Sickel Wiebke, Grafe T Ulmar, Meuche Ivonne, Steffan-Dewenter Ingolf, Keller Alexander
Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, 97074, Würzburg, Germany.
Faculty of Science, University Brunei Darussalam, Tungku Link, Gadong, BE, 1410, Brunei.
Microb Ecol. 2016 May;71(4):938-53. doi: 10.1007/s00248-015-0723-3. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
Carnivorous plants of the genus Nepenthes have been studied for over a century, but surprisingly little is known about associations with microorganisms. The two species Nepenthes rafflesiana and Nepenthes hemsleyana differ in their pitcher-mediated nutrient sources, sequestering nitrogen from arthropod prey and arthropods as well as bat faeces, respectively. We expected bacterial communities living in the pitchers to resemble this diet difference. Samples were taken from different parts of the pitchers (leaf, peristome, inside, outside, digestive fluid) of both species. Bacterial communities were determined using culture-independent high-throughput amplicon sequencing. Bacterial richness and community structure were similar in leaves, peristomes, inside and outside walls of both plant species. Regarding digestive fluids, bacterial richness was higher in N. hemsleyana than in N. rafflesiana. Additionally, digestive fluid communities were highly variable in structure, with strain-specific differences in community composition between replicates. Acidophilic taxa were mostly of low abundance, except the genus Acidocella, which strikingly reached extremely high levels in two N. rafflesiana fluids. In N. hemsleyana fluid, some taxa classified as vertebrate gut symbionts as well as saprophytes were enriched compared to N. rafflesiana, with saprophytes constituting potential competitors for nutrients. The high variation in community structure might be caused by a number of biotic and abiotic factors. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria were present in both study species, which might provide essential nutrients to the plant at times of low prey capture and/or rare encounters with bats.
猪笼草属的食肉植物已经被研究了一个多世纪,但令人惊讶的是,人们对其与微生物的关联知之甚少。莱佛士猪笼草和赫姆斯利猪笼草这两个物种在其捕虫笼介导的营养来源上有所不同,分别从节肢动物猎物、节肢动物以及蝙蝠粪便中获取氮。我们预计生活在捕虫笼中的细菌群落会与这种饮食差异相似。从这两个物种捕虫笼的不同部位(叶片、唇、内部、外部、消化液)采集样本。使用不依赖培养的高通量扩增子测序来确定细菌群落。两种植物的叶片、唇、内壁和外壁中的细菌丰富度和群落结构相似。至于消化液,赫姆斯利猪笼草中的细菌丰富度高于莱佛士猪笼草。此外,消化液群落的结构高度可变,重复样本之间的群落组成存在菌株特异性差异。嗜酸类群大多丰度较低,除了嗜酸菌属,该属在两份莱佛士猪笼草的消化液中显著达到极高水平。在赫姆斯利猪笼草的消化液中,一些被归类为脊椎动物肠道共生菌以及腐生菌的类群相对于莱佛士猪笼草有所富集,腐生菌构成了潜在的营养竞争者。群落结构的高度变化可能是由多种生物和非生物因素造成的。两种研究物种中都存在固氮细菌,在猎物捕获量低和/或很少遇到蝙蝠时,这些细菌可能为植物提供必需的营养。