• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用ASCOT定制版对当地一家医院的创伤护理质量进行评估。

Evaluation of Quality of Trauma Care in a Local Hospital Using a Customization of ASCOT.

作者信息

Moini Majid, Rezaishiraz Hamed, Zarineh Alireza, Rasouli Mohammad R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Sina Hospital Medical Sciences/Tehran University, Hassan-abad Square, 1136933511, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Surgery, Sina Hospital, Medical Sciences/Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009 Feb;35(1):56-60. doi: 10.1007/s00068-008-7044-x. Epub 2008 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00068-008-7044-x
PMID:26814533
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluating processes of care and outcomes of injured patients are important if improvements in the quality of care delivered to injured patients are to be accomplished. We applied a customized ASCOT model developed from our database as a tool to criticize the quality of care in a local hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total number of 4,096 trauma patients were used to develop new coefficients for customization of ASCOT. These patients were divided randomly into two equal groups. New coefficients for ASCOT were derived from the first set of patients. The newly developed model was validated in the second group of patients and the measures of discrimination (area under the ROC curve) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit) were calculated. Then we used the customized model to calculate the W score in different subgroups of patients treated in a local hospital to evaluate the care offered to patients in each group.

RESULTS

The customized ASCOT had a good discrimination (area under ROC curve = 0.9575) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit p value = 0.7628) in the validation dataset. Using the customized model, we calculated W score in different subgroup of patients treated in a local hospital for a period of six months. The quality of care was worst for laparotomy (W = -13.31) and pelvic fracture (W = -5.56) and best for orthopedic (W = 1.76) operations.

CONCLUSION

We believe that a customization of ASCOT model when used for evaluation of quality of care in a local hospital can be useful for detection of defects and improvement of the process of care delivered to the patients.

摘要

目的

若要实现提高为受伤患者提供的护理质量这一目标,评估护理流程及受伤患者的治疗结果至关重要。我们应用了基于我们的数据库开发的定制化ASCOT模型,作为评判一家当地医院护理质量的工具。

患者与方法

总共4096例创伤患者被用于制定ASCOT定制化的新系数。这些患者被随机分为两组。ASCOT的新系数源自第一组患者。新开发的模型在第二组患者中进行验证,并计算辨别力指标(ROC曲线下面积)和校准指标(Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度)。然后我们使用定制模型计算当地医院不同亚组患者的W评分,以评估每组患者所接受的护理。

结果

定制化ASCOT在验证数据集中具有良好的辨别力(ROC曲线下面积 = 0.9575)和校准(Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度p值 = 0.7628)。使用定制模型,我们计算了当地医院六个月期间不同亚组患者的W评分。剖腹手术(W = -13.31)和骨盆骨折(W = -5.56)的护理质量最差,骨科手术(W = 1.76)的护理质量最佳。

