Reininghaus Ulrich, Kempton Matthew J, Valmaggia Lucia, Craig Tom K J, Garety Philippa, Onyejiaka Adanna, Gayer-Anderson Charlotte, So Suzanne H, Hubbard Kathryn, Beards Stephanie, Dazzan Paola, Pariante Carmine, Mondelli Valeria, Fisher Helen L, Mills John G, Viechtbauer Wolfgang, McGuire Philip, van Os Jim, Murray Robin M, Wykes Til, Myin-Germeys Inez, Morgan Craig
Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands;
Psychosis Studies Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK;
Schizophr Bull. 2016 May;42(3):712-22. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv190. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
While contemporary models of psychosis have proposed a number of putative psychological mechanisms, how these impact on individuals to increase intensity of psychotic experiences in real life, outside the research laboratory, remains unclear. We aimed to investigate whether elevated stress sensitivity, experiences of aberrant novelty and salience, and enhanced anticipation of threat contribute to the development of psychotic experiences in daily life. We used the experience sampling method (ESM) to assess stress, negative affect, aberrant salience, threat anticipation, and psychotic experiences in 51 individuals with first-episode psychosis (FEP), 46 individuals with an at-risk mental state (ARMS) for psychosis, and 53 controls with no personal or family history of psychosis. Linear mixed models were used to account for the multilevel structure of ESM data. In all 3 groups, elevated stress sensitivity, aberrant salience, and enhanced threat anticipation were associated with an increased intensity of psychotic experiences. However, elevated sensitivity to minor stressful events (χ(2)= 6.3,P= 0.044), activities (χ(2)= 6.7,P= 0.036), and areas (χ(2)= 9.4,P= 0.009) and enhanced threat anticipation (χ(2)= 9.3,P= 0.009) were associated with more intense psychotic experiences in FEP individuals than controls. Sensitivity to outsider status (χ(2)= 5.7,P= 0.058) and aberrantly salient experiences (χ(2)= 12.3,P= 0.002) were more strongly associated with psychotic experiences in ARMS individuals than controls. Our findings suggest that stress sensitivity, aberrant salience, and threat anticipation are important psychological processes in the development of psychotic experiences in daily life in the early stages of the disorder.
虽然当代精神病模型提出了一些假定的心理机制,但在研究实验室之外的现实生活中,这些机制如何影响个体以增加精神病体验的强度仍不清楚。我们旨在调查压力敏感性升高、异常新奇和显著性体验以及对威胁的增强预期是否会导致日常生活中精神病体验的发展。我们使用经验抽样法(ESM)评估了51名首发精神病(FEP)患者、46名有精神病风险精神状态(ARMS)的个体和53名无个人或家族精神病病史的对照者的压力、消极情绪、异常显著性、威胁预期和精神病体验。线性混合模型用于解释ESM数据的多层次结构。在所有三组中,压力敏感性升高、异常显著性和威胁预期增强都与精神病体验强度增加有关。然而,与对照组相比,FEP个体对轻微压力事件(χ(2)= 6.3,P = 0.044)、活动(χ(2)= 6.7,P = 0.03)和区域(χ(2)= 9.4,P = 0.009)的敏感性升高以及威胁预期增强(χ(2)= 9.3,P = 0.009)与更强烈的精神病体验有关。与对照组相比,ARMS个体对外界地位的敏感性(χ(2)= 5.7,P = 0.058)和异常显著体验(χ(2)= 12.3,P = 0.002)与精神病体验的关联更强。我们的研究结果表明,压力敏感性、异常显著性和威胁预期是该疾病早期日常生活中精神病体验发展的重要心理过程。