影响极小,这表明器械包皮环切术可能节省成本。术后频繁出现自然勃起。这些结果对术前临床咨询方案的改变具有重要意义。通过明确的咨询来管理疼痛和勃起期望,应能在未来推广器械包皮环切术时改善社会心理结果。必须通过基于证据的咨询来管理男性的期望,因为他们会在社交网络中广泛分享自己的经历。