结论

我们认为,ASCOT模型用于评估当地医院护理质量时进行定制化,有助于发现缺陷并改善为患者提供的护理流程。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Quality of Trauma Care in a Local Hospital Using a Customization of ASCOT.使用ASCOT定制版对当地一家医院的创伤护理质量进行评估。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009 Feb;35(1):56-60. doi: 10.1007/s00068-008-7044-x. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
2
Validation of a base deficit-based trauma prediction model and comparison with TRISS and ASCOT.基于碱缺失的创伤预测模型的验证及与TRISS和ASCOT的比较。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016 Oct;42(5):627-633. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0592-y. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
3
Development and validation of the revised injury severity classification score for severely injured patients.严重受伤患者修订版损伤严重程度分类评分的开发与验证
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009 Oct;35(5):437-47. doi: 10.1007/s00068-009-9122-0. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
4
Evaluating trauma center quality: does the choice of the severity-adjustment model make a difference?
J Trauma. 2005 Jun;58(6):1265-71. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000169429.58786.c6.
5
The Pediatric Risk of Hospital Admission score: a second-generation severity-of-illness score for pediatric emergency patients.儿童住院风险评分:一种用于儿科急诊患者的第二代疾病严重程度评分。
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):388-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0586.
6
Assessment of six mortality prediction models in patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock to the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study.对入住重症监护病房的严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的六种死亡率预测模型的评估:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2003 Oct;7(5):R116-22. doi: 10.1186/cc2373. Epub 2003 Aug 28.
7
Discrimination and calibration of mortality risk prediction models in interventional cardiology.介入心脏病学中死亡风险预测模型的辨别与校准
J Biomed Inform. 2005 Oct;38(5):367-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.007. Epub 2005 Mar 26.
8
Validation of SAPS3 admission score and its customization for use in Korean intensive care unit patients: a prospective multicentre study.SAPS3 入院评分的验证及其在韩国重症监护病房患者中的定制应用:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Respirology. 2013 Aug;18(6):989-95. doi: 10.1111/resp.12115.
9
Application of "Trauma and Injury Severity Score" and "A Severity Characterization of Trauma" score to trauma patients in a setting different from "Major Trauma Outcome Study".“创伤与损伤严重度评分”及“创伤严重度特征”评分在与“重大创伤结局研究”不同的环境中对创伤患者的应用
Arch Iran Med. 2007 Jul;10(3):383-6.
10
A comparison of the performance of a model based on administrative data and a model based on clinical data: effect of severity of illness on standardized mortality ratios of intensive care units.基于行政数据的模型与基于临床数据的模型性能比较:疾病严重程度对重症监护病房标准化死亡率的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):373-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232d7b0.

引用本文的文献

1
A new trauma severity scoring system adapted to wearable monitoring: A pilot study.一种适用于可穿戴监测的新型创伤严重程度评分系统:一项试点研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 4;20(3):e0318290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318290. eCollection 2025.
2
Designing and conducting initial application of a performance assessment model for in-hospital trauma care.设计并初步应用医院创伤护理绩效评估模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07578-2.
3
Identifying indicators and evaluation steps with suggestions for improving trauma care in Iran: experts' perspective.

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics and outcome of injured patients treated in urban trauma centers in Iran.伊朗城市创伤中心收治的受伤患者的特征与结局
J Trauma. 2000 Mar;48(3):503-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200003000-00023.
2
[Comparison between of TRISS and ASCOT methods--in Tainan area. Trauma and Injury Severity Score. A Severity Characterization of Trauma].
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 1996 Dec;12(12):691-8.
3
Improved predictions from a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) over Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): results of an independent evaluation.创伤严重程度特征化评分(ASCOT)相较于创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)的预测改进:一项独立评估结果
确定指标和评估步骤并提出改进伊朗创伤护理的建议:专家观点。
J Inj Violence Res. 2021 Jul;13(2):99-110. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v13i2.1589. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
J Trauma. 1996 Jan;40(1):42-8; discussion 48-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199601000-00009.
4
Assessment of injury severity: the triage index.损伤严重程度评估:分诊指数
Crit Care Med. 1980 Apr;8(4):201-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198004000-00001.
5
Preventable trauma deaths. A review of trauma care systems development.可预防的创伤死亡。创伤护理系统发展综述。
JAMA. 1985;254(8):1059-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.254.8.1059.
6
Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score.评估创伤护理:TRISS 方法。创伤评分与损伤严重程度评分。
J Trauma. 1987 Apr;27(4):370-8.
7
Assessment of probability of survival in penetrating injuries using the TRISS methodology.
Injury. 1989 Jan;20(1):10-2. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(89)90035-1.
8
A new characterization of injury severity.损伤严重程度的一种新表征。
J Trauma. 1990 May;30(5):539-45; discussion 545-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199005000-00003.
9
Limitations of the TRISS method for interhospital comparisons: a multihospital study.
J Trauma. 1991 Apr;31(4):471-81; discussion 481-2. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199104000-00005.
10
TRISS analysis of trauma care: a Yugoslav perspective.
Injury. 1992;23(8):511-4. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(92)90147-k.