Suppr超能文献

传统医疗保险与医疗保险优势计划在家庭保健服务和结果方面的差异。

Differences in Home Health Services and Outcomes Between Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.

BAYADA Home Health Care, Moorestown, New Jersey.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Mar 1;5(3):e235454. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5454.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Private Medicare Advantage (MA) plans recently surpassed traditional Medicare (TM) in enrollment. However, MA plans are facing scrutiny for burdensome prior authorization and potential rationing of care, including home health. MA beneficiaries are less likely to receive home health, but recent evidence on differences in service intensity and outcomes among home health patients is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in home health service intensity and patient outcomes between MA and TM.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2019 to December 2022 in 102 home health locations in 19 states and included 178 195 TM and 107 102 MA patients 65 years or older with 2 or fewer 60-day home health episodes. It included a secondary analysis of standardized assessment and visit data. Inverse probability of treatment weighting regression compared service intensity and patient outcomes between MA and TM episodes, accounting for differences in demographic characteristics, medical complexity, functional and cognitive impairments, social environment, caregiver support, and local community factors. Models included office location, year, and reimbursement policy fixed effects. Data were analyzed between September 2023 and July 2024.

EXPOSURE

TM vs MA plan.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Home health length of stay and number of visits from nursing, physical, occupational, and speech therapy, social work, and home health aides. Patient outcomes included improvement in self-care and mobility function, discharge to the community, and transfer to an inpatient facility during home health.

RESULTS

Of 285 297 total patients, 180 283 (63.2%) were female; 586 (0.2%) were American Indian/Alaska Native, 8957 (3.1%) Asian, 28 694 (10.1%) Black, 7406 (2.6%) Hispanic, 1959 (0.7%) Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, 237 017 (83.1%) non-Hispanic White, and 678 (0.2%) multiracial individuals. MA patients had shorter home health length of stay by 1.62 days (95% CI, -1.82 to 1.42) and received fewer visits from all disciplines except social work. There were no differences in inpatient transfers. MA patients had 3% and 4% lower adjusted odds of improving in mobility and self-care, respectively (mobility odds ratio [OR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99; self-care OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99). MA patients were 5% more likely to discharge to the community compared with TM (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that MA patients receive shorter and less intensive home health care vs TM patients with similar needs. Differences may be due to the administrative burden and cost-limiting incentives of MA plans. MA patients experienced slightly worse functional outcomes but were more likely to discharge to the community, which may have negative implications for MA patients, including reduced functional independence or increased caregiver burden.

摘要

重要性

私人医疗保险优势(MA)计划最近在参保人数上超过了传统医疗保险(TM)。然而,MA 计划因其繁琐的事先授权和潜在的医疗服务配给而受到审查,包括家庭保健。MA 受益人的家庭保健服务接受率较低,但最近关于家庭保健患者服务强度和结果差异的证据不足。

目的

研究 MA 和 TM 之间家庭保健服务强度和患者结果的差异。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项横断面研究,于 2019 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月在 19 个州的 102 个家庭保健地点进行,纳入了 178515 名 65 岁或以上、有 2 次或更少 60 天家庭保健期的 TM 和 107102 名 MA 患者。这包括对标准化评估和就诊数据的二次分析。逆概率治疗加权回归比较了 MA 和 TM 期之间的服务强度和患者结果,考虑了人口统计学特征、医疗复杂性、功能和认知障碍、社会环境、护理人员支持和当地社区因素的差异。模型包括办公室位置、年份和报销政策固定效应。数据在 2023 年 9 月至 2024 年 7 月之间进行分析。

暴露

TM 与 MA 计划。

主要结果和措施

家庭保健的住院时间和护理、物理、职业、言语治疗、社会工作和家庭保健助理的就诊次数。患者结果包括自理和移动功能的改善、社区出院和家庭保健期间转入住院设施。

结果

在 285297 名总患者中,180283 名(63.2%)为女性;586 名(0.2%)为美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民,8957 名(3.1%)为亚洲人,28694 名(10.1%)为黑人,7406 名(2.6%)为西班牙裔,1959 名(0.7%)为夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民,237017 名(83.1%)为非西班牙裔白人,678 名(0.2%)为多种族人士。MA 患者的家庭保健住院时间平均缩短 1.62 天(95%CI,-1.82 至 1.42),除社会工作外,所有学科的就诊次数都减少。住院转院没有差异。MA 患者在移动和自理方面的调整后改善几率分别低 3%和 4%(移动几率比[OR],0.97;95%CI,0.94-0.99;自理 OR,0.96;95%CI,0.92-0.99)。与 TM 相比,MA 患者更有可能社区出院(OR,1.05;95%CI,1.01-1.08)。

结论和相关性

这项横断面研究的结果表明,与具有相似需求的 TM 患者相比,MA 患者接受的家庭保健服务时间更短、服务强度更低。差异可能是由于 MA 计划的行政负担和成本限制激励措施造成的。MA 患者的功能结果略差,但更有可能出院到社区,这可能对 MA 患者产生负面影响,包括降低功能独立性或增加护理人员负担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2f7/10907922/8c6a559d86d6/jamahealthforum-e235454-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验