Similowski T, Fleury B, Launois S, Cathala H P, Bouche P, Derenne J P
Service de Pneumologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpétrié, Paris, France.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1989 Oct;67(4):1311-8. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1989.67.4.1311.
Assessing diaphragmatic contractility is a common goal in various situations. This assessment is mainly based on static or dynamic maximal voluntary maneuvers and twitch transdiaphragmatic pressures (Pdi) obtained by stimulation of the phrenic nerves (PS). PS eliminates the central components of diaphragmatic activation, but the available techniques of PS remain subject to some limitations. Transcutaneous PS is painful, and needle PS is potentially dangerous. Time-varying magnetic fields can stimulate nervous structures without pain and without adverse effects. In six subjects, we have studied cervical magnetic stimulation (CMS) as a method of PS. We have compared the stimulated Pdi (Pdistim) with the maximal Pdi obtained during static combined expulsive-Mueller maneuver (Pdimax) and with the Pdi generated during a sniff test (Pdisniff). CMS produced twitch Pdi averaging 33.4 +/- 9.7 cmH2O. Pdistim/Pdimax and Pdistim/Pdisniff were 24 +/- 6 and 41 +/- 14%, respectively. These values are comparable to those obtained in other studies with transcutaneous PS. They were highly reproducible in all the subjects. Electromyographic data provided evidence of bilateral maximal stimulation. CMS is a nonspecific method and may stimulate various nervous structures. However, diaphragmatic contraction was elicited by stimulation of the phrenic trunk, since the phrenicodiaphragmatic latencies (less than 7 ms) were in the range of values reported with direct stimulation of the trunk. Cocontraction of neck muscles, including the sternomastoid, was present, but its influence in the CMS-induced Pdi seems minimal. We conclude that magnetic stimulation is an easy, well-tolerated, reproducible safe, and valuable method to assess phrenic conduction and diaphragmatic twitch response.
评估膈肌收缩力是多种情况下的一个常见目标。这种评估主要基于静态或动态的最大自主动作以及通过膈神经刺激(PS)获得的抽搐跨膈压(Pdi)。PS消除了膈肌激活的中枢成分,但现有的PS技术仍存在一些局限性。经皮PS会引起疼痛,而针电极PS有潜在危险。时变磁场可以刺激神经结构而无疼痛且无不良影响。在六名受试者中,我们研究了颈部磁刺激(CMS)作为一种PS方法。我们将刺激后的Pdi(Pdistim)与静态联合呼气 - 米勒动作期间获得的最大Pdi(Pdimax)以及嗅探测试期间产生的Pdi(Pdisniff)进行了比较。CMS产生的抽搐Pdi平均为33.4±9.7 cmH₂O。Pdistim/Pdimax和Pdistim/Pdisniff分别为24±6%和41±14%。这些值与其他经皮PS研究中获得的值相当。它们在所有受试者中都具有高度可重复性。肌电图数据提供了双侧最大刺激的证据。CMS是一种非特异性方法,可能刺激各种神经结构。然而,由于膈 - 膈肌潜伏期(小于7毫秒)在直接刺激膈干所报告的值范围内,所以通过刺激膈干引发了膈肌收缩。包括胸锁乳突肌在内的颈部肌肉存在共同收缩,但其对CMS诱导的Pdi的影响似乎最小。我们得出结论,磁刺激是一种评估膈神经传导和膈肌抽搐反应的简便、耐受性好、可重复、安全且有价值的方法。