• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低收入和中等收入国家临床试验的利益相关者观点:一项系统综述

Stakeholder Views of Clinical Trials in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Joseph Pathma D, Caldwell Patrina H Y, Tong Allison, Hanson Camilla S, Craig Jonathan C

机构信息

Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia; Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, and The Pharmacy Department, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia

Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia; Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, and.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20152800. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2800. Epub 2016 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2015-2800
PMID:26812926
Abstract

CONTEXT

Clinical trials are necessary to improve the health care of children, but only one-quarter are conducted in the low- to middle-income countries (LMICs) in which 98% of the global burden of disease resides.

OBJECTIVE

To describe stakeholder beliefs and experiences of conducting trials in children in LMICs.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases were searched to August 2014.

STUDY SELECTION

Qualitative studies of stakeholder perspectives on conducting clinical trials among children in LMICs.

DATA EXTRACTION

Findingswere analyzed by using thematic synthesis.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies involving 3110 participants (children [n = 290], parents or caregivers [n = 1609], community representatives [n = 621], clinical or research team members [n = 376], regulators [n = 18], or sponsors [n = 15]) across 22 countries were included. Five themes were identified: centrality of community engagement (mobilizing community, representatives' pivotal role, managing expectations, and retaining involvement); cognizance of vulnerability and poverty (therapeutic opportunity and medical mistrust); contending with power differentials (exploitation, stigmatization, and disempowerment); translating research to local context (cultural beliefs, impoverishment constraints, and ethical pluralism); and advocating fair distribution of benefits (health care, sponsor obligation, and collateral community benefits).

LIMITATIONS

Studies not published in English were excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

Conducting trials in children in LMICs is complex due to social disadvantage, economic scarcity, idiosyncratic cultural beliefs, and historical disempowerment, all of which contribute to inequity, mistrust, and fears of exploitation. Effective community engagement in recruiting, building research capacities, and designing trials that are pragmatic, ethical, and relevant to the health care needs of children in LMICs may help to improve the equity and health outcomes of this vulnerable population.

摘要

背景

临床试验对于改善儿童医疗保健状况很有必要,但仅有四分之一的试验在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)开展,而全球98%的疾病负担都集中在这些国家。

目的

描述利益相关者对在低收入和中等收入国家开展儿童试验的看法和经历。

数据来源

检索电子数据库至2014年8月。

研究选择

关于利益相关者对在低收入和中等收入国家儿童中开展临床试验的观点的定性研究。

数据提取

采用主题综合法分析研究结果。

结果

纳入了来自22个国家的39项研究,涉及3110名参与者(儿童[n = 290]、父母或照料者[n = 1609]、社区代表[n = 621]、临床或研究团队成员[n = 376]、监管者[n = 18]或赞助商[n = 15])。确定了五个主题:社区参与的核心地位(动员社区、代表的关键作用、管理期望以及保持参与);认识到脆弱性和贫困(治疗机会和医疗不信任);应对权力差异(剥削、污名化和丧失权力);将研究转化为当地情况(文化信仰、贫困限制和伦理多元主义);倡导公平分配利益(医疗保健、赞助商义务和附带的社区利益)。

局限性

未发表英文版本的研究被排除。

结论

由于社会劣势、经济匮乏、独特的文化信仰以及历史上的无权状况,在低收入和中等收入国家开展儿童试验很复杂,所有这些因素都导致了不公平、不信任以及对剥削的恐惧。有效的社区参与招募、建设研究能力以及设计切实可行、符合伦理且与低收入和中等收入国家儿童医疗保健需求相关的试验,可能有助于改善这一弱势群体的公平性和健康结果。

相似文献

1
Stakeholder Views of Clinical Trials in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.低收入和中等收入国家临床试验的利益相关者观点:一项系统综述
Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20152800. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2800. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
2
Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.用于减少贫困和脆弱性的无条件现金转移:对低收入和中等收入国家卫生服务利用及健康结果的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 15;11(11):CD011135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011135.pub2.
3
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
4
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
5
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
6
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Financial arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.低收入国家卫生系统的财务安排:系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 11;9(9):CD011084. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011084.pub2.
9
Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.无条件现金转移以减少贫困和脆弱性:对中低收入国家卫生服务利用和健康结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD011135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011135.pub3.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies to build trust in the conduct of clinical trials: Stakeholders' views in a qualitative study in Ghana.在临床试验开展过程中建立信任的策略:加纳一项定性研究中利益相关者的观点
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 8;5(4):e0003201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003201. eCollection 2025.
2
The Holy Grail: highlighting the need for equitable access to dementia treatments and clinical trials.圣杯:凸显公平获得痴呆症治疗和临床试验的必要性。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Feb 8;55:101492. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101492. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Shared challenges to the control of complex intracellular neglected pathogens.
复杂细胞内被忽视病原体控制面临的共同挑战。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 11;12:1423420. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1423420. eCollection 2024.
4
Conducting Drug Treatment Trials in Children: Opportunities and Challenges.儿童药物治疗试验:机遇与挑战。
Pharmaceut Med. 2024 May;38(3):179-204. doi: 10.1007/s40290-024-00523-0. Epub 2024 May 10.
5
Catalysing global surgery: a meta-research study on factors affecting surgical research collaborations with Africa.催化全球外科手术发展:影响与非洲开展外科研究合作的因素的元研究
Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 18;13(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02474-8.
6
Clinical trials landscape in a lower-middle-income country (Pakistan).低收入中等收入国家(巴基斯坦)的临床试验概况
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Dec 10;8(1):e7. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.701. eCollection 2024.
7
Affordable cancer technologies: Lessons learned from the design and implementation of two randomized clinical trials to develop innovative treatments for cervical precancer.可负担的癌症技术:从两项随机临床试验的设计与实施中汲取的经验教训,以开发宫颈癌前病变的创新治疗方法。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Oct 30;36:101224. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101224. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Research Bronchoscopies in Critically Ill Research Participants: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.研究危重研究参与者的支气管镜检查:美国胸科学会官方研讨会报告。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 May;20(5):621-631. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202302-106ST.
9
Are We Scared of Clinical Trials if Not Sufficiently Informed and Educated?如果没有足够的信息和教育,我们会害怕临床试验吗?
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Oct 27;13:1359-1366. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S375904. eCollection 2022.
10
Patient-centred clinical trial design.以患者为中心的临床试验设计。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022 Aug;18(8):514-523. doi: 10.1038/s41581-022-00585-w. Epub 2022 Jun 6.