Ang Marcus, Cai Yijun, MacPhee Becky, Sim Dawn A, Keane Pearse A, Sng Chelvin C A, Egan Catherine A, Tufail Adnan, Larkin Daniel F, Wilkins Mark R
Singapore National Eye Center, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Nov;100(11):1557-1563. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307706. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
BACKGROUND/AIM: To describe an optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) system adapted for anterior segment imaging, compared with indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) in eyes with corneal vascularisation.
Retrospective study of subjects with corneal vascularisation secondary to microbial keratitis who had OCTA scans performed using a commercially available split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation algorithm angiography system (AngioVue; Optovue Inc., Fremont, California, USA) and ICGA images (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). The agreement between OCTA and ICGA techniques in terms of area of vascularisation measured, using Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement (LOA).
We compared the area of corneal vascularisation in 64 scan images (eight eyes, four scans for each angiography technique). In our series, the overall mean area of vascularisation from the ICGA scans was 0.49±0.34 mm and OCTA scans was 0.51±0.36 mm. We obtained substantial repeatability in terms of image quality score (κ=0.80) for all OCTA scans. The agreement between OCTA and ICGA scans was good, although ICGA measured a smaller area compared with the OCTA with a mean difference of -0.03 mm (95% CI -0.07 to 0.01). The LOA ranged from a lower limit of -0.27 (95% CI -0.34 to -0.19) to an upper limit of 0.20 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.28, p=0.127).
We found that rapid, non-contact OCTA adapted for the cornea was comparable with ICGA for measurement of the area of corneal vascularisation in this pilot clinical study. Further prospective studies are required to confirm if this relatively new imaging technique may be further developed to replace invasive angiography techniques for the anterior segment.
背景/目的:描述一种适用于眼前段成像的光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)系统,并将其与角膜血管化眼的吲哚菁绿血管造影(ICGA)进行比较。
对继发于微生物性角膜炎的角膜血管化患者进行回顾性研究,这些患者使用市售的分裂谱幅度去相关算法血管造影系统(AngioVue;美国加利福尼亚州弗里蒙特市Optovue公司)进行OCTA扫描,并获取ICGA图像(Spectralis;德国海德堡海德堡工程公司)。使用布兰德-奥特曼95%一致性界限(LOA)比较OCTA和ICGA技术在测量血管化面积方面的一致性。
我们比较了64幅扫描图像(8只眼,每种血管造影技术各4次扫描)中的角膜血管化面积。在我们的研究系列中,ICGA扫描的血管化总面积平均为0.49±0.34 mm,OCTA扫描为0.51±0.36 mm。对于所有OCTA扫描,我们在图像质量评分方面获得了较高的重复性(κ=0.80)。OCTA和ICGA扫描之间的一致性良好,尽管ICGA测量的面积比OCTA小,平均差异为-0.03 mm(95%CI -0.07至0.01)。LOA范围从下限-0.27(95%CI -0.34至-0.19)到上限0.20(95%CI 0.13至0.28,p=0.127)。
在这项初步临床研究中,我们发现适用于角膜的快速、非接触式OCTA在测量角膜血管化面积方面与ICGA相当。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来确认这种相对较新的成像技术是否可以进一步发展以取代眼前段的侵入性血管造影技术。