Tenkanen Henrikki, Saarsalmi Perttu, Järv Olle, Salonen Maria, Toivonen Tuuli
Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, Mannerheimintie 166 A, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Int J Health Geogr. 2016 Jul 28;15(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12942-016-0052-x.
In this paper, we demonstrate why and how both temporality and multimodality should be integrated in health related studies that include accessibility perspective, in this case healthy food accessibility. We provide evidence regarding the importance of using multimodal spatio-temporal accessibility measures when conducting research in urban contexts and propose a methodological approach for integrating different travel modes and temporality to spatial accessibility analyses. We use the Helsinki metropolitan area (Finland) as our case study region to demonstrate the effects of temporality and modality on the results.
Spatial analyses were carried out on 250 m statistical grid squares. We measured travel times between the home location of inhabitants and open grocery stores providing healthy food at 5 p.m., 10 p.m., and 1 a.m. using public transportation and private cars. We applied the so-called door-to-door approach for the travel time measurements to obtain more realistic and comparable results between travel modes. The analyses are based on open access data and publicly available open-source tools, thus similar analyses can be conducted in urban regions worldwide.
Our results show that both time and mode of transport have a prominent impact on the outcome of the analyses; thus, understanding the realities of accessibility in a city may be very different according to the setting of the analysis used. In terms of travel time, there is clear variation in the results at different times of the day. In terms of travel mode, our results show that when analyzed in a comparable manner, public transport can be an even faster mode than a private car to access healthy food, especially in central areas of the city where the service network is dense and public transportation system is effective.
This study demonstrates that time and transport modes are essential components when modeling health-related accessibility in urban environments. Neglecting them from spatial analyses may lead to overly simplified or even erroneous images of the realities of accessibility. Hence, there is a risk that health related planning and decisions based on simplistic accessibility measures might cause unwanted outcomes in terms of inequality among different groups of people.
在本文中,我们阐述了为何以及如何将时间性和多模态纳入包含可达性视角的健康相关研究中,在此案例中即健康食品可达性。我们提供了证据,证明在城市环境中开展研究时使用多模态时空可达性测量的重要性,并提出了一种将不同出行方式和时间性整合到空间可达性分析中的方法。我们以芬兰赫尔辛基大都市区为案例研究区域,展示时间性和出行方式对结果的影响。
在250米的统计网格方块上进行空间分析。我们测量了居民住所与在下午5点、晚上10点和凌晨1点提供健康食品的开放式杂货店之间使用公共交通和私家车的出行时间。我们采用所谓的门到门方法进行出行时间测量,以获得不同出行方式之间更现实且可比的结果。这些分析基于开放获取数据和公开可用的开源工具,因此世界各地的城市地区都可以进行类似分析。
我们的结果表明,时间和交通方式对分析结果都有显著影响;因此,根据所使用分析的设定,对城市可达性现实的理解可能会有很大差异。在出行时间方面,一天中不同时间的结果存在明显差异。在出行方式方面,我们的结果表明,以可比方式进行分析时,公共交通可能是比私家车更快获取健康食品的方式,尤其是在城市中心区域,那里服务网络密集且公共交通系统高效。
本研究表明,时间和交通方式是城市环境中与健康相关可达性建模的重要组成部分。在空间分析中忽略它们可能会导致对可达性现实的过度简化甚至错误认知。因此,基于简单可达性措施进行与健康相关的规划和决策可能会在不同人群之间的不平等方面产生不良后果。