• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前路颈椎椎体次全切除并游离带血管腓骨移植术与多节段椎间盘切除术及植骨术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的比较

Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with free vascularized fibular graft versus multilevel discectomy and grafting for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

作者信息

Shaker Ahmed Saleh, Addosooki Ahmad I, El-Deen Mohamed Alam

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Nov 12;9:60. doi: 10.14444/2060. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.14444/2060
PMID:26767152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4710155/
Abstract

PURPOSE

A retrospective study to compare the radiologic and clinical outcomes of 2 different anterior approaches, multilevel anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) using autologus ticortical bone graft versus anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (ACCF) using free vascularized fibular graft (FVFG) for the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy(CSM).

METHODS

A total of 15 patients who underwent ACDF or ACCF using FVFG for multilevel CSM were divided into two groups. Group A (n = 7) underwent ACDF and group B (n = 8) ACCF. Clinical outcomes using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, perioperative parameters including operation time and hospital stay, radiological parameters including fusion rate and cervical lordosis, and complications were compared.

RESULTS

Both group A and group B demonstrated significant increases in JOA scores. Patients who underwent ACDF experienced significantly shorter operation times and hospital stay. Both groups showed significant increases in postoperative cervical lordosis and achieved the same fusion rate (100 %). No major complications were encountered in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Both ACDF and ACCF using FVFG provide satisfactory clinical outcomes and fusion rates for multilevel CSM. However, multilevel ACDF is associated with better radiologic parameters, shorter hospital stay and shorter operative times.

摘要

目的

一项回顾性研究,比较两种不同前路手术的放射学和临床结果,即采用自体皮质骨移植的多节段颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与采用游离血管化腓骨移植(FVFG)的颈椎椎体次全切除融合术(ACCF)治疗脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)。

方法

共有15例接受FVFG的ACDF或ACCF治疗多节段CSM的患者被分为两组。A组(n = 7)接受ACDF,B组(n = 8)接受ACCF。比较使用日本骨科学会(JOA)评分的临床结果、包括手术时间和住院时间的围手术期参数、包括融合率和颈椎前凸的放射学参数以及并发症。

结果

A组和B组的JOA评分均显著提高。接受ACDF的患者手术时间和住院时间明显更短。两组术后颈椎前凸均显著增加,融合率相同(100%)。两组均未出现重大并发症。

结论

采用FVFG的ACDF和ACCF对多节段CSM均提供了满意的临床结果和融合率。然而,多节段ACDF具有更好的放射学参数、更短的住院时间和更短的手术时间。

相似文献

1
Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with free vascularized fibular graft versus multilevel discectomy and grafting for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.前路颈椎椎体次全切除并游离带血管腓骨移植术与多节段椎间盘切除术及植骨术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的比较
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Nov 12;9:60. doi: 10.14444/2060. eCollection 2015.
2
Two-level corpectomy versus three-level discectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparison of perioperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes.颈椎脊髓病的两级椎体次全切除术与三级椎间盘切除术:围手术期、影像学及临床结果比较
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Sep;23(3):280-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14545. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
3
Efficacy of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study.多节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与椎体次全切除融合术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的疗效:一项至少 5 年的随访研究。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug;21(8):1551-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2296-x. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
4
A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and corpectomy in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者前路颈椎间盘切除术与椎体切除术的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Mar;21(3):474-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1961-9. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
5
Adjacent two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus one-level corpectomy and fusion in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Analysis of perioperative parameters and sagittal balance.相邻两节段颈椎前路减压融合术与单节段椎体次全切融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的围手术期参数和矢状位平衡的对比分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;194:105919. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105919. Epub 2020 May 17.
6
Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Insights from a National Registry.前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的疗效比较:来自国家注册登记研究的启示。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Dec;132:e852-e861. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.220. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
7
Symptomatic postoperative spinal epidural hematoma preferentially occurs after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion: a retrospective study.术后症状性脊髓硬膜外血肿更常发生在前路颈椎间盘切除融合术而非前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术后:一项回顾性研究。
Ann Palliat Med. 2022 Jun;11(6):2025-2032. doi: 10.21037/apm-22-488.
8
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: systematic review and a meta-analysis.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的系统评价与Meta分析
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 Jan 29;11:161-70. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S72699. eCollection 2015.
9
Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus discectomy and fusion for the treatment of two-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: analysis of sagittal balance and axial symptoms.前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术与椎间盘切除融合术治疗双节段脊髓型颈椎病:矢状面平衡及轴性症状分析
Int Orthop. 2018 Aug;42(8):1877-1882. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3804-3. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
10
[Comparative analysis of two hybrid technique in treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy via anterior approach].[两种前路混合技术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的对比分析]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 Nov 25;31(11):1034-1040. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.11.010.

引用本文的文献

1
A Meta-Analysis of Surgical Outcomes in 25727 Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion or Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Cervical Deformity.对25727例因颈椎畸形接受前路颈椎间盘切除融合术或前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术患者手术结果的荟萃分析。
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):1390-1404. doi: 10.1177/21925682241270100. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
2
Plasma VDBP, 25(OH)D, and GSH levels predict surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.血浆 VDBP、25(OH)D 和 GSH 水平可预测脊髓型颈椎病患者的手术结果。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2019 Feb;35(2):102-110. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12015.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and corpectomy in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者前路颈椎间盘切除术与椎体切除术的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Mar;21(3):474-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1961-9. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
2
Two-level anterior cervical discectomy versus one-level corpectomy in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.双节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除术与单节段椎体次全切除术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的对比
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 1;34(7):692-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318199690a.
3
Free vascularized fibula grafts for salvage of failed oncologic long bone reconstruction and pathologic fractures.带血管游离腓骨移植用于挽救失败的肿瘤性长骨重建和病理性骨折。
Microsurgery. 2009;29(5):385-92. doi: 10.1002/micr.20624.
4
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术相关并发症。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 1;32(21):2310-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318154c57e.
5
Anterior cervical approach for the treatment of cervical myelopathy.前路颈椎手术治疗脊髓型颈椎病
Neurosurgery. 2007 Jan;60(1 Supp1 1):S64-70. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000215399.67006.05.
6
Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.脊髓型颈椎病的手术治疗
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jul;88(7):1619-40. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00014.
7
Free vascularized fibular grafts for reconstruction of skeletal defects.用于重建骨骼缺损的带血管游离腓骨移植术。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct;12(5):360-9. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200409000-00010.
8
The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks.切除破裂颈椎间盘的前路手术。
J Neurosurg. 1958 Nov;15(6):602-17. doi: 10.3171/jns.1958.15.6.0602.
9
The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion.通过前路椎间盘切除和椎间融合治疗某些颈椎疾病。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958 Jun;40-A(3):607-24.
10
Graft migration or displacement after multilevel cervical corpectomy and strut grafting.多节段颈椎椎体次全切除及支撑植骨术后的移植物迁移或移位。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 May 15;28(10):1016-21; discussion 1021-2. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000061998.62204.D7.