Perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and the clinical value of laparoscopic surgery and traditional abdominal surgery for the treatment of endometrial carcinoma. Meanwhile, assessing the value of preoperative MRI in the depth of myometrial invasion of endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS

we retrospectively analyzed 32 patients with endometrial carcinoma who underwent laparoscopic surgery in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in the Subei People's Hospital from September 2008 to March 2015, comparing data using the same surgeons' traditional laparotomy cases during the same period. Data collected includes patient demography, intraoperative and postoperative clinical parameters and follow-up data.

RESULT

All laparoscopic and laparotomy surgery were successful. laparoscopic surgery was better than traditional surgery with less blood loss, more early postoperative anal exhaust time, less postoperative hospital stay, and no seriously complications, there were significant differences (all P<0.05). The average operative time, in the laparoscopy group, was a little longer than the laparotomy group with no statistical significance (P>0.05). There were no differences in the two groups in terms of the number of excised lymph nodes and the recurrence and mortality rate (P>0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of the MRI imaging in assessment of deep myometrial invasion of endometrial carcinoma were 89.3% and 96.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared to conventional approaches, laparoscopic surgery showed favorable short-term outcomes with comparable survival. People with endometrial cancer can, therefore, be as safely managed using laparoscopy as laparotomy. MRI is of high value in assessing deep myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma.