• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2015年哥伦比亚选举中的意识形态消费主义:政治意识形态、推特活动与选举结果之间的联系

Ideological Consumerism in Colombian Elections, 2015: Links Between Political Ideology, Twitter Activity, and Electoral Results.

作者信息

Correa Juan C, Camargo Jorge E

机构信息

1 Facultad de Psicología, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz , Bogotá, Colombia .

2 Facultad de Matemáticas e Ingenierías, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz , Bogotá, Colombia .

出版信息

Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017 Jan;20(1):37-43. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0402.

DOI:10.1089/cyber.2016.0402
PMID:28080152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5329052/
Abstract

Propagation of political ideologies in social networks has shown a substantial impact on voting behavior. Both the contents of the messages (the ideology) and the politicians' influence on their online audiences (their followers) have been associated with such an impact. In this study we evaluate which of these factors exerted a major role in deciding electoral results of the 2015 Colombian regional elections by evaluating the linguistic similarity of political ideologies and their influence on the Twitter sphere. The electoral results proved to be strongly associated with tweets and retweets and not with the linguistic content of their ideologies or politicians' followers in Twitter. Finally, suggestions for new ways to analyze electoral processes are discussed.

摘要

政治意识形态在社交网络中的传播已显示出对投票行为有重大影响。信息内容(意识形态)以及政治家对其在线受众(其追随者)的影响都与这种影响相关。在本研究中,我们通过评估政治意识形态的语言相似性及其在推特领域的影响,来评估这些因素中哪一个在决定2015年哥伦比亚地区选举的选举结果中发挥了主要作用。选举结果被证明与推文和转发密切相关,而与推特上意识形态的语言内容或政治家的追随者无关。最后,讨论了分析选举过程新方法的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5c/5329052/34cb8341c811/fig-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5c/5329052/fa6b1cc9ad4b/fig-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5c/5329052/b859e6796fd3/fig-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5c/5329052/34cb8341c811/fig-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5c/5329052/fa6b1cc9ad4b/fig-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5c/5329052/b859e6796fd3/fig-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5c/5329052/34cb8341c811/fig-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Ideological Consumerism in Colombian Elections, 2015: Links Between Political Ideology, Twitter Activity, and Electoral Results.2015年哥伦比亚选举中的意识形态消费主义:政治意识形态、推特活动与选举结果之间的联系
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017 Jan;20(1):37-43. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0402.
2
Characterizing and modeling an electoral campaign in the context of Twitter: 2011 Spanish Presidential election as a case study.在 Twitter 背景下刻画和建模竞选活动:以 2011 年西班牙总统选举为例的研究
Chaos. 2012 Jun;22(2):023138. doi: 10.1063/1.4729139.
3
A comparative framework to analyze convergence on Twitter electoral conversations.分析 Twitter 选举对话趋同的比较框架。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 9;12(1):19062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21861-6.
4
Social media analysis during political turbulence.政治动荡期间的社交媒体分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 31;12(10):e0186836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186836. eCollection 2017.
5
An ideological asymmetry in the diffusion of moralized content on social media among political leaders.社交媒体上政治领袖传播道德化内容的思想不对称。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Oct;148(10):1802-1813. doi: 10.1037/xge0000532. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
6
Ideological differences in engagement in public debate on Twitter.在 Twitter 上参与公共辩论的意识形态差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0249241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249241. eCollection 2021.
7
Who polarizes Twitter? Ideological polarization, partisan groups and strategic networked campaigning on Twitter during the 2017 and 2021 German Federal elections 'Bundestagswahlen'.谁在使推特两极分化?2017年和2021年德国联邦议院选举期间推特上的意识形态两极分化、党派团体与策略性网络竞选活动
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022;12(1):151. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00958-w. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
8
The limited reach of fake news on Twitter during 2019 European elections.2019 年欧洲选举期间推特上虚假新闻的传播范围有限。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 18;15(6):e0234689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234689. eCollection 2020.
9
Colombian political leaders on Twitter during the Covid-19 pandemic.哥伦比亚政治领导人在新冠疫情期间使用推特的情况。
Lat Am Policy. 2022 May;13(1):104-121. doi: 10.1111/lamp.12249. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
10
What Tweets and YouTube comments have in common? Sentiment and graph analysis on data related to US elections 2020.推文和 YouTube 评论有何共同之处?对与 2020 年美国大选相关数据的情感和图分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 31;18(1):e0270542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270542. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotions and virality: Social transmission of political messages on Twitter.情感与传播力:推特上政治信息的社会传播
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 11;13:931921. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.931921. eCollection 2022.
2
Advantageous comparison: using Twitter responses to understand similarities between cybercriminals ("Yahoo Boys") and politicians ("Yahoo men").有利的比较:利用推特回复来理解网络犯罪分子(“雅虎男孩”)和政客(“雅虎人”)之间的相似之处。
Heliyon. 2022 Oct 18;8(11):e11142. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11142. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Propagating and Debunking Conspiracy Theories on Twitter During the 2015-2016 Zika Virus Outbreak.

本文引用的文献

1
Field experiment evidence of substantive, attributional, and behavioral persuasion by members of Congress in online town halls.国会议员在在线市政厅会议中进行实质性、归因性和行为说服的实地实验证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 31;112(13):3937-42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418188112. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
2
A multi-level geographical study of Italian political elections from Twitter data.基于推特数据的意大利政治选举多层次地理研究。
PLoS One. 2014 May 6;9(5):e95809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095809. eCollection 2014.
3
Zipf's word frequency law in natural language: a critical review and future directions.
在 2015-2016 年寨卡病毒爆发期间在 Twitter 上传播和揭穿阴谋论。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 Aug;21(8):485-490. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0669. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
自然语言中的齐普夫词频定律:批判性综述与未来方向
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Oct;21(5):1112-30. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0585-6.
4
A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization.一项涉及 6100 万人的社会影响和政治动员实验。
Nature. 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):295-8. doi: 10.1038/nature11421.