• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定指标和评估步骤并提出改进伊朗创伤护理的建议:专家观点。

Identifying indicators and evaluation steps with suggestions for improving trauma care in Iran: experts' perspective.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

J Inj Violence Res. 2021 Jul;13(2):99-110. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v13i2.1589. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

DOI:10.5249/jivr.v13i2.1589
PMID:33893732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8435083/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trauma is one of the major causes of mortality across the world. Trauma patients have critical status and need timely, adequate, and organized care. The different consequences of trauma care among service centers around the world and even within a country revealed the need for careful evaluation. This study was designed and executed to collect experts' opinions on the evaluation steps, related indicators, and improvement strategies in trauma care.

METHODS

This qualitative study was based on a conventional content analysis approach. 2 focus group discussions (FGD) with 6 participants per FGD and 16 face-to-face in-depth interviews were conducted to collect the required information (from September 2018 to early 2019). Participants were selected through the purposive sampling method. The experts' viewpoints were classified by the main and sub themes.

RESULTS

Four basic themes extracted from the interviews and focus group discussions including, trauma care importance (sub-themes: the involved individuals' being young and productive and the effectiveness of trauma care); trauma care indicators (sub-themes: pre-hospital indicators, in-hospital indicators, and post-hospital indicators); stages of trauma care evaluation (sub-themes: evaluation prerequisites, finalization of indicators before the evaluation, determining evaluation time scope, determining evaluation dimensions, external and internal evaluation and use of evaluation results); trauma care improvement (sub-themes: balancing workload in trauma centers, enhancement of information system, considering extra-organizational dimensions in trauma care and empowerment of trauma care providers).

CONCLUSIONS

According to experts' viewpoints, trauma is a very important issue, because it involves young people. They believed that having indicators covering all aspects of care assist health managers and policymakers to understand under-standard performance. These indicators should be used in the form of a specific evaluation program and related to Iran context. Besides, reforming macro policies, planning, development of infrastructures, and education was some recommendations of experts to improve trauma care.

摘要

背景

创伤是全球范围内导致死亡的主要原因之一。创伤患者病情危急,需要及时、充分、有组织的护理。世界各地乃至一个国家内不同服务中心的创伤护理结果差异表明,需要对其进行仔细评估。本研究旨在收集专家对创伤护理评估步骤、相关指标和改进策略的意见。

方法

本定性研究基于传统的内容分析法。我们进行了 2 次焦点小组讨论(每组 6 人)和 16 次面对面深入访谈,以收集所需信息(2018 年 9 月至 2019 年初)。参与者通过目的抽样法选择。专家观点按主要和次要主题进行分类。

结果

访谈和焦点小组讨论中提取出 4 个基本主题,包括创伤护理的重要性(涉及个人年轻且富有生产力和创伤护理的有效性);创伤护理指标(包括院前指标、院内指标和院后指标);创伤护理评估阶段(包括评估前提、评估前确定指标、确定评估时间范围、确定评估维度、外部和内部评估以及评估结果的使用);创伤护理改进(包括平衡创伤中心的工作量、加强信息系统、考虑创伤护理的组织外维度以及增强创伤护理提供者的能力)。

