Llewellyn Stacey, Inpankaew Tawin, Nery Susana Vaz, Gray Darren J, Verweij Jaco J, Clements Archie C A, Gomes Santina J, Traub Rebecca, McCarthy James S
Clinical Tropical Medicine Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jan 28;10(1):e0004380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004380. eCollection 2016 Jan.
Accurate quantitative assessment of infection with soil transmitted helminths and protozoa is key to the interpretation of epidemiologic studies of these parasites, as well as for monitoring large scale treatment efficacy and effectiveness studies. As morbidity and transmission of helminth infections are directly related to both the prevalence and intensity of infection, there is particular need for improved techniques for assessment of infection intensity for both purposes. The current study aimed to evaluate two multiplex PCR assays to determine prevalence and intensity of intestinal parasite infections, and compare them to standard microscopy.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Faecal samples were collected from a total of 680 people, originating from rural communities in Timor-Leste (467 samples) and Cambodia (213 samples). DNA was extracted from stool samples and subject to two multiplex real-time PCR reactions the first targeting: Necator americanus, Ancylostoma spp., Ascaris spp., and Trichuris trichiura; and the second Entamoeba histolytica, Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia. duodenalis, and Strongyloides stercoralis. Samples were also subject to sodium nitrate flotation for identification and quantification of STH eggs, and zinc sulphate centrifugal flotation for detection of protozoan parasites. Higher parasite prevalence was detected by multiplex PCR (hookworms 2.9 times higher, Ascaris 1.2, Giardia 1.6, along with superior polyparasitism detection with this effect magnified as the number of parasites present increased (one: 40.2% vs. 38.1%, two: 30.9% vs. 12.9%, three: 7.6% vs. 0.4%, four: 0.4% vs. 0%). Although, all STH positive samples were low intensity infections by microscopy as defined by WHO guidelines the DNA-load detected by multiplex PCR suggested higher intensity infections.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Multiplex PCR, in addition to superior sensitivity, enabled more accurate determination of infection intensity for Ascaris, hookworms and Giardia compared to microscopy, especially in samples exhibiting polyparasitism. The superior performance of multiplex PCR to detect polyparasitism and more accurately determine infection intensity suggests that it is a more appropriate technique for use in epidemiologic studies and for monitoring large-scale intervention trials.
准确量化土壤传播的蠕虫和原生动物感染情况,对于解读这些寄生虫的流行病学研究以及监测大规模治疗效果和有效性研究至关重要。由于蠕虫感染的发病率和传播与感染率及感染强度直接相关,因此特别需要改进技术来评估这两方面的感染强度。本研究旨在评估两种多重聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测方法,以确定肠道寄生虫感染的患病率和感染强度,并将其与标准显微镜检查法进行比较。
方法/主要发现:共收集了680人的粪便样本,这些人来自东帝汶农村社区(467份样本)和柬埔寨(213份样本)。从粪便样本中提取DNA,并进行两次多重实时PCR反应,第一次反应针对:美洲板口线虫、钩虫属、蛔虫属和鞭虫;第二次反应针对:溶组织内阿米巴、隐孢子虫属、十二指肠贾第虫和粪类圆线虫。样本还进行了硝酸钠漂浮法以鉴定和定量土壤传播的蠕虫虫卵,以及硫酸锌离心漂浮法以检测原生动物寄生虫。多重PCR检测到的寄生虫患病率更高(钩虫高出2.9倍,蛔虫高出1.2倍,贾第虫高出1.6倍),并且多重PCR在检测多重寄生虫感染方面表现更优,随着存在的寄生虫数量增加,这种效果更加明显(一种寄生虫:40.2%对38.1%,两种寄生虫:30.9%对12.9%,三种寄生虫:7.6%对0.4%,四种寄生虫:0.4%对0%)。尽管按照世界卫生组织的指南,通过显微镜检查所有土壤传播的蠕虫阳性样本均为低强度感染,但多重PCR检测到的DNA载量表明感染强度更高。
结论/意义:与显微镜检查相比,多重PCR除了具有更高的灵敏度外,还能更准确地确定蛔虫、钩虫和贾第虫的感染强度,尤其是在表现出多重寄生虫感染的样本中。多重PCR在检测多重寄生虫感染和更准确确定感染强度方面的卓越性能表明,它是用于流行病学研究和监测大规模干预试验的更合适技术。