Gordon Lori A, Malati Christine Y, Hadigan Colleen, McLaughlin Mary, Alfaro Raul M, Calderón Mónica M, Kovacs Joseph A, Penzak Scott R
Pharmacy Department, NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Laboratory of Immunoregulation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Jan;36(1):49-56. doi: 10.1002/phar.1682.
Because we previously observed a significant 41% reduction in gemfibrozil exposure after 2 weeks of lopinavir-ritonavir administration, we sought to determine the influence of lopinavir-ritonavir and ritonavir alone on the pharmacokinetics of fenofibric acid, an alternative to gemfibrozil for the treatment of elevated triglyceride levels.
Open-label, single-sequence pharmacokinetic study.
Clinical Research Center at the National Institutes of Health.
Thirteen healthy adult volunteers.
Subjects received a single oral dose of fenofibrate 145 mg during three study phases: before ritonavir administration, after 2 weeks of administration of ritonavir 100 mg twice/day, and after 2 weeks of administration of lopinavir 400 mg-ritonavir 100 mg twice/day.
Serial blood samples were collected over 120 hours for determination of fenofibric acid concentrations. Fenofibric acid pharmacokinetic parameter values were compared before and after concomitant ritonavir or lopinavir-ritonavir administration. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for fenofibric acid area under the plasma concentration-time curve were 0.89 (0.77-1.01) after 14 days of ritonavir alone compared with baseline (p>0.05) and 0.87 (0.69-1.05) after 14 days of lopinavir-ritonavir compared with baseline (p>0.05). Study drugs were generally well tolerated; all adverse events were mild or moderate, transient, and resolved without intervention.
In contrast to a significant interaction between gemfibrozil and lopinavir-ritonavir, neither lopinavir-ritonavir nor ritonavir alone altered the pharmacokinetics of fenofibric acid in healthy volunteers. These data suggest that fenofibrate remains an important option in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients receiving common ritonavir-boosted therapy.
由于我们之前观察到在给予洛匹那韦 - 利托那韦2周后吉非贝齐的暴露量显著降低了41%,我们试图确定洛匹那韦 - 利托那韦及单独使用利托那韦对非诺贝特酸药代动力学的影响,非诺贝特酸是治疗甘油三酯水平升高的一种替代吉非贝齐的药物。
开放标签、单序列药代动力学研究。
美国国立卫生研究院临床研究中心。
13名健康成年志愿者。
受试者在三个研究阶段接受单次口服145毫克非诺贝特:在给予利托那韦之前、在每天两次给予100毫克利托那韦2周后、以及在每天两次给予400毫克洛匹那韦 - 100毫克利托那韦2周后。
在120小时内采集系列血样以测定非诺贝特酸浓度。比较了同时给予利托那韦或洛匹那韦 - 利托那韦前后非诺贝特酸的药代动力学参数值。与基线相比,单独使用利托那韦14天后非诺贝特酸血浆浓度 - 时间曲线下面积的几何平均比值(90%置信区间)为0.89(0.77 - 1.01)(p>0.05),洛匹那韦 - 利托那韦14天后为0.87(0.69 - 1.05)(p>0.05)。研究药物总体耐受性良好;所有不良事件均为轻度或中度、短暂性的,且无需干预即可缓解。
与吉非贝齐和洛匹那韦 - 利托那韦之间的显著相互作用不同,单独使用洛匹那韦 - 利托那韦或利托那韦均未改变健康志愿者中非诺贝特酸的药代动力学。这些数据表明,在接受常见的利托那韦增效治疗的人类免疫缺陷病毒感染患者中,非诺贝特仍然是一个重要的选择。