Koike Soichi, Matsumoto Masatoshi, Ide Hiroo, Kashima Saori, Atarashi Hidenao, Yasunaga Hideo
Division of Health Policy and Management, Center for Community Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Department of Health Management and Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Int J Health Geogr. 2016 Jan 22;15:4. doi: 10.1186/s12942-016-0035-y.
In Japan, the number of obstetrics facilities has steadily decreased and the selection and concentration of obstetrics facilities is progressing rapidly. Obstetrics services should be concentrated in fewer hospitals to improve quality of care and reduce the workload of obstetricians. However, the impact of this intensification of services on access to obstetrics hospitals is not known. We undertook a simulation to examine how the intensification of obstetrics services would affect access to hospitals based on a variety of scenarios, and the implications for health policy.
The female population aged between 15 and 49 living within a 30-min drive of an obstetrics hospital was calculated using a Geographic Information System for three possible intensification scenarios: Scenario 1 retained facilities with a higher volume of deliveries without considering the geographic boundaries of Medical Service Areas (MSAs, zones of healthcare administration and management); Scenario 2 prioritized retaining at least one hospital in each MSA and then retained higher delivery volume institutions, while Scenario 3 retained facilities to maximize population coverage using location-allocation modeling. We also assessed the impact of concentrating services in academic hospitals and specialist perinatal medical centers (PMCs) alone.
In 2011, 95.0% of women aged 15-49 years lived within a 30-min drive of one of 1075 obstetrics hospitals. This would fall to 82.7% if obstetrics services were intensified into academic hospitals and general and regional PMCs. If 55.0% of institutions provided obstetrics services, the coverage would be 87.6% in Scenario 1, whereas intensification based on access would achieve over 90.5% coverage in Scenario 2 and 93.9% in Scenario 3.
Intensification of obstetrics facilities impairs access, but a greater caseload and better staffing have the potential advantages of better clinical outcomes and reduced costs. It is essential to consult residents of hospital catchment areas when reorganizing clinical services; a simulation is a useful means of informing these important discussions.
在日本,产科机构的数量一直在稳步减少,产科机构的选择和集中化进程正在迅速推进。产科服务应集中在更少的医院,以提高护理质量并减轻产科医生的工作量。然而,这种服务集中化对进入产科医院的影响尚不清楚。我们进行了一项模拟研究,以根据各种情景考察产科服务的集中化将如何影响就医机会,以及对卫生政策的影响。
使用地理信息系统计算了居住在距产科医院车程30分钟内的15至49岁女性人口,共三种可能的集中化情景:情景1保留分娩量较高的机构,不考虑医疗服务区(MSA,医疗保健行政管理区域)的地理边界;情景2优先在每个MSA保留至少一家医院,然后保留分娩量较高的机构,而情景3使用定位分配模型保留机构以实现最大人口覆盖。我们还评估了仅将服务集中在学术医院和专科围产期医疗中心(PMC)的影响。
2011年,95.0%的15至49岁女性居住在距1075家产科医院之一车程30分钟内。如果将产科服务集中到学术医院以及综合和地区PMC,这一比例将降至82.7%。如果55.0%的机构提供产科服务,情景1中的覆盖率将为87.6%,而基于可及性的集中化在情景2中将实现超过90.5%的覆盖率,在情景3中为93.9%。
产科机构的集中化会损害就医机会,但更大的病例量和更好的人员配备有可能带来更好的临床结果和更低成本的优势。在重组临床服务时,咨询医院服务区域居民至关重要;模拟是为这些重要讨论提供信息的有用手段。