Department of Psychiatry,University Medicine Greifswald,Greifswald,Germany.
Institute for Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine,University of Regensburg,Regensburg,Germany.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Feb;26(1):61-69. doi: 10.1017/S2045796015001134. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
Previous cross-sectional studies revealed inconsistent results regarding mental health treatment preferences among the general population. In particular, it is unclear to what extent specific age groups approve psychotherapy or psychotropic medication for the treatment of mental disorders. We explore whether treatment recommendations of either psychotherapy or psychiatric medication change over the lifespan which includes age-related effects due to increasing age of a person, cohort effects that reflect specific opinions during the time a person was born and period effects that reflect societal changes.
Using data from three identical population surveys in Germany from 1990, 2001 and 2011 (combined n = 9046), we performed age-period-cohort analyses to determine the pure age, birth cohort and time period effects associated with the specific treatment recommendations for a person with either depression or schizophrenia, using logistic Partial Least-Squares regression models.
For both disorders, approval of both psychotherapy and medication for a person with mental illness increases with age. At the same time, younger cohorts showed stronger recommendations particularly for psychotherapy (OR around 1.07 per decade). The strongest effects could be observed for time period with an increase in recommendation between 1990 and 2001 with odds ratio of 2.36 in depression and 2.97 in schizophrenia, respectively. In general, the treatment option that showed the strongest increase in recommendation was medication for schizophrenia and psychotherapy for depression.
Underutilisation of psychotherapy in old age seems not to reflect treatment preferences of older persons. Thus, special treatment approaches need to be offered for this group that seems to be willing for psychotherapy but do not yet use it. Cohort patterns suggest that approval of psychotherapy among older persons will likely further increase in the coming years as these people get older. Finally, strong period effects underpin the importance of changing attitudes in the society. These could reflect reporting changes about psychiatric topics in the media or a general increase in the perception of treatment options. Nevertheless, more treatment offers especially for older people are needed.
先前的横断面研究显示,一般人群对心理健康治疗的偏好存在不一致的结果。特别是,特定年龄组对心理障碍治疗的心理治疗或精神药物治疗的认可程度尚不清楚。我们探讨了心理治疗或精神药物治疗的建议是否会随着生命周期而改变,这包括由于个人年龄的增长而产生的与年龄相关的影响、反映个人出生时特定观点的队列效应以及反映社会变化的时期效应。
使用来自德国 1990 年、2001 年和 2011 年的三项相同人口调查的数据(合计 n=9046),我们通过逻辑部分最小二乘回归模型进行年龄-时期-队列分析,以确定与特定治疗建议相关的特定年龄、出生队列和时期效应,用于治疗患有抑郁症或精神分裂症的人。
对于两种疾病,患有精神疾病的人对心理治疗和药物治疗的认可都随着年龄的增长而增加。与此同时,年轻的队列对心理治疗的建议更为强烈(每十年增加约 1.07)。可以观察到最强的效果是在 1990 年至 2001 年期间治疗建议增加的时间段,抑郁症的比值比为 2.36,精神分裂症的比值比为 2.97。一般来说,建议增加最强的治疗选择是精神分裂症的药物治疗和抑郁症的心理治疗。
老年人对心理治疗的利用不足似乎并不反映老年人的治疗偏好。因此,需要为这群似乎愿意接受心理治疗但尚未使用的人提供特殊的治疗方法。队列模式表明,随着这些人年龄的增长,老年人对心理治疗的认可很可能在未来几年进一步增加。最后,强烈的时期效应强调了改变社会态度的重要性。这些可能反映了媒体对精神科话题的报道变化或治疗选择的普遍增加。然而,仍需要更多的治疗方法,特别是为老年人提供。