• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于检测整群随机试验中基线失衡的倾向得分:c统计量的作用

Propensity score to detect baseline imbalance in cluster randomized trials: the role of the c-statistic.

作者信息

Leyrat Clémence, Caille Agnès, Foucher Yohann, Giraudeau Bruno

机构信息

INSERM U1153, Paris, France.

INSERM CIC 1415, Tours, France.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Jan 22;16:9. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0100-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-015-0100-4
PMID:26801083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4724161/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite randomization, baseline imbalance and confounding bias may occur in cluster randomized trials (CRTs). Covariate imbalance may jeopardize the validity of statistical inferences if they occur on prognostic factors. Thus, the diagnosis of a such imbalance is essential to adjust statistical analysis if required.

METHODS

We developed a tool based on the c-statistic of the propensity score (PS) model to detect global baseline covariate imbalance in CRTs and assess the risk of confounding bias. We performed a simulation study to assess the performance of the proposed tool and applied this method to analyze the data from 2 published CRTs.

RESULTS

The proposed method had good performance for large sample sizes (n =500 per arm) and when the number of unbalanced covariates was not too small as compared with the total number of baseline covariates (≥40% of unbalanced covariates). We also provide a strategy for pre selection of the covariates needed to be included in the PS model to enhance imbalance detection.

CONCLUSION

The proposed tool could be useful in deciding whether covariate adjustment is required before performing statistical analyses of CRTs.

摘要

背景

尽管进行了随机分组,但整群随机试验(CRT)中仍可能出现基线不平衡和混杂偏倚。如果协变量不平衡出现在预后因素上,可能会危及统计推断的有效性。因此,诊断这种不平衡对于在需要时调整统计分析至关重要。

方法

我们开发了一种基于倾向得分(PS)模型的c统计量的工具,以检测CRT中的全局基线协变量不平衡,并评估混杂偏倚的风险。我们进行了一项模拟研究,以评估所提出工具的性能,并应用该方法分析了来自2项已发表的CRT的数据。

结果

对于大样本量(每组n = 500)以及与基线协变量总数相比不平衡协变量数量不太小时(≥40%的不平衡协变量),所提出的方法具有良好的性能。我们还提供了一种策略,用于预先选择PS模型中需要纳入的协变量,以增强不平衡检测。

结论

所提出的工具在决定是否需要在对CRT进行统计分析之前进行协变量调整方面可能会有所帮助。

相似文献

1
Propensity score to detect baseline imbalance in cluster randomized trials: the role of the c-statistic.用于检测整群随机试验中基线失衡的倾向得分:c统计量的作用
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Jan 22;16:9. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0100-4.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Covariate-constrained randomization in cluster randomized 2 × 2 factorial trials: application to a diabetes prevention study.在两因素析因临床试验的整群随机分组中实施协变量受限随机化:一项糖尿病预防研究的应用。
Trials. 2024 Sep 6;25(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08415-z.
4
Propensity score methods for estimating relative risks in cluster randomized trials with low-incidence binary outcomes and selection bias.用于估计具有低发生率二元结局和选择偏倚的整群随机试验中相对风险的倾向评分方法。
Stat Med. 2014 Sep 10;33(20):3556-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.6185. Epub 2014 Apr 27.
5
A review of the use of covariates in cluster randomized trials uncovers marked discrepancies between guidance and practice.对整群随机试验中协变量使用情况的回顾揭示了指南与实践之间的显著差异。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;68(6):603-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.006. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
6
Propensity scores used for analysis of cluster randomized trials with selection bias: a simulation study.倾向评分用于分析存在选择偏倚的整群随机试验:一项模拟研究。
Stat Med. 2013 Aug 30;32(19):3357-72. doi: 10.1002/sim.5795. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
7
Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials Using Covariate Constrained Randomization: A Method for Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs).使用协变量约束随机化的实用整群随机试验:一种基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)的方法。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):663-72. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150001.
8
How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level.整群随机试验中协变量失衡的后果有多大:一项针对连续结局和整群水平二元协变量的模拟研究
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Jul 11;16:79. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0182-7.
9
An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.在具有连续结局的横断面、阶梯式整群随机试验中,整群大小的不平衡不会导致显著的效能损失。
Trials. 2017 Mar 7;18(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1832-8.
10
Covariate-constrained randomization in cluster randomized 2x2 factorial trials: Application to a diabetes prevention study.整群随机2×2析因试验中的协变量受限随机化:在一项糖尿病预防研究中的应用
Res Sq. 2024 Mar 25:rs.3.rs-3783684. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3783684/v1.

