Dodich Alessandra, Cerami Chiara, Crespi Chiara, Canessa Nicola, Lettieri Giada, Iannaccone Sandro, Marcone Alessandra, Cappa Stefano F, Cacioppo John T
Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;50(4):1011-22. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150605.
Cognitive and affective theory of mind (ToM) can be impaired in the course of neurodegenerative dementias. Experimental tests based on different task conditions and/or complexity may fail to capture disease-specific patterns of impairments. In this study, we assessed with a single task both the affective and the cognitive facets of ToM ability in a sample of 47 patients (i.e., 12 AD, 20 bvFTD, and 15 aMCI fulfilling IWG criteria for AD in predementia phase) and 65 healthy controls. Subjects were administered the Story-based Empathy task (SET), a non-verbal task measuring the ability to infer others' intentions (IA) and emotions (EA) compared to a control condition (causal inferences, CI). Global and single sub-condition scores were evaluated with a vectorial method, analyzing the relationship between social abilities and basic cognitive functioning by means of two indices representing the basic ability to perform the task and the balance between basic functions and ToM skills.Dementia (AD and bvFTD) patients showed impaired performances on all SET sub-conditions, whereas aMCI subjects' performance was not different from healthy controls. Vectorial analysis revealed a specific change in the balance between EA and CI conditions only in the bvFTD group, supporting a disproportionate deficit in mental states attribution based on affective cues. The overall deficit in the task in AD appears to be more general and related to the severity of dementia. This latter finding is further supported by the normal performance of the prodromal AD group.
认知和情感心理理论(ToM)在神经退行性痴呆病程中可能受损。基于不同任务条件和/或复杂性的实验测试可能无法捕捉到疾病特异性的损伤模式。在本研究中,我们使用单一任务评估了47例患者(即12例阿尔茨海默病(AD)、20例行为变异型额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)和15例处于痴呆前期且符合AD国际工作组(IWG)标准的轻度认知障碍(aMCI))以及65名健康对照者的ToM能力的情感和认知方面。受试者接受了基于故事的共情任务(SET),这是一项非语言任务,用于测量与对照条件(因果推理,CI)相比推断他人意图(IA)和情绪(EA)的能力。使用矢量方法评估整体和单个子条件得分,通过代表执行任务的基本能力以及基本功能与ToM技能之间平衡的两个指标分析社交能力与基本认知功能之间的关系。痴呆患者(AD和bvFTD)在SET的所有子条件上表现受损,而aMCI受试者的表现与健康对照者无异。矢量分析显示仅在bvFTD组中EA和CI条件之间的平衡有特定变化,支持基于情感线索的心理状态归因存在不成比例的缺陷。AD患者在该任务中的总体缺陷似乎更普遍且与痴呆严重程度相关。前驱AD组的正常表现进一步支持了后一项发现。