Cary Michael P, Pan Wei, Sloane Richard, Bettger Janet Prvu, Hoenig Helen, Merwin Elizabeth I, Anderson Ruth A
Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC.
Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 May;97(5):760-71. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
To examine contextual (facility and community) and individual factors associated with self-care and mobility outcomes among Medicare hip fracture patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation.
Retrospective cohort study of 3 linked data files: Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility-Patient Assessment Instrument, Provider of Services, and Area Health Resources. Multilevel modeling was used to examine the effects of contextual and individual factors on self-care and mobility outcomes.
Inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs).
Medicare hip fracture patients (N=35,264; mean age, 81y) treated in IRFs (N=1072) in 2012.
Not applicable.
Self-care (eating, grooming, bathing, upper and lower body dressing, toileting) and mobility (walk/wheelchair, stairs) at discharge.
Mean ± SD self-care and mobility scores at admission were 3.17±.87 and 1.24±.51, respectively; mean ± SD self-care and mobility scores at discharge were 5.03±1.09 and 3.31±1.54, respectively. Individual and contextual levels explained 44.4% and 21.6% of the variance in self-care at discharge, respectively, and 19.5% and 1.9% of the variance in mobility at discharge, respectively. At the individual level, age, race/ethnicity, cognitive and motor FIM scores at admission, and tier comorbidities explained variance in self-care and mobility; sex and length of stay explained variance only in self-care. At the contextual level, facilities' case mix (mean patient age, percent non-Hispanic white, mean self-care score at admission) and structural characteristics (rural location, freestanding, for-profit ownership) explained variance only in self-care; facilities' case mix (mean patient age, percent non-Hispanic white, percent living with social support, mean mobility score at admission) explained variance in mobility. Community variables were nonsignificant.
Individual and facility factors were significant predictors of discharge self-care and mobility among Medicare hip fracture patients in IRFs. The findings may improve quality of IRF services to hip fracture patients and inform risk adjustment methods.
探讨在接受住院康复治疗的医疗保险髋部骨折患者中,与自我护理和活动能力结果相关的背景因素(机构和社区)及个体因素。
对3个关联数据文件进行回顾性队列研究:住院康复机构-患者评估工具、服务提供者和地区卫生资源。采用多水平模型来研究背景因素和个体因素对自我护理和活动能力结果的影响。
住院康复机构(IRF)。
2012年在1072家IRF接受治疗的医疗保险髋部骨折患者(N = 35264;平均年龄81岁)。
不适用。
出院时的自我护理(进食、修饰、洗澡、上下身穿衣、如厕)和活动能力(行走/轮椅、上下楼梯)。
入院时自我护理和活动能力的平均±标准差得分分别为3.17±0.87和1.24±0.51;出院时自我护理和活动能力的平均±标准差得分分别为5.(此处原文可能有误,推测应为5.03)03±1.09和3.31±1.54。个体水平和背景水平分别解释了出院时自我护理差异的44.4%和21.6%,以及出院时活动能力差异的19.5%和1.9%。在个体水平上,年龄、种族/民族、入院时的认知和运动FIM评分以及分级共病情况解释了自我护理和活动能力的差异;性别和住院时间仅解释了自我护理的差异。在背景水平上,机构的病例组合(平均患者年龄、非西班牙裔白人百分比、入院时平均自我护理评分)和结构特征(农村地区、独立机构、营利性所有权)仅解释了自我护理的差异;机构的病例组合(平均患者年龄、非西班牙裔白人百分比、有社会支持的生活百分比、入院时平均活动能力评分)解释了活动能力的差异。社区变量无显著意义。
个体和机构因素是IRF中医疗保险髋部骨折患者出院时自我护理和活动能力的重要预测因素。这些发现可能会提高IRF对髋部骨折患者的服务质量,并为风险调整方法提供参考。