Sivamurthy Gautham, Sundari Shantha
School of Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, Scotland.
Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, No. 162, Poonamallee High Road, Chennai, 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
Prog Orthod. 2016;17:4. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0117-1. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stress patterns produced in mini-implant and alveolar bone, for various implant dimensions, under different directions of simulated orthodontic force, using a three-dimensional finite element method.
Eight finite element (FE) models of mini-implant and bone were generated with insertion angles of 30° and 60°, diameters of 1 and 1.3 mm, and lengths of 6 and 8 mm. A simulated constant orthodontic force of 2 N was applied to each of these FE models in three directions simulating anterior retraction, anterior intrusion and retraction, and molar intrusion.
Comparison of the maximum von Mises stress in the mini-implant showed that the 1-mm diameter produced significantly high stress, and the amount of stress produced was more for a mini-implant inserted at an angle of 60°. The cortical bone showed that high stresses were generated for the 1-mm-diameter mini-implant and on increasing the insertion angulation from 30° to 60°, the stress produced increased as well. The comparison of von Mises stress in the cancellous bone was insignificant as the amount of stress transmitted was very low.
The 1-mm-diameter mini-implants are not safe to be used clinically for orthodontic anchorage. The 1.3 × 6 mm dimension mini-implants are recommended for use during anterior segment retraction and during simultaneous intrusion and retraction, and the 1.3 × 8 mm dimension mini-implant is recommended for use during molar intrusion. All mini-implants should be inserted at a 30° angle into the bone for reduced stress and improved stability.
本研究旨在使用三维有限元方法,评估在不同模拟正畸力方向下,各种种植体尺寸的微型种植体和牙槽骨中产生的应力模式。
生成八个微型种植体和骨的有限元(FE)模型,其植入角度为30°和60°,直径为1和1.3毫米,长度为6和8毫米。在模拟前牙后缩、前牙压低和后缩以及磨牙压低的三个方向上,对每个有限元模型施加2N的模拟恒定正畸力。
微型种植体中最大冯·米塞斯应力的比较表明,直径1毫米的种植体产生的应力明显较高,并且以60°角植入的微型种植体产生的应力更大。皮质骨显示,直径1毫米的微型种植体产生高应力,并且随着植入角度从30°增加到60°,产生的应力也增加。松质骨中冯·米塞斯应力的比较不显著,因为传递的应力非常低。
直径1毫米的微型种植体在临床上用于正畸支抗不安全。建议在前段后缩以及同时压低和后缩过程中使用尺寸为1.3×6毫米的微型种植体,在磨牙压低过程中建议使用尺寸为1.3×8毫米的微型种植体。所有微型种植体都应以30°角植入骨中,以降低应力并提高稳定性。