a PhD, is Emeritus Professor of Health Sociology at the Department of Sociology , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.
SAHARA J. 2016;13(1):8-16. doi: 10.1080/17290376.2015.1130644.
Although stigma and its relationship to health and disease is not a new phenomenon, it has not been a major feature in the public discourse until the emergence of HIV. The range of negative responses associated with the epidemic placed stigma on the public agenda and drew attention to its complexity as a phenomenon and concept worthy of further investigation. Despite the consensus that stigma is one of the major contributors to the rapid spread of HIV and the frequent use of the term in the media and among people in the street, the exact meaning of 'stigma' remains ambiguous. The aim of this paper is to briefly re-visit some of the scholarly deliberations and further interrogate their relevance in explaining HIV-related stigma evidenced in South Africa. In conclusion a model is presented. Its usefulness--or explanatory potential--is that it attempts to provide a comprehensive framework that offers insights into the individual as well as the social/structural components of HIV-related stigma in a particular context. As such, it has the potential to provide more nuanced understandings as well as to alert us to knowledge-gaps in the process.
虽然污名及其与健康和疾病的关系并不是一个新现象,但直到艾滋病病毒出现之前,它并不是公众话语的主要特征。与该流行病相关的一系列负面反应使污名成为公众议程的一个议题,并引起了人们的关注,认为它是一种值得进一步研究的复杂现象和概念。尽管人们一致认为污名是导致艾滋病毒迅速传播的主要因素之一,而且该术语在媒体和街头人群中经常被使用,但“污名”的确切含义仍然模糊不清。本文的目的是简要地重新审视一些学术讨论,并进一步探讨它们在解释南非艾滋病相关污名方面的相关性。最后提出了一个模型。它的有用性或解释潜力在于,它试图提供一个全面的框架,提供对个人以及特定背景下与艾滋病毒相关的污名的社会/结构组成部分的见解。因此,它有可能提供更细微的理解,并提醒我们注意这一过程中的知识空白。