McKeown Clare, Gillen Gerry, Dempsey Mary Frances, Findlay Caroline
West of Scotland PET Centre, Tom Wheldon Building, Gartnavel General Hospital, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK.
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Feb 7;61(3):1259-77. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/3/1259. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
PET scans use overlapping acquisition beds to correct for reduced sensitivity at bed edges. The optimum overlap size for the General Electric (GE) Discovery 690 has not been established. This study assesses how image quality is affected by slice overlap. Efficacy of 23% overlaps (recommended by GE) and 49% overlaps (maximum possible overlap) were specifically assessed. European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) guidelines for calculating minimum injected activities based on overlap size were also reviewed. A uniform flood phantom was used to assess noise (coefficient of variation, (COV)) and voxel accuracy (activity concentrations, Bq ml(-1)). A NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturers Association) body phantom with hot/cold spheres in a background activity was used to assess contrast recovery coefficients (CRCs) and signal to noise ratios (SNR). Different overlap sizes and sphere-to-background ratios were assessed. COVs for 49% and 23% overlaps were 9% and 13% respectively. This increased noise was difficult to visualise on the 23% overlap images. Mean voxel activity concentrations were not affected by overlap size. No clinically significant differences in CRCs were observed. However, visibility and SNR of small, low contrast spheres (⩽13 mm diameter, 2:1 sphere to background ratio) may be affected by overlap size in low count studies if they are located in the overlap area. There was minimal detectable influence on image quality in terms of noise, mean activity concentrations or mean CRCs when comparing 23% overlap with 49% overlap. Detectability of small, low contrast lesions may be affected in low count studies-however, this is a worst-case scenario. The marginal benefits of increasing overlap from 23% to 49% are likely to be offset by increased patient scan times. A 23% overlap is therefore appropriate for clinical use. An amendment to EANM guidelines for calculating injected activities is also proposed which better reflects the effect overlap size has on image noise.
正电子发射断层扫描(PET)使用重叠采集床位来校正床位边缘处降低的灵敏度。通用电气(GE)Discovery 690的最佳重叠尺寸尚未确定。本研究评估了层面重叠如何影响图像质量。具体评估了23%重叠(GE推荐)和49%重叠(最大可能重叠)的效果。还回顾了欧洲核医学协会(EANM)基于重叠尺寸计算最小注射活度的指南。使用均匀的泛源体模评估噪声(变异系数,COV)和体素准确性(活度浓度,Bq ml⁻¹)。使用带有背景活度中热/冷球体的美国国家电气制造商协会(NEMA)体模评估对比度恢复系数(CRC)和信噪比(SNR)。评估了不同的重叠尺寸和球体与背景比值。49%和23%重叠的COV分别为9%和13%。这种增加的噪声在23%重叠图像上难以显现。平均体素活度浓度不受重叠尺寸影响。未观察到CRC有临床显著差异。然而,在低计数研究中,如果小的、低对比度球体(直径⩽13毫米,球体与背景比值为2:1)位于重叠区域,其可见性和SNR可能会受到重叠尺寸的影响。将23%重叠与49%重叠进行比较时,在噪声、平均活度浓度或平均CRC方面对图像质量的可检测影响极小。在低计数研究中,小的、低对比度病变的可检测性可能会受到影响——然而,这是最坏的情况。将重叠从23%增加到49%的边际益处可能会被患者扫描时间增加所抵消。因此,23%的重叠适用于临床使用。还提出了对EANM计算注射活度指南的修订,以更好地反映重叠尺寸对图像噪声的影响。