Lyons Benjamin A, Veenstra Aaron S
1 College of Mass Communication & Media Arts, Southern Illinois University Carbondale , Carbondale, Illinois.
2 School of Journalism, Southern Illinois University Carbondale , Carbondale, Illinois.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016 Jan;19(1):8-15. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0319.
Politicians' Twitter habits can vary considerably. Those who choose to use may do so as part of a broad discussion community or as a one-to-many broadcaster. Because each user sees a different mix of tweets, a politician seen by one user as interacting with the public may be seen by another as engaging in one-way communication, potentially prompting different evaluations of the politician, the ongoing discussion, or even Twitter itself. This study uses an experiment to test the effects of different engagement and framing styles in politician tweets on evaluations of the politician, other discussants, and Twitter itself. Findings suggest that politicians who use Twitter to broadcast, rather than engage with other users, not only receive worse evaluations themselves but that the negative evaluation carries over to other users discussing the same topics, as well as to evaluations of the utility of Twitter as an information source. This effect is attributed to intramedium interaction, in which reactions to one aspect of a multimedia object carry over to other aspects of the same object.
政治家使用推特的习惯可能有很大差异。那些选择使用推特的人,可能是作为广泛讨论社区的一部分来使用,也可能是作为一对多的传播者。由于每个用户看到的推文组合不同,一个用户认为与公众互动的政治家,在另一个用户看来可能是在进行单向交流,这可能会引发对该政治家、正在进行的讨论,甚至推特本身的不同评价。本研究通过实验来测试政治家推文中不同的参与方式和框架风格对政治家、其他讨论者以及推特本身评价的影响。研究结果表明,使用推特进行广播而非与其他用户互动的政治家,不仅自身会得到更差的评价,而且这种负面评价会延伸到讨论相同话题的其他用户,以及对推特作为信息来源实用性的评价。这种效应归因于媒介内互动,即对多媒体对象一个方面的反应会延伸到同一对象的其他方面。