Lee Jung-Sup, Woo Jong-Yun, Jang Jee-Soo, Jang Il-Tae
Department of Neurosurgery, Suwon Nanoori Hospital, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul Nanoori Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Spine. 2015 Dec;12(4):256-60. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2015.12.4.256. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
Stenosis or herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) occupying lumbar intracanal and foraminal area is an important cause of double radicular symptoms. Using the combined interlaminar and paraisthmic approach, we performed decompression surgery in patients with co-existing intracanal and foraminal lesions. The objective of this study is to describe usefulness and outcome of combined interlaminar and paraisthmic approach surgery and to analysis the cause of poor outcome.
Between Apr 2009 and Apr 2014, 78 patients (42 males and 36 females) with intracanal and foraminal lesions were enrolled in this study. Patients with a vacuum disc, spondylolisthesis, instability or an isthmic defect on the preoperative dynamic view radiograph were excluded from this study. All patients underwent surgery through a combined approach for discectomy and decompression. The outcome of surgery was evaluated and classified into excellent, good, fair and poor.
The results were excellent in 53 patients, good in 9, fair in 6 and poor in 10 during the follow-up. The outcome of the combined approach was excellent to fair in 87% (68 of 78) patients in our study. In the poor outcome group, three patients complained of early-onset relapsed pain (<1 month) and another seven patients complained of delayed-onset pain (>3 months).
Combined approach for both intracanal and foraminal area lesions may be useful if selectively performed on patients whose facet joint is relatively intact, and that it is worthy of consideration as an alternative to fusion surgery; however, further studies are needed.
腰椎管内及椎间孔区狭窄或髓核突出(HNP)是双神经根症状的重要原因。我们采用椎板间和峡部旁联合入路,对合并椎管内和椎间孔病变的患者进行减压手术。本研究的目的是描述椎板间和峡部旁联合入路手术的有效性和结果,并分析预后不良的原因。
2009年4月至2014年4月,本研究纳入78例合并椎管内和椎间孔病变的患者(男42例,女36例)。术前动态X线片显示有真空椎间盘、椎体滑脱、不稳定或峡部缺损的患者被排除在本研究之外。所有患者均通过联合入路进行椎间盘切除术和减压术。对手术结果进行评估,并分为优、良、可、差。
随访期间,53例患者结果为优,9例为良,6例为可,10例为差。在我们的研究中,联合入路的结果在87%(78例中的68例)的患者中为优至可。在预后不良组中,3例患者抱怨早期复发疼痛(<1个月),另外7例患者抱怨延迟性疼痛(>3个月)。
对于小关节相对完整的患者,选择性地采用椎管内和椎间孔区病变的联合入路可能是有效的,并且值得作为融合手术的替代方法加以考虑;然而,还需要进一步的研究。