Domitrovich Celene E, Bradshaw Catherine P, Berg Juliette K, Pas Elise T, Becker Kimberly D, Musci Rashelle, Embry Dennis D, Ialongo Nicholas
Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.
CASEL, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Prev Sci. 2016 Apr;17(3):325-37. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0618-z.
A number of classroom-based interventions have been developed to improve social and behavioral outcomes for students, yet few studies have examined how these programs impact the teachers who are implementing them. Impacts on teachers may affect students and therefore also serve as an important proximal outcome to examine. The current study draws upon data from a school-based randomized controlled trial testing the impact of two prevention programs. In one intervention condition, teachers were trained in the classroom behavior management program, PAX Good Behavior Game (PAX GBG). In a second intervention condition, teachers were trained to use an integrated program, referred to as PATHS to PAX, of the PAX GBG and a social and emotional learning curriculum called Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies (PATHS©). This study aimed to determine whether both interventions positively impacted teachers, with a particular interest in the teachers' own beliefs and perceptions regarding self-efficacy, burnout, and social-emotional competence. The sample included 350 K-5 teachers across 27 schools (18 schools randomized to intervention, 9 to control). Multilevel latent growth curve analyses indicated that the PATHS to PAX condition generally demonstrated the most benefits to teachers, relative to both the control and PAX GBG conditions. These findings suggest that school-based preventive interventions can have a positive impact on teachers' beliefs and perceptions, particularly when the program includes a social-emotional component. Several possible mechanisms might account for the added benefit to teachers. Additional research is needed to better understand how these programs impact teachers, as well as students.
为改善学生的社交和行为结果,已经开发了一些基于课堂的干预措施,但很少有研究考察这些项目对实施它们的教师有何影响。对教师的影响可能会波及学生,因此这也是一个需要考察的重要近端结果。本研究利用了一项基于学校的随机对照试验的数据,该试验测试了两个预防项目的影响。在一种干预条件下,教师接受了课堂行为管理项目“PAX良好行为游戏”(PAX GBG)的培训。在另一种干预条件下,教师接受培训以使用一个综合项目,即PAX GBG与一个名为“促进替代思维策略”(PATHS©)的社会情感学习课程相结合的“通往PAX的PATHS”项目。本研究旨在确定这两种干预措施是否都对教师产生了积极影响,特别关注教师自身对自我效能感、职业倦怠和社会情感能力的信念和看法。样本包括来自27所学校的350名幼儿园至五年级教师(18所学校随机分配到干预组,9所学校为对照组)。多层次潜在增长曲线分析表明,相对于对照组和PAX GBG组,“通往PAX的PATHS”组总体上对教师显示出最大的益处。这些发现表明,基于学校的预防性干预措施可以对教师的信念和看法产生积极影响,特别是当该项目包含社会情感成分时。几种可能的机制或许可以解释对教师的额外益处。需要进一步的研究来更好地理解这些项目如何影响教师以及学生。