Ek Anna, Sorjonen Kimmo, Eli Karin, Lindberg Louise, Nyman Jonna, Marcus Claude, Nowicka Paulina
Division of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 22;11(1):e0147257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147257. eCollection 2016.
Insight into parents' perceptions of their children's eating behaviors is crucial for the development of successful childhood obesity programs. However, links between children's eating behaviors and parental feeding practices and concerns have yet to be established. This study aims to examine associations between parental perceptions of preschoolers' eating behaviors and parental feeding practices. First, it tests the original 8-factor structure of the Child Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CEBQ). Second, it examines the associations with parental feeding practices, measured with the Child Feeding Questionnaire (CFQ).
Questionnaires were sent to parents from 25 schools/preschools in Stockholm, Sweden and to parents starting a childhood obesity intervention. The CEBQ factor structure was tested with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Associations between CEBQ subscales Food approach and Food avoidance and CFQ factors Restriction, Pressure to eat and Monitoring were examined with structural equation modelling (SEM), adjusting for child and parental characteristics, and parental confidence, measured with the Lifestyle Behavior Checklist (LBC). CFQ Concern for child weight and Perceived responsibility for child eating were used as mediators.
478 parents completed the questionnaires (children: 52% girls, mean age 5.5 years, 20% overweight/obese). A modified 8-factor structure showed an acceptable fit (TLI = 0.91, CFI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.05 and SRMR = 0.06) after dropping one item and allowing three pairs of error terms to correlate. The SEM model demonstrated that Food approach had a weak direct effect on Restriction, but a moderate (β = 0.30) indirect effect via Concern, resulting in a substantial total effect (β = 0.37). Food avoidance had a strong positive effect on Pressure to eat (β = 0.71).
The CEBQ is a valid instrument for assessing parental perceptions of preschoolers' eating behaviors. Parental pressure to eat was strongly associated with children's food avoidance. Parental restriction, however, was more strongly associated with parents' concerns about their children's weights than with children's food approach. This suggests that childhood obesity interventions should address parents' perceptions of healthy weight alongside perceptions of healthy eating.
深入了解父母对其子女饮食行为的看法对于成功开展儿童肥胖项目至关重要。然而,儿童饮食行为与父母喂养方式及担忧之间的联系尚未确立。本研究旨在探讨父母对学龄前儿童饮食行为的看法与父母喂养方式之间的关联。首先,对儿童饮食行为问卷(CEBQ)最初的8因素结构进行检验。其次,研究其与用儿童喂养问卷(CFQ)测量的父母喂养方式之间的关联。
向瑞典斯德哥尔摩25所学校/幼儿园的家长以及开始接受儿童肥胖干预的家长发放问卷。用验证性因子分析(CFA)对CEBQ的因子结构进行检验。采用结构方程模型(SEM)研究CEBQ分量表“对食物的趋近”和“对食物的回避”与CFQ因子“限制”“进食压力”和“监控”之间的关联,并对儿童和父母的特征以及用生活方式行为清单(LBC)测量的父母信心进行调整。CFQ中“对儿童体重的关注”和“对儿童饮食的感知责任”用作中介变量。
478名家长完成了问卷(儿童:52%为女孩,平均年龄5.5岁,20%超重/肥胖)。剔除一个项目并允许三对误差项相关后,修改后的8因素结构显示出可接受的拟合度(TLI = 0.91,CFI = 0.92,RMSEA = 0.05,SRMR = 0.06)。SEM模型表明,“对食物的趋近”对“限制”有微弱的直接影响,但通过“关注”有中等程度的间接影响(β = 0.30),从而产生显著的总效应(β = 0.37)。“对食物的回避”对“进食压力”有强烈的正向影响(β = 0.71)。
CEBQ是评估父母对学龄前儿童饮食行为看法的有效工具。父母的进食压力与儿童对食物的回避密切相关。然而,父母的限制与父母对孩子体重的担忧关联更强,而非与儿童对食物的趋近关联更强。这表明儿童肥胖干预应在关注健康饮食观念的同时,解决父母对健康体重的看法问题。