Noel Jean-Paul, Wallace Mark
Neuroscience Graduate Program, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA; Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA; Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA; Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Feb;82:84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
Spatial localization of touch is critically dependent upon coordinate transformation between different reference frames, which must ultimately allow for alignment between somatotopic and external representations of space. Although prior work has shown an important role for cues such as body posture in influencing the spatial localization of touch, the relative contributions of the different sensory systems to this process are unknown. In the current study, we had participants perform a tactile temporal order judgment (TOJ) under different body postures and conditions of sensory deprivation. Specifically, participants performed non-speeded judgments about the order of two tactile stimuli presented in rapid succession on their ankles during conditions in which their legs were either uncrossed or crossed (and thus bringing somatotopic and external reference frames into conflict). These judgments were made in the absence of 1) visual, 2) auditory, or 3) combined audio-visual spatial information by blindfolding and/or placing participants in an anechoic chamber. As expected, results revealed that tactile temporal acuity was poorer under crossed than uncrossed leg postures. Intriguingly, results also revealed that auditory and audio-visual deprivation exacerbated the difference in tactile temporal acuity between uncrossed to crossed leg postures, an effect not seen for visual-only deprivation. Furthermore, the effects under combined audio-visual deprivation were greater than those seen for auditory deprivation. Collectively, these results indicate that mechanisms governing the alignment between somatotopic and external reference frames extend beyond those imposed by body posture to include spatial features conveyed by the auditory and visual modalities - with a heavier weighting of auditory than visual spatial information. Thus, sensory modalities conveying exteroceptive spatial information contribute to judgments regarding the localization of touch.
触觉的空间定位严重依赖于不同参考系之间的坐标转换,这最终必须使躯体感觉空间表征与外部空间表征相互对齐。尽管先前的研究表明身体姿势等线索在影响触觉空间定位方面起着重要作用,但不同感觉系统在这一过程中的相对贡献尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们让参与者在不同的身体姿势和感觉剥夺条件下进行触觉时间顺序判断(TOJ)。具体而言,参与者在腿部未交叉或交叉(从而使躯体感觉和外部参考系产生冲突)的情况下,对快速连续出现在其脚踝上的两个触觉刺激的顺序进行非快速判断。这些判断是在参与者被蒙住眼睛和/或置于消声室中,从而没有1)视觉、2)听觉或3)视听空间信息的情况下做出的。正如预期的那样,结果显示交叉腿姿势下的触觉时间敏锐度比未交叉腿姿势下更差。有趣的是,结果还显示,听觉剥夺和视听剥夺加剧了未交叉腿姿势与交叉腿姿势之间触觉时间敏锐度的差异,而仅视觉剥夺则未观察到这种效应。此外,视听联合剥夺下的效应大于听觉剥夺下的效应。总体而言,这些结果表明,控制躯体感觉参考系与外部参考系对齐的机制不仅包括身体姿势所施加的机制,还包括听觉和视觉模态所传达的空间特征——其中听觉空间信息的权重比视觉空间信息更大。因此,传达外感受性空间信息的感觉模态有助于触觉定位的判断。