Suppr超能文献

骨科患者的麻醉护理:护理是否存在潜在差异?

Anesthetic Care for Orthopedic Patients: Is There a Potential for Differences in Care?

机构信息

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York (S.G.M., M.O.); and Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York (J.P., N.Z., R.R., M.M.).

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2016 Mar;124(3):608-23. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001004.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Differences in health care represent a major health policy issue. Despite increasing evidence on the mediating role of anesthesia type used for surgery on perioperative outcome, there is a lack of data on potential care differences in this field. The authors aimed to determine whether anesthesia practice (use of neuraxial anesthesia [NA] or peripheral nerve block [PNB]) differs by patient and hospital factors.

METHODS

The authors extracted data on n = 1,062,152 hip and knee arthroplasty procedures from the Premier Perspective database (2006 to 2013). Multilevel multivariable logistic regression models measured associations (odds ratios [ORs] and 95% CIs) between patient/hospital factors and NA or PNB use.

RESULTS

Of all patients, 22.2% (n = 236,083) received NA and 17.9% (n = 189,732) received PNB. Lower adjusted odds for receiving NA were seen for black patients (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.91) and those on Medicaid (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.82) or without insurance (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.98). Furthermore, teaching hospitals (compared with nonteaching hospitals) had lower adjusted odds for NA utilization (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.89). Although generally similar patterns were seen for PNB utilization, the main difference was that particularly Hispanic patients were less likely to receive PNB compared with white patients (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.65). Sensitivity analyses generally validated our results.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences exist in the provision of regional anesthetic care with factors such as race and insurance type being important determinants of anesthetic practice. Further and in-depth research is needed to fully assess the background of these differences.

摘要

背景

医疗保健方面的差异是一个主要的医疗政策问题。尽管越来越多的证据表明手术中使用的麻醉类型对围手术期结果具有中介作用,但在该领域,关于潜在护理差异的数据仍然缺乏。作者旨在确定麻醉实践(使用椎管内麻醉[NA]或周围神经阻滞[PNB])是否因患者和医院因素而有所不同。

方法

作者从 Premier Perspective 数据库(2006 年至 2013 年)中提取了 1,062,152 例髋关节和膝关节置换术的数据。多水平多变量逻辑回归模型测量了患者/医院因素与 NA 或 PNB 使用之间的关联(比值比[OR]和 95%置信区间[CI])。

结果

在所有患者中,22.2%(n=236,083)接受了 NA,17.9%(n=189,732)接受了 PNB。黑人患者(OR,0.88;95%CI,0.86 至 0.91)和接受医疗补助(OR,0.78;95%CI,0.74 至 0.82)或无保险(OR,0.89;95%CI,0.81 至 0.98)的患者接受 NA 的调整后可能性较小。此外,教学医院(与非教学医院相比)接受 NA 治疗的调整后可能性较低(OR,0.35;95%CI,0.14 至 0.89)。尽管 PNB 使用率的总体模式相似,但主要区别在于,与白人患者相比,西班牙裔患者接受 PNB 的可能性较小(OR,0.60;95%CI,0.56 至 0.65)。敏感性分析普遍验证了我们的结果。

结论

在提供区域麻醉护理方面存在显著差异,种族和保险类型等因素是麻醉实践的重要决定因素。需要进一步深入研究,以充分评估这些差异的背景。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验