Li Wen, O'Brien Jennifer E, Snyder Susan M, Howard Matthew O
School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
School of Social Work, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0145981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145981. eCollection 2016.
Empirical studies have identified increasing rates of problematic Internet use worldwide and a host of related negative consequences. However, researchers disagree as to whether problematic Internet use is a subtype of behavioral addiction. Thus, there are not yet widely accepted and validated diagnostic criteria for problematic Internet use. To address this gap, we used mixed-methods to examine the extent to which signs and symptoms of problematic Internet use mirror DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for substance use disorder, gambling disorder, and Internet gaming disorder. A total of 27 university students, who self-identified as intensive Internet users and who reported Internet-use-associated health and/or psychosocial problems were recruited. Students completed two measures that assess problematic Internet use (Young's Diagnostic Questionnaire and the Compulsive Internet Use Scale) and participated in focus groups exploring their experiences with problematic Internet use. Results of standardized measures and focus group discussions indicated substantial overlap between students' experiences of problematic Internet use and the signs and symptoms reflected in the DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorder, gambling disorder, and Internet gaming disorder. These signs and symptoms included: a) use Internet longer than intended, b) preoccupation with the Internet, c) withdrawal symptoms when unable to access the Internet, d) unsuccessful attempts to stop or reduce Internet use, e) craving, f) loss of interest in hobbies or activities other than the Internet, g) excessive Internet use despite the knowledge of related problems, g) use of the Internet to escape or relieve a negative mood, and h) lying about Internet use. Tolerance, withdrawal symptoms, and recurrent Internet use in hazardous situations were uniquely manifested in the context of problematic Internet use. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
实证研究表明,全球范围内网络使用问题的发生率在不断上升,且伴随着一系列相关的负面后果。然而,对于网络使用问题是否为行为成瘾的一种亚型,研究人员存在分歧。因此,目前尚未有被广泛接受和验证的网络使用问题诊断标准。为填补这一空白,我们采用混合方法来研究网络使用问题的体征和症状在多大程度上与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中物质使用障碍、赌博障碍及网络游戏障碍的诊断标准相符。我们共招募了27名自称是重度网络使用者且报告有与网络使用相关的健康和/或心理社会问题的大学生。这些学生完成了两项评估网络使用问题的量表(杨氏诊断问卷和强迫性网络使用量表),并参加了焦点小组讨论,分享他们网络使用问题的经历。标准化测量和焦点小组讨论的结果表明,学生网络使用问题的经历与DSM-5中物质使用障碍、赌博障碍及网络游戏障碍标准所反映的体征和症状之间存在大量重叠。这些体征和症状包括:a) 上网时间超过预期;b) 沉迷于网络;c) 无法上网时出现戒断症状;d) 试图停止或减少上网但未成功;e) 渴望上网;f) 对网络以外的爱好或活动失去兴趣;g) 尽管知道相关问题仍过度使用网络;h) 对上网情况说谎。耐受性、戒断症状以及在危险情况下反复使用网络在网络使用问题的背景下有独特表现。文中还讨论了该研究对研究和实践的启示。