Shaverdian Narek, Tenn Stephen, Veruttipong Darlene, Wang Jason, Hegde John, Lee Chul, Cao Minsong, Agazaryan Nzhde, Steinberg Michael, Kupelian Patrick, Lee Percy
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1059):20150963. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150963. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
We evaluated whether patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) without full prescription dose coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) had inferior outcomes.
The SBRT regimen was 54 Gy in three fractions. Dosimetric constraints were as per the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0236 guidelines. All patients underwent four-dimensional CT (4D-CT) simulation. The internal target volume (ITV) was defined using 4D-CT, and the PTV was defined as a 6-mm longitudinal and a 3-mm axial expansion from the ITV. If normal tissue constraints were beyond tolerance, ITV-based dosing was employed where priority was made for full ITV coverage at the expense of PTV coverage. Patients with and without full PTV dose coverage were compared, and control rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.
120 NSCLC cases were evaluated with 81% having adequate PTV dose coverage. ITV and PTV were significantly larger in the cohort with inadequate PTV dose coverage (p = 0.0085 and p = 0.0038, respectively), and the mean ITV and PTV doses were higher in patients with adequate PTV dose coverage (p = 0.002 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The 3-year local control rate was 100% for both cohorts. There was no difference in 3-year regional control (p = 0.36), disease-specific survival (p = 0.79) or overall survival (p = 0.73).
When delivering a highly ablative SBRT regimen for early-stage NSCLC, full-dose coverage of the ITV is sufficient for local control.
Our data are among the first to evaluate the utility of PTV margins in a highly ablative SBRT regimen and suggest that when dosing constraints cannot be met, full tumouricidal dose coverage of the ITV is sufficient for local control.
我们评估了接受立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)但计划靶区(PTV)未达到全处方剂量覆盖的早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的预后是否较差。
SBRT方案为分3次给予54 Gy。剂量学限制遵循放射治疗肿瘤学组0236指南。所有患者均接受四维CT(4D-CT)模拟。使用4D-CT定义内部靶区(ITV),PTV定义为在ITV基础上纵向扩展6 mm和轴向扩展3 mm。如果正常组织限制超出耐受范围,则采用基于ITV的剂量给予方式,优先保证ITV的全剂量覆盖,而牺牲PTV的覆盖。比较PTV全剂量覆盖和未全剂量覆盖的患者,并使用Kaplan-Meier分析估计控制率。
评估了120例NSCLC病例,其中81%的患者PTV剂量覆盖充足。PTV剂量覆盖不足的队列中ITV和PTV显著更大(分别为p = 0.0085和p = 0.0038),PTV剂量覆盖充足的患者ITV和PTV的平均剂量更高(分别为p = 0.002和p < 0.0001)。两个队列的3年局部控制率均为100%。3年区域控制(p = 0.36)、疾病特异性生存(p = 0.79)或总生存(p = 0.73)无差异。
在为早期NSCLC实施高消融性SBRT方案时,ITV的全剂量覆盖足以实现局部控制。
我们的数据是首批评估高消融性SBRT方案中PTV边界效用的研究之一,表明当无法满足剂量限制时,ITV的全肿瘤杀灭剂量覆盖足以实现局部控制。