结论

根据专家观点,创伤是一个非常重要的问题,因为它涉及年轻人。他们认为,拥有涵盖护理各个方面的指标有助于卫生管理者和政策制定者了解不达标的表现。这些指标应作为特定的评估方案使用,并与伊朗国情相关。此外,专家建议改革宏观政策、规划、基础设施发展和教育,以改善创伤护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae03/8435083/256583dda562/jivr-13-99-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae03/8435083/256583dda562/jivr-13-99-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae03/8435083/256583dda562/jivr-13-99-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying indicators and evaluation steps with suggestions for improving trauma care in Iran: experts' perspective.确定指标和评估步骤并提出改进伊朗创伤护理的建议:专家观点。
J Inj Violence Res. 2021 Jul;13(2):99-110. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v13i2.1589. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
2
Preparedness of non-hospital health centers to manage patients with life-threatening emergency conditions: findings from a qualitative study.非医院健康中心应对危及生命紧急情况患者的准备情况:一项定性研究的结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):1129. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05981-1.
3
Factors affecting hospital services overutilization and reductive strategies in Iran: a qualitative study to explore experts' views.影响伊朗医院服务过度利用的因素及减少策略:一项旨在探讨专家观点的定性研究。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2022 Dec;50(5):416-424. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2022.2134679. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
4
Performance evaluation of Al-Zahra academic medical center based on Iran balanced scorecard model.基于伊朗平衡计分卡模型对阿尔-扎赫拉学术医学中心的绩效评估
J Educ Health Promot. 2012;1:1. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.94408. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
5
Implementation Requirements for Patient Discharge Planning in Health System: A qualitative study in Iran.卫生系统中患者出院计划的实施要求:伊朗的一项定性研究
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018 Mar;28(2):157-168. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v28i2.7.
6
The challenges of physicians' participation in hospital accreditation programs: a qualitative study in Iran.医生参与医院认证计划的挑战:伊朗的一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 28;21(1):1171. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07182-w.
7
Designing and conducting initial application of a performance assessment model for in-hospital trauma care.设计并初步应用医院创伤护理绩效评估模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07578-2.
8
A framework for elderly participation in Primary Health Care in Tabriz Health complexes.塔比里斯医疗综合体中老年人参与初级卫生保健的框架。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Aug 21;23(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04217-1.
9
Considerations about the implementation of an autism screening program in Iran from the viewpoints of professionals and parents: a qualitative study.关于在伊朗实施自闭症筛查计划的考虑因素:专业人士和家长的观点——一项定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 23;21(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03061-0.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

1
TERMINAL-24 Score in Predicting Early and In-hospital Mortality of Trauma Patients; a Cross-sectional.TERMINAL-24评分对创伤患者早期及院内死亡率的预测价值;一项横断面研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 12;13(1):e25. doi: 10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2526. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term outcomes in major trauma patients and correlations with the acute phase.重大创伤患者的长期预后及其与急性期的相关性。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Jan 13;15:6. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-0289-3. eCollection 2020.
2
Barriers to and Facilitators of Road Traffic Injuries Prevention in Iran; A Qualitative Study.伊朗道路交通伤害预防的障碍与促进因素;一项定性研究。
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2019 Oct;7(4):390-398. doi: 10.29252/beat-070408.
3
Priorities for trauma quality improvement and registry use in Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰创伤质量改进和登记册使用的优先事项。
Injury. 2020 Jan;51(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.09.033. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
4
Predictors of Delayed Emergency Department Throughput Among Blunt Trauma Patients.钝器创伤患者中延迟急诊部门吞吐量的预测因素。
J Surg Res. 2020 Jan;245:81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.028. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
5
Establishing a Regional Trauma Preventable/Potentially Preventable Death Rate.建立区域性创伤可预防/潜在可预防死亡率。
Ann Surg. 2020 Feb;271(2):375-382. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002999.
6
Effectiveness of trauma team on medical resource utilization and quality of care for patients with major trauma.创伤团队对严重创伤患者医疗资源利用及医疗质量的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 24;17(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2429-3.
7
Implementation of the World Health Organization Trauma Care Checklist Program in 11 Centers Across Multiple Economic Strata: Effect on Care Process Measures.在多个经济阶层的11个中心实施世界卫生组织创伤护理检查表项目:对护理过程指标的影响
World J Surg. 2017 Apr;41(4):954-962. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3759-8.
8
Evaluation of Quality of Trauma Care in a Local Hospital Using a Customization of ASCOT.使用ASCOT定制版对当地一家医院的创伤护理质量进行评估。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009 Feb;35(1):56-60. doi: 10.1007/s00068-008-7044-x. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
9
Psychometric properties of the world health organization disability assessment schedule II -12 Item (WHODAS II) in trauma patients.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版-12项(WHODAS II)在创伤患者中的心理测量特性。
Injury. 2016 May;47(5):1104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.046. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
10
District-level hospital trauma care audit filters: Delphi technique for defining context-appropriate indicators for quality improvement initiative evaluation in developing countries.区级医院创伤护理审计筛选标准:用于为发展中国家质量改进计划评估定义适合当地情况指标的德尔菲法。
Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):211-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 28.