• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

带或不带辅助弹簧圈栓塞的管道栓塞装置:来自IntrePED注册研究的并发症分析

Pipeline Embolization Device with or without Adjunctive Coil Embolization: Analysis of Complications from the IntrePED Registry.

作者信息

Park M S, Kilburg C, Taussky P, Albuquerque F C, Kallmes D F, Levy E I, Jabbour P, Szikora I, Boccardi E, Hanel R A, Bonafé A, McDougall C G

机构信息

From the Department of Neurosurgery (M.S.P., C.K., P.T.), University of Utah Health Care, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Department of Neurosurgery (F.C.A., C.G.M.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Jun;37(6):1127-31. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4678. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

DOI:10.3174/ajnr.A4678
PMID:26767709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7963540/
Abstract

Flow diversion to treat cerebral aneurysms has revolutionized neurointerventional surgery. Because the addition of coils potentially increases the time and complexity of endovascular procedures, we sought to determine whether adjunctive coil use is associated with an increase in complications. Patients in the International Retrospective Study of Pipeline Embolization Device registry were divided into those treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device alone (n = 689 patients; n = 797 aneurysms; mean aneurysm size, 10.3 ± 7.6 mm) versus those treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device and concurrent coil embolization (n = 104 patients; n = 109 aneurysms; mean aneurysm size, 13.6 ± 7.8 mm). Patient demographics and aneurysm characteristics were examined. Rates of neurologic morbidity and mortality were compared between groups. The Pipeline Embolization Device with versus without coiling required a significantly longer procedure time (135.8 ± 63.9 versus 96.7 ± 46.2 min; P < .0001) and resulted in higher neurological morbidity (12.5% versus 7.8%; P = .13). These data suggest that either strategy represents an acceptable risk profile in the treatment of complex cerebral aneurysms and warrants further investigation.

