Bendix Tom, Kjellberg Jakob, Ibsen Rikke, Jennum Poul Jørgen
Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen. Faculty of Health Sciences, Ndr. Ringvej 57, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
Danish National Institute for Local and Regional Government Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jan 14;17:24. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0877-2.
Previous studies suggest that a greater proportion of neck injury patients, whose injuries were sustained through whiplash accidents, become chronic due to a component of sickness-focusing. However, it is also possible that some of those with neck injuries were already more frail prior to the injury, resulting in more consequences from a certain intensity of injury. The objective of this study was to compare co-morbidity and mortality in people with a registered neck injury diagnosis, evaluated prior to and after the neck injury, to people without a registered neck injury evaluated at the same time-points.
From a hospital patient registry over a 12-year period, we identified those with the diagnosis 'cervical-column distortion' and matched four controls for each of them on sex, age, marital status and county of residence. For calculations of co-morbidity, those with an injury at year 1, who thus had no prior data, and for those at year 12 who did not have post data, were not included. The same applied to their individually matched controls. Health data for up to 3 years prior to and up to 3 years after the year of injury were recorded.
We identified 94,224 cases and 373,341 controls. Those with registered neck injuries had 1.2-2.0 times more co-morbidities than controls after the injury, but had already had about the same (1.3-1.8 more co-morbidities) number of co-morbidities prior to the injury. Mortality up to 12 years was approximately the same in the two groups.
Those people having a registered neck injury had more co-morbidity diagnoses both before and after the injury than those without a registered neck injury. This suggests that the co-morbidities observed after the injury may be partly related to already existing general high health care-seeking and/or a low health status, rather than being entirely the consequence of the injury.
先前的研究表明,因鞭打事故而受伤的颈部损伤患者中,有更大比例的人因专注于疾病而转为慢性损伤。然而,也有可能一些颈部受伤的人在受伤前就已经更加虚弱,以至于在受到一定强度的损伤后会产生更多后果。本研究的目的是比较有颈部损伤诊断记录的人在颈部损伤前后的合并症和死亡率,与在同一时间点评估的无颈部损伤诊断记录的人进行对比。
从一个为期12年的医院患者登记册中,我们识别出诊断为“颈椎扭曲”的患者,并为他们每人匹配4名在性别、年龄、婚姻状况和居住县方面与之相同的对照。在计算合并症时,第1年受伤因而没有先前数据的患者,以及第12年没有后续数据的患者,均未纳入。他们各自匹配的对照也是如此。记录了受伤年份前3年和受伤后3年的健康数据。
我们识别出94224例病例和373341名对照。有颈部损伤记录的患者在受伤后合并症比对照多1.2至2.0倍,但在受伤前就已经有大约相同数量(多1.3至1.8种合并症)的合并症。两组在12年内的死亡率大致相同。
有颈部损伤记录的人在受伤前后的合并症诊断都比没有颈部损伤记录的人多。这表明受伤后观察到的合并症可能部分与已存在的普遍高就医需求和/或低健康状况有关,而不完全是损伤的后果。