Thomas Kevin J
Department of Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University, 211 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16801 (
J Marriage Fam. 2016 Feb;78(1):75-90. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12268. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
Using recent data from the American Community Survey, the author investigated how the dynamics of immigration influence our understanding of the adoption-schooling relationship. The results suggest that implications of immigrant and adoption statuses could be understood within specific familial contexts. Thus, no statistical differences were found in the outcomes of foreign-born adoptees in U.S. native families and their peers with immigrant parents. Instead, the most favorable patterns of schooling progress were found among U.S.-born adoptees living in immigrant families. Among immigrants, the analysis indicated similar patterns of achievement among Hispanic and White adoptees that are inconsistent with the predictions of segmented assimilation theory. However, there was a Hispanic disadvantage relative to Whites among immigrant children living with biological and stepparents. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of these findings for kinship selection and assimilation processes and the contention that alternative theoretical frameworks should be used to understand the implications of adoption status.
作者利用美国社区调查的最新数据,研究了移民动态如何影响我们对收养与教育关系的理解。结果表明,移民和收养状况的影响可以在特定的家庭背景中得到理解。因此,在美国原生家庭中出生的外国收养儿童与其有移民父母的同龄人在学业成果上没有发现统计学差异。相反,在移民家庭中生活的美国出生的收养儿童中发现了最有利的学业进步模式。在移民群体中,分析表明西班牙裔和白人收养儿童的成绩模式相似,这与分段同化理论的预测不一致。然而,在与亲生父母和继父母一起生活的移民儿童中,西班牙裔相对于白人处于劣势。文章最后讨论了这些发现对亲属关系选择和同化过程的影响,以及主张应使用替代理论框架来理解收养状况的影响。