引用本文的文献

1
Increasing COVID-19 testing and vaccination among Spanish speakers in the USA: protocol for the development and evaluation of the intervention using a group-randomised trial design.提高美国西班牙语使用者的 COVID-19 检测和疫苗接种率:使用群组随机试验设计开发和评估干预措施的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 16;12(11):e066585. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066585.
2
Testing Function Focused Care for Acute Care using the Evidence Integration Triangle: Protocol description.使用证据整合三角测试急性护理中的功能聚焦护理:方案描述。
Res Nurs Health. 2022 Jun;45(3):300-313. doi: 10.1002/nur.22223. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
3
Efficacy and durability of multifactorial intervention on mortality and MACEs: a randomized clinical trial in type-2 diabetic kidney disease.

本文引用的文献

1
A review of the use of covariates in cluster randomized trials uncovers marked discrepancies between guidance and practice.对整群随机试验中协变量使用情况的回顾揭示了指南与实践之间的显著差异。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;68(6):603-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.006. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
2
Propensity score methods for estimating relative risks in cluster randomized trials with low-incidence binary outcomes and selection bias.用于估计具有低发生率二元结局和选择偏倚的整群随机试验中相对风险的倾向评分方法。
Stat Med. 2014 Sep 10;33(20):3556-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.6185. Epub 2014 Apr 27.
3
Intraclass correlation coefficients for cluster randomized trials in care pathways and usual care: hospital treatment for heart failure.
多因素干预对 2 型糖尿病肾病患者死亡率和主要不良心血管事件的疗效和持久性:一项随机临床试验。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Jul 16;20(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01343-1.
4
Interim data monitoring in cluster randomised trials: Practical issues and a case study.群组随机对照试验中的中期数据监测:实际问题及案例研究。
Clin Trials. 2021 Oct;18(5):552-561. doi: 10.1177/17407745211024751. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
5
A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Impact of Function and Behavior Focused Care for Nursing Home Residents With Dementia.一项针对养老院痴呆患者的以功能和行为为重点的护理的影响的整群随机对照试验
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Jul;22(7):1421-1428.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.12.020. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
6
Imbalance values for baseline covariates in randomized controlled trials: a last resort for the use of values? A pro and contra debate.随机对照试验中基线协变量的失衡值:使用这些值的最后手段?正反观点辩论。
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 May 8;10:531-535. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S161508. eCollection 2018.
7
Applying quantitative bias analysis to estimate the plausible effects of selection bias in a cluster randomised controlled trial: secondary analysis of the Primary care Osteoarthritis Screening Trial (POST).应用定量偏倚分析估计整群随机对照试验中选择偏倚的可能影响:初级保健骨关节炎筛查试验(POST)的二次分析
Trials. 2017 Dec 4;18(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2329-1.
8
Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 2-Analysis.群组随机试验近期方法学进展综述:第2部分——分析
Am J Public Health. 2017 Jul;107(7):1078-1086. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303707. Epub 2017 May 18.
9
The effect of a clinical decision-making mHealth support system on maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity in Ghana: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.临床决策移动健康支持系统对加纳孕产妇和新生儿死亡率及发病率的影响:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1897-4.
10
How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level.整群随机试验中协变量失衡的后果有多大:一项针对连续结局和整群水平二元协变量的模拟研究
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Jul 11;16:79. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0182-7.
护理路径和常规护理中整群随机试验的组内相关系数:心力衰竭的医院治疗
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 24;14:84. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-84.
4
Propensity score balance measures in pharmacoepidemiology: a simulation study.药物流行病学中的倾向评分平衡测量:一项模拟研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014 Aug;23(8):802-11. doi: 10.1002/pds.3574. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
5
Metrics for covariate balance in cohort studies of causal effects.协变量平衡的度量在因果效应的队列研究中。
Stat Med. 2014 May 10;33(10):1685-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.6058. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
6
The z-difference can be used to measure covariate balance in matched propensity score analyses.Z 差值可用于衡量匹配倾向评分分析中的协变量平衡。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Nov;66(11):1302-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
7
Propensity scores used for analysis of cluster randomized trials with selection bias: a simulation study.倾向评分用于分析存在选择偏倚的整群随机试验:一项模拟研究。
Stat Med. 2013 Aug 30;32(19):3357-72. doi: 10.1002/sim.5795. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
8
Seven myths of randomisation in clinical trials.临床试验中随机化的七大误区。
Stat Med. 2013 Apr 30;32(9):1439-50. doi: 10.1002/sim.5713. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
9
Allocation techniques for balance at baseline in cluster randomized trials: a methodological review.在整群随机试验中,对基线平衡的分配技术:方法学综述。
Trials. 2012 Aug 1;13:120. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-120.
10
Methods for covariate adjustment in cost-effectiveness analysis that use cluster randomised trials.在成本效益分析中使用整群随机试验进行协变量调整的方法。
Health Econ. 2012 Sep;21(9):1101-18. doi: 10.1002/hec.2812. Epub 2012 Mar 28.