Wood Fiona M, Phillips Michael, Jovic Tom, Cassidy John T, Cameron Peter, Edgar Dale W
Burn Service of Western Australia, State Adult Burn Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Burn Injury Research Unit, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147259. eCollection 2016.
Reported first aid application, frequency and practices around the world vary greatly. Based primarily on animal and observational studies, first aid after a burn injury is considered to be integral in reducing scar and infection, and the need for surgery. The current recommendation for optimum first aid after burn is water cooling for 20 minutes within three hours. However, compliance with this guideline is reported as poor to moderate at best and evidence exists to suggest that overcooling can be detrimental. This prospective cohort study of a bi-national burn patient registry examined data collected between 2009 and 2012. The aim of the study was to quantify the magnitude of effects of water cooling first aid after burn on indicators of burn severity in a large human cohort.
The data for the analysis was provided by the Burn Registry of Australia and New Zealand (BRANZ). The application of first aid cooling prior to admission to a dedicated burn service, was analysed for its influence on four outcomes related to injury severity. The patient related outcomes were whether graft surgery occurred, and death while the health system (cost) outcomes included total hospital length of stay and admission to ICU. Robust regression analysis using bootstrapped estimation adjusted using a propensity score was used to control for confounding and to estimate the strength of association with first aid. Dose-response relationships were examined to determine associations with duration of first aid. The influence of covariates on the impact of first aid was assessed.
Cooling was provided before Burn Centre admission for 68% of patients, with at least twenty minutes duration for 46%. The results indicated a reduction in burn injury severity associated with first aid. Patients probability for graft surgery fell by 0.070 from 0.537 (13% reduction) (p = 0.014). The probability for ICU admission fell by 0.084 from 0.175 (48% reduction) (p<0.001) and hospital length of stay (LOS) fell by 2.27 days from 12.9 days (18% reduction) (p = 0.001). All outcomes except death showed a dose-response relationship with the duration of first aid. The size of burn and age interacted with many of the relationships between first aid and outcome and these are described and discussed.
DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION: This study suggests that there are significant patient and health system benefits from cooling water first aid, particularly if applied for up to 20 minutes. The results of this study estimate the effect size of post-burn first aid and confirm that efforts to promote first aid knowledge are not only warranted, but provide potential cost savings.
世界各地报告的急救应用、频率和做法差异很大。主要基于动物和观察性研究,烧伤后的急救被认为对减少疤痕和感染以及手术需求至关重要。目前关于烧伤后最佳急救的建议是在三小时内用水冷却20分钟。然而,据报道,对该指南的遵守情况充其量只能说是差到中等,并且有证据表明过度冷却可能有害。这项对两国烧伤患者登记处进行的前瞻性队列研究检查了2009年至2012年期间收集的数据。该研究的目的是量化烧伤后用水冷却急救对一大群人烧伤严重程度指标的影响程度。
分析的数据由澳大利亚和新西兰烧伤登记处(BRANZ)提供。分析了在进入专门的烧伤服务机构之前进行急救冷却的情况对与损伤严重程度相关的四个结果的影响。与患者相关的结果是是否进行了植皮手术以及死亡情况,而卫生系统(成本)结果包括总住院时间和入住重症监护病房情况。使用倾向得分调整后的自抽样估计进行稳健回归分析,以控制混杂因素并估计与急救的关联强度。检查剂量反应关系以确定与急救持续时间的关联。评估了协变量对急救影响的作用。
68%的患者在进入烧伤中心之前接受了冷却,其中46%的患者冷却时间至少为20分钟。结果表明急救与烧伤损伤严重程度降低相关。接受植皮手术的患者概率从0.537下降了0.070(降低了13%)(p = 0.014)。入住重症监护病房的概率从0.175下降了0.084(降低了48%)(p<0.001),住院时间从12.9天下降了2.27天(降低了18%)(p = 0.001)。除死亡外的所有结果都与急救持续时间呈剂量反应关系。烧伤面积和年龄与急救和结果之间的许多关系相互作用,对此进行了描述和讨论。
本研究表明,用水冷却急救对患者和卫生系统有显著益处,特别是如果应用长达20分钟。本研究结果估计了烧伤后急救的效应大小,并证实推广急救知识的努力不仅是必要的,而且有可能节省成本。