Pittis Alexandros A, Gabaldón Toni
Bioinformatics and Genomics Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Carrer del Dr Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
Departament of Ciències Experimentals I de La Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
Nature. 2016 Mar 3;531(7592):101-4. doi: 10.1038/nature16941. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
The origin of eukaryotes stands as a major conundrum in biology. Current evidence indicates that the last eukaryotic common ancestor already possessed many eukaryotic hallmarks, including a complex subcellular organization. In addition, the lack of evolutionary intermediates challenges the elucidation of the relative order of emergence of eukaryotic traits. Mitochondria are ubiquitous organelles derived from an alphaproteobacterial endosymbiont. Different hypotheses disagree on whether mitochondria were acquired early or late during eukaryogenesis. Similarly, the nature and complexity of the receiving host are debated, with models ranging from a simple prokaryotic host to an already complex proto-eukaryote. Most competing scenarios can be roughly grouped into either mito-early, which consider the driving force of eukaryogenesis to be mitochondrial endosymbiosis into a simple host, or mito-late, which postulate that a significant complexity predated mitochondrial endosymbiosis. Here we provide evidence for late mitochondrial endosymbiosis. We use phylogenomics to directly test whether proto-mitochondrial proteins were acquired earlier or later than other proteins of the last eukaryotic common ancestor. We find that last eukaryotic common ancestor protein families of alphaproteobacterial ancestry and of mitochondrial localization show the shortest phylogenetic distances to their closest prokaryotic relatives, compared with proteins of different prokaryotic origin or cellular localization. Altogether, our results shed new light on a long-standing question and provide compelling support for the late acquisition of mitochondria into a host that already had a proteome of chimaeric phylogenetic origin. We argue that mitochondrial endosymbiosis was one of the ultimate steps in eukaryogenesis and that it provided the definitive selective advantage to mitochondria-bearing eukaryotes over less complex forms.
真核生物的起源是生物学中的一个重大难题。目前的证据表明,最后的真核生物共同祖先已经具备了许多真核生物的特征,包括复杂的亚细胞组织。此外,缺乏进化中间体对阐明真核生物特征出现的相对顺序构成了挑战。线粒体是源自α-变形菌内共生体的普遍存在的细胞器。不同的假说对于线粒体是在真核生物起源过程的早期还是晚期获得存在分歧。同样,接受宿主的性质和复杂性也存在争议,模型从简单的原核宿主到已经复杂的原始真核生物不等。大多数相互竞争的情景大致可分为“线粒体早期”(认为真核生物起源的驱动力是线粒体向内共生到一个简单宿主中)或“线粒体晚期”(假定在 mitochondrial endosymbiosis 之前已经存在显著的复杂性)。在这里,我们提供了线粒体晚期内共生的证据。我们使用系统发育基因组学直接测试原线粒体蛋白是比最后真核生物共同祖先的其他蛋白更早还是更晚获得的。我们发现,与不同原核起源或细胞定位的蛋白相比,具有α-变形菌祖先和线粒体定位的最后真核生物共同祖先蛋白家族与其最接近的原核亲属的系统发育距离最短。总之,我们的结果为一个长期存在的问题提供了新的线索,并为线粒体在一个已经具有嵌合系统发育起源蛋白质组的宿主中晚期获得提供了有力支持。我们认为线粒体内共生是真核生物起源的最终步骤之一,并且它为携带线粒体的真核生物提供了相对于不太复杂形式的决定性选择优势。