Suppr超能文献

前路颈椎椎体次全切除并游离带血管腓骨移植术与多节段椎间盘切除术及植骨术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的比较

Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with free vascularized fibular graft versus multilevel discectomy and grafting for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

作者信息

Shaker Ahmed Saleh, Addosooki Ahmad I, El-Deen Mohamed Alam

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Nov 12;9:60. doi: 10.14444/2060. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

PURPOSE

A retrospective study to compare the radiologic and clinical outcomes of 2 different anterior approaches, multilevel anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) using autologus ticortical bone graft versus anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (ACCF) using free vascularized fibular graft (FVFG) for the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy(CSM).

METHODS

A total of 15 patients who underwent ACDF or ACCF using FVFG for multilevel CSM were divided into two groups. Group A (n = 7) underwent ACDF and group B (n = 8) ACCF. Clinical outcomes using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, perioperative parameters including operation time and hospital stay, radiological parameters including fusion rate and cervical lordosis, and complications were compared.

RESULTS

Both group A and group B demonstrated significant increases in JOA scores. Patients who underwent ACDF experienced significantly shorter operation times and hospital stay. Both groups showed significant increases in postoperative cervical lordosis and achieved the same fusion rate (100 %). No major complications were encountered in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Both ACDF and ACCF using FVFG provide satisfactory clinical outcomes and fusion rates for multilevel CSM. However, multilevel ACDF is associated with better radiologic parameters, shorter hospital stay and shorter operative times.

摘要

目的

一项回顾性研究,比较两种不同前路手术的放射学和临床结果,即采用自体皮质骨移植的多节段颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与采用游离血管化腓骨移植(FVFG)的颈椎椎体次全切除融合术(ACCF)治疗脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)。

方法

共有15例接受FVFG的ACDF或ACCF治疗多节段CSM的患者被分为两组。A组(n = 7)接受ACDF,B组(n = 8)接受ACCF。比较使用日本骨科学会(JOA)评分的临床结果、包括手术时间和住院时间的围手术期参数、包括融合率和颈椎前凸的放射学参数以及并发症。

结果

A组和B组的JOA评分均显著提高。接受ACDF的患者手术时间和住院时间明显更短。两组术后颈椎前凸均显著增加,融合率相同(100%)。两组均未出现重大并发症。

结论

采用FVFG的ACDF和ACCF对多节段CSM均提供了满意的临床结果和融合率。然而,多节段ACDF具有更好的放射学参数、更短的住院时间和更短的手术时间。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术相关并发症。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 1;32(21):2310-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318154c57e.
5
Anterior cervical approach for the treatment of cervical myelopathy.前路颈椎手术治疗脊髓型颈椎病
Neurosurgery. 2007 Jan;60(1 Supp1 1):S64-70. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000215399.67006.05.
6
Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.脊髓型颈椎病的手术治疗
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jul;88(7):1619-40. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00014.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验