摘要

血流导向治疗脑动脉瘤彻底改变了神经介入手术。由于增加弹簧圈可能会延长血管内手术的时间并增加其复杂性,我们试图确定辅助使用弹簧圈是否会增加并发症的发生率。国际管道栓塞装置回顾性研究登记处的患者被分为单纯接受管道栓塞装置治疗的患者(n = 689例患者;n = 797个动脉瘤;平均动脉瘤大小为10.3±7.6 mm)与接受管道栓塞装置并同时进行弹簧圈栓塞治疗的患者(n = 104例患者;n = 109个动脉瘤;平均动脉瘤大小为13.6±7.8 mm)。对患者人口统计学和动脉瘤特征进行了检查。比较了两组之间的神经功能缺损率和死亡率。使用与未使用弹簧圈的管道栓塞装置相比,手术时间显著更长(135.8±63.9对96.7±46.2分钟;P <.0001),并且导致更高的神经功能缺损率(12.5%对7.8%;P = 0.13)。这些数据表明,这两种策略在治疗复杂脑动脉瘤方面均代表了可接受的风险状况,值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Pipeline Embolization Device with or without Adjunctive Coil Embolization: Analysis of Complications from the IntrePED Registry.带或不带辅助弹簧圈栓塞的管道栓塞装置:来自IntrePED注册研究的并发症分析
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Jun;37(6):1127-31. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4678. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
2
Age-related outcomes following intracranial aneurysm treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device: a subgroup analysis of the IntrePED registry.使用Pipeline栓塞装置治疗颅内动脉瘤后的年龄相关结果:IntrePED注册研究的亚组分析
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;124(6):1726-30. doi: 10.3171/2015.5.JNS15327. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
3
Pipeline-assisted coiling versus pipeline in flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms.颅内动脉瘤血流导向治疗中管道辅助弹簧圈栓塞与单纯管道置入的比较
J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Dec;58:20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.081. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
4
Re-treatment rates after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device alone versus Pipeline and coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: a single-center experience.单纯使用 Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗与 Pipeline 和线圈栓塞治疗脑动脉瘤后的再治疗率:单中心经验。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jul;125(1):137-44. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.JNS15582. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
5
Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies.Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗颅内动脉瘤的安全性和有效性:3 项大型研究的汇总分析。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Oct;127(4):775-780. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.JNS16467. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
6
Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Posterior Circulation Aneurysms Treated With the Pipeline Embolization Device: A Subgroup Analysis of the International Retrospective Study of the Pipeline Embolization Device.后循环动脉瘤患者采用 Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗的发病率和死亡率:Pipeline 栓塞装置国际回顾性研究的亚组分析。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Sep 1;83(3):488-500. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx467.
7
Pipeline Embolization Device Versus Stent-Assisted Coiling for Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.血流导向装置与支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内动脉瘤的回顾性倾向评分匹配研究。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Sep 1;87(3):516-522. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa041.
8
Risk of Branch Occlusion and Ischemic Complications with the Pipeline Embolization Device in the Treatment of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms.Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗后循环动脉瘤的分支闭塞和缺血性并发症风险。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Jul;39(7):1303-1309. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5696. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
9
Flow Diversion for the Treatment of Basilar Apex Aneurysms.血流导向装置治疗基底动脉尖动脉瘤。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Dec 1;83(6):1298-1305. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx628.
10
Endovascular Treatment of a Fusiform Aneurysm at the M3-M4 Junction of the Middle Cerebral Artery Using the Pipeline Embolization Device.使用Pipeline栓塞装置对大脑中动脉M3-M4段梭形动脉瘤进行血管内治疗。
World Neurosurg. 2016 Feb;86:511.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.10.016. Epub 2015 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing the safety and efficacy of pipeline embolization device in pediatric aneurysms: insight from a mul-ticenter cohort and pooled analysis.分析Pipeline 栓塞装置在儿科动脉瘤中的安全性和疗效:多中心队列和汇总分析的见解。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Oct 15;166(1):412. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06306-5.
2
Clinical Outcome of Pipeline Embolization Device with and without Coils to Treat Intracranial Aneurysm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.使用和不使用弹簧圈的管道栓塞装置治疗颅内动脉瘤的临床结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Feb 3;46(2):272-277. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8443.
3
Neuroform atlas stent treatment for 533 intracranial aneurysms in a large Chinese cohort: complication risk factor analysis.Neuroform Atlas 支架治疗中国大样本量颅内动脉瘤 533 例:并发症风险因素分析。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Jun 10;24(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03695-z.
4
Evaluating Changes in Pulsatile Flow With Endovascular Stents in an In Vitro Blood Vessel Model: Potential Implications for the Future Management of Neurovascular Compression Syndromes.在体外血管模型中评估血管内支架对搏动性血流的影响:对神经血管压迫综合征未来治疗的潜在意义。
Cureus. 2024 May 7;16(5):e59811. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59811. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Clinical Outcomes On Tubridge Flow Diverter in Treatmenting Intracranial Aneurysms: a Retrospective Multicenter Registry Study.颅内动脉瘤 Tubridge 血流导向装置治疗的临床转归:一项回顾性多中心登记研究。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2024 Jun;34(2):465-474. doi: 10.1007/s00062-024-01393-4. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
6
Flow diversion for unruptured fusiform aneurysms of the proximal middle cerebral artery.大脑中动脉近端未破裂梭形动脉瘤的血流导向治疗
Front Neurol. 2023 Dec 14;14:1325983. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1325983. eCollection 2023.
7
Coiling embolization strategy for medium-to-giant-sized intracranial aneurysms treated with pipeline embolization device: a propensity score-weighted study.采用 Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗的中等至大型颅内动脉瘤的线圈栓塞策略:倾向评分加权研究。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Nov;33(11):7967-7977. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09800-z. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
8
Tubridge flow diverter alone vs. Tubridge flow diverter and coils for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A propensity score matching analysis.单纯使用Tubridge血流导向装置与联合使用Tubridge血流导向装置和弹簧圈治疗颅内动脉瘤:倾向评分匹配分析
Front Neurol. 2022 Dec 7;13:974354. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.974354. eCollection 2022.
9
Coiling followed by staged flow diversion for large and giant intracranial aneurysms.大型和巨大型颅内动脉瘤的弹簧圈栓塞术联合分期血流导向治疗
Front Neurol. 2022 Dec 1;13:1024447. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1024447. eCollection 2022.
10
Endovascular treatment of pediatric basilar artery aneurysms: case series and literature review.小儿基底动脉动脉瘤的血管内治疗:病例系列及文献综述
Childs Nerv Syst. 2023 Jan;39(1):25-34. doi: 10.1007/s00381-022-05728-9. Epub 2022 Nov 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Re-treatment rates after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device alone versus Pipeline and coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: a single-center experience.单纯使用 Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗与 Pipeline 和线圈栓塞治疗脑动脉瘤后的再治疗率:单中心经验。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jul;125(1):137-44. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.JNS15582. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
2
Concurrent use of the Pipeline Embolization Device and coils for intracranial aneurysms: technique, safety, and efficacy.用于颅内动脉瘤的Pipeline栓塞装置与弹簧圈联合使用:技术、安全性及有效性
J Neurosurg. 2015 Apr;122(4):904-11. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.JNS141259. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
3
Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline Embolization Device in 100 small intracranial aneurysms.管道栓塞装置治疗100例小型颅内动脉瘤的安全性和有效性
J Neurosurg. 2015 Jun;122(6):1498-502. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.JNS14411. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
4
Flow diverter device for the treatment of small middle cerebral artery aneurysms.用于治疗大脑中动脉小型动脉瘤的血流转向装置。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Mar;8(3):287-94. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011460. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
5
Flow-diversion for ophthalmic segment aneurysms.眼动脉段动脉瘤的血流导向治疗。
Neurosurgery. 2015 Mar;76(3):286-9; discussion 289-90. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000607.
6
Flow diversion for complex intracranial aneurysms in young children.小儿复杂颅内动脉瘤的血流导向治疗
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Mar;15(3):276-81. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.PEDS14333. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
7
Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device.使用密网支架治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤。
Neurosurgery. 2015 Feb;76(2):165-72; discussion 172. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000586.
8
International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study.管道栓塞装置的国际回顾性研究:一项多中心动脉瘤治疗研究。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Jan;36(1):108-15. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4111. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
9
Use of coils in conjunction with the pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms.联合使用线圈与管道栓塞装置治疗颅内动脉瘤。
Neurosurgery. 2015 Feb;76(2):142-9. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000579.
10
Flow diversion versus conventional treatment for carotid cavernous aneurysms.颈动脉海绵窦段动脉瘤的血流导向治疗与传统治疗对比
Stroke. 2014 Sep;45(9):2656-61. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006247. Epub 2014 Jul 22.