Ilinykh Philipp A, Shen Xiaoli, Flyak Andrew I, Kuzmina Natalia, Ksiazek Thomas G, Crowe James E, Bukreyev Alexander
Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Galveston National Laboratory, Galveston, Texas, USA.
J Virol. 2016 Mar 28;90(8):3890-3901. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00101-16. Print 2016 Apr.
Recent experiments suggest that some glycoprotein (GP)-specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) can protect experimental animals against the filovirus Ebola virus (EBOV). There is a need for isolation of MAbs capable of neutralizing multiple filoviruses. Antibody neutralization assays for filoviruses frequently use surrogate systems such as the rhabdovirus vesicular stomatitis Indiana virus (VSV), lentiviruses or gammaretroviruses with their envelope proteins replaced with EBOV GP or pseudotyped with EBOV GP. It is optimal for both screening and in-depth characterization of newly identified neutralizing MAbs to generate recombinant filoviruses that express a reporter fluorescent protein in order to more easily monitor and quantify the infection. Our study showed that unlike neutralization-sensitive chimeric VSV, authentic filoviruses are highly resistant to neutralization by MAbs. We used reverse genetics techniques to replace EBOV GP with its counterpart from the heterologous filoviruses Bundibugyo virus (BDBV), Sudan virus, and even Marburg virus and Lloviu virus, which belong to the heterologous genera in the filovirus family. This work resulted in generation of multiple chimeric filoviruses, demonstrating the ability of filoviruses to tolerate swapping of the envelope protein. The sensitivity of chimeric filoviruses to neutralizing MAbs was similar to that of authentic biologically derived filoviruses with the same GP. Moreover, disabling the expression of the secreted GP (sGP) resulted in an increased susceptibility of an engineered virus to the BDBV52 MAb isolated from a BDBV survivor, suggesting a role for sGP in evasion of antibody neutralization in the context of a human filovirus infection.
The study demonstrated that chimeric rhabdoviruses in which G protein is replaced with filovirus GP, widely used as surrogate targets for characterization of filovirus neutralizing antibodies, do not accurately predict the ability of antibodies to neutralize authentic filoviruses, which appeared to be resistant to neutralization. However, a recombinant EBOV expressing a fluorescent protein tolerated swapping of GP with counterparts from heterologous filoviruses, allowing high-throughput screening of B cell lines to isolate MAbs of any filovirus specificity. Human MAb BDBV52, which was isolated from a survivor of BDBV infection, was capable of partially neutralizing a chimeric EBOV carrying BDBV GP in which expression of sGP was disabled. In contrast, the parental virus expressing sGP was resistant to the MAb. Thus, the ability of filoviruses to tolerate swapping of GP can be used for identification of neutralizing MAbs specific to any filovirus and for the characterization of MAb specificity and mechanism of action.
最近的实验表明,一些糖蛋白(GP)特异性单克隆抗体(MAb)可以保护实验动物免受丝状病毒埃博拉病毒(EBOV)感染。需要分离能够中和多种丝状病毒的单克隆抗体。丝状病毒的抗体中和试验经常使用替代系统,如弹状病毒水疱性口炎印第安纳病毒(VSV)、慢病毒或γ逆转录病毒,其包膜蛋白被EBOV GP取代或用EBOV GP假型化。为了更轻松地监测和量化感染,生成表达报告荧光蛋白的重组丝状病毒对于新鉴定的中和单克隆抗体的筛选和深入表征都是最佳选择。我们的研究表明,与对中和敏感的嵌合VSV不同,正宗的丝状病毒对单克隆抗体的中和具有高度抗性。我们使用反向遗传学技术,用来自异源丝状病毒本迪布焦病毒(BDBV)、苏丹病毒,甚至属于丝状病毒科异源属的马尔堡病毒和洛维乌病毒的对应物替换EBOV GP。这项工作产生了多种嵌合丝状病毒,证明了丝状病毒能够耐受包膜蛋白的交换。嵌合丝状病毒对中和单克隆抗体的敏感性与具有相同GP的正宗生物学来源的丝状病毒相似。此外,使分泌型GP(sGP)的表达失活导致一种工程病毒对从BDBV幸存者分离的BDBV52单克隆抗体的敏感性增加,这表明sGP在人类丝状病毒感染情况下逃避抗体中和中发挥作用。
该研究表明,广泛用作丝状病毒中和抗体表征替代靶标的G蛋白被丝状病毒GP取代的嵌合弹状病毒不能准确预测抗体中和正宗丝状病毒的能力,正宗丝状病毒似乎对中和具有抗性。然而,表达荧光蛋白的重组EBOV能够耐受GP与异源丝状病毒对应物的交换,从而允许对B细胞系进行高通量筛选以分离任何丝状病毒特异性的单克隆抗体。从BDBV感染幸存者中分离出的人源单克隆抗体BDBV52能够部分中和携带BDBV GP且sGP表达失活的嵌合EBOV。相比之下,表达sGP的亲本病毒对该单克隆抗体具有抗性。因此,丝状病毒耐受GP交换的能力可用于鉴定任何丝状病毒特异性的中和单克隆抗体以及表征单克隆抗体的特异性和作用机制。