Olariaga I, Van Vooren N, Carbone M, Hansen K
Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Botany, P.O. Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden;
36 rue de la Garde, F-69005 Lyon, France.
Persoonia. 2015 Dec;35:166-229. doi: 10.3767/003158515X688000. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
The easily recognised genus Otidea is subjected to numerous problems in species identification. A number of old names have undergone various interpretations, materials from different continents have not been compared and misidentifications occur commonly. In this context, Otidea is monographed, based on our multiple gene phylogenies assessing species boundaries and comparative morphological characters (see Hansen & Olariaga 2015). All names combined in or synonymised with Otidea are dealt with. Thirty-three species are treated, with full descriptions and colour illustrations provided for 25 of these. Five new species are described, viz. O. borealis, O. brunneoparva, O. oregonensis, O. pseudoleporina and O. subformicarum. Otidea cantharella var. minor and O. onotica var. brevispora are elevated to species rank. Otideopsis kaushalii is combined in the genus Otidea. A key to the species of Otidea is given. An LSU dataset containing 167 sequences (with 44 newly generated in this study) is analysed to place collections and determine whether the named Otidea sequences in GenBank were identified correctly. Fourty-nine new ITS sequences were generated in this study. The ITS region is too variable to align across Otidea, but had low intraspecific variation and it aided in species identifications. Thirty type collections were studied, and ITS and LSU sequences are provided for 12 of these. A neotype is designated for O. cantharella and epitypes for O. concinna, O. leporina and O. onotica, along with several lectotypifications. The apothecial colour and shape, and spore characters are important for species identification. We conclude that to distinguish closely related or morphologically similar species, a combination of additional features are needed, i.e. the shape of the paraphyses, ectal excipulum structure, types of ectal excipulum resinous exudates and their reactions in Melzer's reagent and KOH, tomentum and basal mycelium colours and exudates. The KOH reaction of excipular resinous exudates and basal mycelium are introduced as novel taxonomic characters.
易于识别的耳盘菌属在物种鉴定方面存在诸多问题。一些旧名称有多种不同的解释,来自不同大陆的材料未作比较,错误鉴定也很常见。在此背景下,基于我们评估物种界限的多基因系统发育和比较形态特征(见Hansen和Olariaga,2015年),对耳盘菌属进行了专著式研究。处理了所有归入耳盘菌属或与其同义的名称。共涉及33个物种,其中25个有完整描述和彩色插图。描述了5个新物种,即北方耳盘菌、微小褐耳盘菌、俄勒冈耳盘菌、假拟小孢耳盘菌和亚蚁耳盘菌。微小鸡油耳盘菌变种和短孢耳盘菌变种被提升为物种等级。考沙利耳盘菌被归入耳盘菌属。给出了耳盘菌属物种检索表。分析了一个包含167个序列(本研究新生成44个)的LSU数据集,以对样本进行定位,并确定GenBank中命名的耳盘菌序列是否鉴定正确。本研究新生成了49个ITS序列。ITS区域在耳盘菌属内过于多变而无法比对,但种内变异较低,有助于物种鉴定。研究了30份模式标本,其中12份提供了ITS和LSU序列。为鸡油耳盘菌指定了新模式,为雅致耳盘菌、小孢耳盘菌和耳状耳盘菌指定了后选模式,同时进行了多项选模式指定。子囊盘的颜色和形状以及孢子特征对物种鉴定很重要。我们得出结论,为区分亲缘关系密切或形态相似的物种,需要结合其他特征,即侧丝的形状、外层菌幕结构、外层菌幕树脂状分泌物的类型及其在Melzer试剂和氢氧化钾中的反应、绒毛和基部菌丝体的颜色及分泌物。将外层菌幕树脂状分泌物和基部菌丝体的氢氧化钾反应作为新的分类特征引入。