Choo Pei Ling, Gallagher Helen L, Morris Jacqui, Pomeroy Valerie M, van Wijck Frederike
School of Health and Life Sciences Glasgow Caledonian University Glasgow UK.
Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit Glasgow Caledonian University Glasgow UK.
Brain Behav. 2015 Nov 26;5(12):e00411. doi: 10.1002/brb3.411. eCollection 2015 Dec.
Bilateral training (BT) of the upper limb (UL) might enhance recovery of arm function after stroke. To better understand the therapeutic potential of BT, this study aimed to determine the correlation between arm motor behavior and brain structure/function as a result of bilateral arm training poststroke.
A systematic review of quantitative studies of BT evaluating both UL motor behavior and neuroplasticity was conducted. Eleven electronic databases were searched. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed methodological quality, using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool.
Eight studies comprising 164 participants met the inclusion criteria. Only two studies rated "strong" on the EPHPP tool. Considerable heterogeneity of participants, BT modes, comparator interventions and measures contraindicated pooled outcome analysis. Modes of BT included: in-phase and anti-phase; functional movements involving objects; and movements only. Movements were mechanically coupled, free, auditory-cued, or self-paced. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UL section) was used in six of eight studies, however, different subsections were used by different studies. Neural correlates were measured using fMRI and TMS in three and five studies, respectively, using a wide variety of variables. Associations between changes in UL function and neural plasticity were inconsistent and only two studies reported a statistical correlation following BT.
No clear pattern of association between UL motor and neural response to BT was apparent from this review, indicating that the neural correlates of motor behavior response to BT after stroke remain unknown. To understand the full therapeutic potential of BT and its different modes, further investigation is required.
上肢双侧训练(BT)可能会促进中风后手臂功能的恢复。为了更好地理解BT的治疗潜力,本研究旨在确定中风后双侧手臂训练导致的手臂运动行为与脑结构/功能之间的相关性。
对评估上肢运动行为和神经可塑性的BT定量研究进行系统综述。检索了11个电子数据库。两名评价者使用有效公共卫生实践项目(EPHPP)工具独立选择研究、提取数据并评估方法学质量。
八项研究共164名参与者符合纳入标准。只有两项研究在EPHPP工具上被评为“强”。参与者、BT模式、对照干预措施和测量方法存在相当大的异质性,因此不适合进行汇总结果分析。BT模式包括:同相和反相;涉及物体的功能性运动;以及仅运动。运动方式有机械耦合、自由、听觉提示或自定节奏。八项研究中有六项使用了Fugl-Meyer评估(上肢部分),但不同研究使用了不同的子部分。分别有三项和五项研究使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和经颅磁刺激(TMS)测量神经相关性,使用了各种各样的变量。上肢功能变化与神经可塑性之间的关联并不一致,只有两项研究报告了BT后的统计学相关性。
从本综述中未发现上肢运动与对BT的神经反应之间存在明显的关联模式,这表明中风后对BT的运动行为反应的神经相关性仍然未知。为了了解BT及其不同模式的全部治疗潜力,需要进一步研究。